HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 04272010H.R.A. Meeting immediately
following regular meeting
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
April 27, 2010
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Passible Action on All of the foBowingitemst
I. Approval of the April 27, 2010, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested.)
Ii. Proclamations and Recognitions.
III. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Cornamember or cititen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approval of April 13, 2010, Council Meeting Minutes. (pp. 1 — 6)
B. Licenses and Permits. (p. 7)
C. Claims. (pp. 8 -10)
IV. Public Hearing.
A. 2011 Budget Review. Mike Mornson, City Manager and Roger Larson, Finance Director, presenting.
(pp. 11 —15)
V. Reports from Commission and Staff. Don Jensen, Planning Commission Chair, presenting.
A. Resolution 10-029; Approval of the Request for a Variance to Encroach into the Front Yard Setback at 3038
Harding Street NE. (pp. 16 — 26)
VI. General Business of Council.
A. Resolution 10-030; Award A Bid for 2010 Street & Utility Improvements. Pete Willenbring, WSB &
Associates, presenting. (pp. 27 — 30)
B. Resolution 10-031; Approving the Sale of the $1,375,000 GO Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2010A.
Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, presenting. (pp. 31 — 35)
E. Ordinance 10-001; Amending Ordinance 155.23; Signs Requiring No Permit. Mike Mornson, City Manager,
presenting. second readin$) (pp. 36 — 37)
VII. Reports from City Manager and Council members.
VIII. Community Forum.
Individuals mag address the Citg Council abort aty item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to co»re to tine podixvrr, sign their name and address on
the form at the podium, state !heir nate and address far the Clerks record, and Bruit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take of cial action
on items discussed at this time, but mag typieally refer the trnatter to staff for a fndure repot or direct the matter to be scheduled on an rpcoming agenda.
IX. Information and Announcements.
X. Adjournment.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure.
ZACouncil Meetings12010\0427201o'agenda.doc
1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 APRIL 13, 2010
4
5 CALL TO ORDER.
6
7 Mayor Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
8
9 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
10
11 Mayor Faust invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14
15 Present: Mayor Faust; Councilmembers Gray, Jenson, Roth, and Stille.
16 Absent: None.
17 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson.
18
19
20 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
21 ITEMS.
22
23 I. APPROVAL OF APRIL 13, 2010 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
24
25 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve the City
26 Council Meeting Agenda of April 13, 2010.
27
28 Motion carried unanimously.
29
30 11. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
31
32 None.
33
34 III. CONSENT AGENDA.
35
36 A. Consider March 23, 2010 Council meeting minutes•
37 B. Consider licenses and permits; and
38 C. Consider payment of claims.
39
40 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the Consent
41 Agenda items.
42
43 Motion carried unanimously.
44
45 IV. PUBLIC HEARING.
46
47 None.
48
49 V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2010
Page 2
None.
4 VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL.
5
6 A. Update on School Gymnasium Changes. Rod Thompson Troy Urdahl, Wendy Webster,
7 and Summer Minnich, ISD #282 presenting.
9 Mr. Rod Thompson, Superintendent of Independent School District (ISD) #282, stated ISD #282
10 is here this evening to ask for continued partnership to make the school district, city, and
11 community a better place for the communities. A research project was conducted by ISD #282
12 on how to better utilize resources available within the school district and the community. They
13 found that many of the community groups think it would be beneficial to invest in a different
14 lease, or to change language in the lease that would allow them to utilize the gymnasium space in
15 city hall differently, and in doing so they would be able to utilize the school district differently.
16 Mr. Thompson explained that in the past there was limited availability and accessibility within
17 the school district due to security. He stated with upgrades to the facilities and security system
18 there is now the ability to allow community members to use the district differently. He stated the
19 school district is very optimistic that the facilities can be used 24/7. The school is viewed as
20 community based, with the programs available and open to the community.
21
22 Mr. Troy Urdahl, ISD #282 Athletic Director, provided an overview of the school gymnasium
23 changes proposed by ISD #282, including the following information:
24 • Proposal to reconfigure gym space available to the community.
25 • Move current weight room to old cafeteria space.
26 • Move current gymnastic space to community center.
27 • Upper gym becomes a court gym capable of holding two games simultaneously.
28
29 Mr. Urdahl provided an overview of the following reasons for the proposed gymnasium changes:
30 • Meet the needs of the Physical Education Department.
31 • Improve co -curricular scheduling and training.
32 • Improve practice times.
33 • Limit team disruptions.
34 • Increased access for other groups.
35
36 Mr. Urdahl stated the proposed gymnasium changes would dramatically increase gym time and
37 access for the community. He explained with the addition of the school district's new card
38 reader technology and building access, the school will have the ability to provide user groups
39 with cards which allows for building access. This technology, along with the new camera
40 security system, will allow for much greater security. He indicated that it is proposed to open the
41 gym for community use on Saturdays and Sundays.
42
43 Ms. Summer Minnich, ISD #282 Gymnastics Director, provided an overview of the following
44 benefits the proposed gymnasium changes would provide for the gymnastics program:
45 • Allow a dedicated space for the gymnastic program to flourish.
46 6 Allow for an expanded gymnastics program.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2010
Page 3
1 • Increase access to the community.
2 • Improved viewing during gymnastic meets.
3 • Reduce wear and tear on gymnastics equipment.
4 • Eliminate safety and security concerns by having equipment in a more secured area.
6 Ms. Wendy Webster, Director of Community Services, indicated that this gymnasium proposal
7 falls in line with the State's philosophy of opening the schools up to the community. She stated
8 the gymnasium changes will provide Community Services with use of the 1,600 square foot
9 gymnastics floor which will allow them to add climbers and tunnels to the early childhood
10 program. In addition, the gymnastics floor and open space available is fitting for karate, Pilates,
11 yoga, and expanding gymnastics classes.
12
13 Mayor Faust stated his support of the 24/7, community based philosophy.
14
15 Councilmember Stille verified with Ms. Webster that the senior and daycare groups will still be
16 accommodated in the Community Service Program with the proposed changes. He asked
17 whether the concerns that have been raised regarding the need for another gym in the community
18 will be alleviated with the proposed changes. Mr. Urdahl replied that the proposed changes
19 should take care of these concerns.
20
21 Councilmember Gray commented that the proposed gymnasium changes should eliminate or cut
22 down on the need for the basketball program to rent practice space outside of the community,
23 which has been necessary over the last two years.
24
25 Councilmember Roth inquired who would be responsible for moving the floor if there were to be
26 an unforeseen circumstance where the City requires use of the gym. Mr. Urdahl replied it would
27 be the school's responsibility to move the floor.
28
29 Councilmember Stille verified with City Manager Morrison that the gymnasium will be available
30 for city use during elections.
31
32 Councilmember Jenson requested clarification regarding the 2010-2011 Community Services
33 Gym Schedule. Ms. Webster reviewed the proposed 2010 Community Services Gym Schedule.
34
35 Mayor Faust requested information regarding the previous lack of soccer fields in the
36 community. Mr. Urdahl stated the Emerald Park renovations will increase the available soccer
37 fields in the community. There are also renovations happening at the soccer/football field at
38 Denison Field. In addition to the renovations, there will be removable goal posts added;
39 depending on community need, there will be the ability for one, two or three fields. Another
40 thing that recently happened to benefit all activities in Central Park is the lighting of field 3.
41
42 Mayor Faust inquired about plans for a running track at the high school. Mr. Thompson replied
43 that the area is prepared for a 10 -foot wide path which will be asphalt or a cinder type of surface,
44 based on the budget.
45
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2010
Page 4
Mayor Faust verified with Mr. Urdahl that personal hygiene facilities requirements will be met
for the gymnastics program.
Mr. Gary Goldsmith, 2704 32nd Avenue, President of Sports Boosters, addressed the City
Council and stated his appreciation for the renovations at Emerald Park and the access to the
facilities and fields in the community. He requested continued partnership with the school
district. He stated a significant amount of money has been spent for basketball in other
communities due to the lack of space in the community. The proposed gymnasium changes will
make it easier for Sports Boosters to conduct fundraisers with the ability to run tournaments. He
stated Sports Boosters is very supportive of the proposed gymnasium changes.
A resident addressed the City Council and stated fifth graders have been asked to start practice at
9 p.m. and then be at the top of their game academically with a start time of 7:30 a.m. It has
been discouraging for the middle school students when they compete with other communities
that are consistently practicing every day. He stated the proposed changes would be excellent for
St. Anthony students.
Mayor Faust stated ISD #282 will also be attending the May 11, 2010 City Council meeting to
address the proposed gymnasium changes. He applauded the school district for including the
residents in totality in their consideration.
B. Consider Ordinance 10-001: Amending 155.23; Signs Requiring No Permits Mike
Monson, City Manager, presenting (first reading).
City Manager Morrison provided an overview of Ordinance No. 10-001. He explained that the
State Legislature has passed a bill to move the State Primary from the second Tuesday in
September to the second Tuesday in August. Because of this change there are several other
amendments to current election laws. One change that is directly affecting the City's ordinance
is the placement of political signs. The proposed ordinance amends the language as required.
Mayor Faust suggested the ordinance be amended to state that signs may be posted for 28 clays,
rather than including weeks in the verbiage. He suggested holding the first reading tonight,
rather than waiving the first and second reading, due to the proposed amendment.
Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Roth, to approve the first reading
of Ordinance 10-001; Amending 155.23; Signs Requiring No Permit, with the following
amendment: "...may be posted for 4 -weeks 28 days..."
Motion carried unanimously.
C. Quarterly Goals Update. Mike Morrison, City Manager, presenting,
City Manager Morrison presented the Quarterly Goals Update as outlined in the City of St.
Anthony Goals Charting updated 4/13/2010. Strategic Directions include: Environmental
Stewardship; Improve and Maintain Infrastructure; Technology Advances; Maintain and
Improve Housing; Generational Transitions; and Strong, Sound Progressive Community.
51
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2010
Page 5
2 Mayor Faust encouraged residents to review the goals. He pointed out that in regards to
3 Environmental Stewardship, long time St. Anthony resident Mike Shell started Naturally Green.
4 The company is eco -friendly, with products that are natural and safe for kids and pets.
VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
8 City Manager Morrison reported on the pancake breakfast held for the firefighters at Applebee's
9 and on his attendance at the League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Update held in March. He
10 reported on the following items included on upcoming city meeting agendas:
11 • April 27, 2010 City Council: 1) Public hearing on the 2011 Budget; 2) Bid award and
12 bond sale for 2010 Street Project; 3) Amendment to the Chandler Tax Increment
13 Financing District; 4) Second reading of Ordinance 10-001.
14 • April 20, 2010 Planning Commission: 1) Concept review —PUD amendment for signage
15 at Silver Lake Village Center Variance; 2) Concept review — CUP and variance for coffee
16 shop drive through at the former Snyder Drug Store located at 2714 Hwy 88; 3) Public
17 hearing — Variance request for front yard encroachment.
18
19 Mayor Faust stated Applebee's is a business that supports the public employees and firefighters.
20 He encouraged residents to stay in the City when spending their disposable income and to
21 remember the businesses that help pay taxes and go above and beyond as community members.
22
23 Councilmember Jenson reported on his attendance at the League of Minnesota Cities Legislative
24 Update held in March, and a meeting with himself, Mayor Faust, City Manager Morrison, and
25 Secretary of State Ritchie.
26
27 Councilmember Roth reported on his attendance at the April 1, 2010 North Suburban Cable
28 Commission meeting.
29
30 Councilmember Stille: No report.
31
32 Councilmember Gray: No report.
33
34 Mayor Faust reported on his attendance at the April 6, 2010 Middle Mississippi Watershed
35 Management Organization Executive Board Meeting. He reported on his attendance at the
36 League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Update held in March, and a meeting with himself,
37 Councilmember Jenson, City Manager Morrison, and Secretary of State Ritchie. The Secretary
38 of State recognized City Clerk Sueiu for going above and beyond in the recent election recount.
39 Mayor Faust stated he has suggested that Secretary of State Ritchie be invited to speak to the
40 Chamber of Commerce regarding the new businesses that have registered in the State.
41
42 VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM.
43
44 Mayor Faust invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items that
45 are not on the regular agenda.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2010
Page 6
1 Mr. Jerry John, 3456 Silver Lane, resident of Evergreen Townhomes, shared a parody on dealing
2 with financial matters and the city budget. Mr. John stated his concerns regarding the Silver
3 Lake Project budget and stated there are about 200 people affected by the Silver Lake project
4 that do not agree with the project. Mr. John stated his concern regarding the city council.
5
6 Mayor Faust informed Mr. John that respect and civility are required in order to address the city
7 council.
8
9 Mr. John stated his position that there is no logical reason to prevent the City from doing the
10 necessary street improvements as quickly and economically as possible, but that the sidewalk
11 and lighting changes included in the Silver Lake Project are not necessary. He expressed
12 concern with the assessments on the project and stated he is ashamed to be a resident of St.
13 Anthony, and soon to be a somewhat poorer resident of St. Anthony.
14
15 Hearing no other residents wishing to come forward, Mayor Faust moved forward with the
16 agenda.
17
18 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
19
20 None,
21
22 X. ADJOURNMENT.
23
24 Mayor Faust adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m.
25
26
27 Respectfully submitted,
28
29
30 Carol Hamer
31 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
32
33 Mayor
34 ATTEST:
35 City Clerk
36
37
Cl
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: April 27, 2010 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
All Brite Sign, Rogers, MN
Kaufinan Sign, Minneapolis, MN
Timberline Roofing, Minneapolis, MN
Zebro Contracting Services, Ham Lake, MN
Temporary 3.2 Beer Permit:
Applicant: Susan Louiselle
Location: Central Park
Gross Golf Course
2201 St. Anthony Boulevard
US BANK SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE g
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR # PAYEE
CHECK #
DATE
AMOUNT
8964 ACCLAIM BENEFITS
11990
4/28/2010
$120.00
9369 ACTION RADIO & COMMUNICA
11991
4/28/2010
$800.00
9256 ALLIED MEDICAL PRODUCTS
11992
4/28/2010
$48.84
9250 AMERICAN MESSAGING
11993
4/28/2010
$197.40
8794 ARCTIC GLACIER INC.
11994
4/28/2010
$278.30
4687 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC
11995
4/28/2010
$69.25
9424 ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING
11996
4/28/2010
$250.00
9698 ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL
11997
4/28/2010
$38.24
9381 ATLANTIC SIGNAL, LLC
11998
4/28/2010
$55.00
9796 BEARENCE MANAGEMENT GROU
11999
4/28/2010
$2,125.00
320 BEISSWENGER'S
12000
4/28/2010
$174.19
4293 BELLBOY CORP.
12001
4/28/2010
$13,140.02
9778 BERNICK'S
12002
4/28/2010
$862.00
9797 BERTELSON
12003
4/28/2010
$45.91
8555 BIFFS, INC.
12004
4/28/2010
$66.43
7168 BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
12005
4/28/2010
$46.72
9759 C & H SPORT SURFACES, IN
12006
4/28/2010
$1,700.00
4231 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
12007
4/28/2010
$11,444.88
2380 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
12008
4/28/2010
$9,611.43
4080 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTI
12009
4/28/2010
$1,468.55
9056 CITY OF ROSEVILLE
12010
4/28/2010
$5,277.57
8275 CITY OF ST. PAUL
12011
4/28/2010
$3,060.72
8814 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE
12012
4/28/2010
$171.00
4095 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA
12013
4/28/2010
$1,458.39
9524 CREATIVE PRODUCT
12014
4/28/2010
$1,354.28
9726 CRIME STOPPERS OF MINNES
12015
4/28/2010
$150.00
7178 D -ROCK CENTER & SMALL EN
12016
4/28/2010
$115.21
4127 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC
12017
4/28/2010
$1,001.70
9730 DEERY AMERICAN CORPORATI
12018
4/28/2010
$2,115.47
8429 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF
12019
4/28/2010
$510.00
4110 DICKSON ELECTRIC
12020
4/28/2010
$309.00
8634 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICE
12021
4/28/2010
$38.00
5122 DRUSCH/DONALD
12022
4/28/2010
$82.00
8698 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC
12023
4/28/2010
$370.00
8697 EXTREME BEVERAGE
12024
4/28/2010
$78.50
9395 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
12025
4/28/2010
$80.67
9798 FERGUSON WATERWORKS
12026
4/28/2010
$196.19
8153 FILTERFRESH
12027
4/28/2010
$105.75
9667 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO
12028
4/28/2010
$71.98
8647 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
12029
4/28/2010
$3.14
9236 FSH COMMUNICATIONS
12030
4/28/2010
$64.13
1030 G & K SERVICES INC
12031
4/28/2010
$870.99
9695 GALLAGHER BENEFITS SERVI
12032
4/28/2010
$350.00
1110 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
12033
4/28/2010
$56.47
9704 GRAND VIEW LODGE
12034
4/28/2010
$441.40
.0292 GRANDVIEW LODGE
12035
4/28/2010
$441.40
4172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.
12036
4/28/2010
$895.75
9169 HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS
12037
4/28/2010
$19.98
8944 HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT
12038
4/28/2010
$2,488.08
4207 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC
12039
4/28/2010
$3,675.92
US BANK SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE 9
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR# PAYEE
CHECK#
DATE
AMOUNT
8252 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC
12040
4/28/2010
$52.34
9225 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
12041
4/28/2010
$26.96
8658 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, 1
12042
4/28/2010
$85.50
4125 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING
12043
4/28/2010
$61,536.46
4220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
12044
4/28/2010
$23,402.62
9729 LIFT BRIDGE BEER CO.
12045
4/28/2010
$130.00
2040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE
12046
4/28/2010
$527.38
8229 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
12047
4/28/2010
$1,398.83
9114 M. AMUNDSON LLP
12048
4/28/2010
$2,674.62
2125 MALENICK/JOHN
12049
4/28/2010
$70.67
9459 MIDC ENTERPRISES
12050
4/28/2010
$104.32
2374 MINNESOTA UI FUND
12051
4/28/2010
$1,689.90
9195 MISTER CAR WASH
12052
4/28/2010
$176.00
5235 MOTOROLA INC
12053
4/28/2010
$19,899.60
4299 MPLS. OXYGEN CO.
12054
4/28/2010
$10.47
2395 MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC
12055
4/28/2010
$194.51
5232 MURPHY'S SERVICE CENTER
12056
4/28/2010
$15.00
9475 NEOPOST LEASING
12057
4/28/2010
$121.82
8883 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY
12058
4/28/2010
$308.50
9799 NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE
12059
4/28/2010
$87.99
9266 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUP
12060
4/28/2010
$188.90
45 OFFICE DEPOT
12061
4/28/2010
$492.16
9275 PAT KERNS WINE MERCHANTS
12062
4/28/2010
$80.00
9800 PAUL CONWAY SHIELDS
12063
4/28/2010
$129.00
4354 PAUSTIS & SONS
12064
4/28/2010
$1,765.00
4360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
12065
4/28/2010
$2,193.87
4385 QUALITY WINE CO
12066
4/28/2010
$12,942.88
4492 QWEST
12067
4/28/2010
$638.56
9550 RAMSEY COUNTY
12068
4/28/2010
$607.30
9384 RAMY TURF PRODUCTS
12069
4/28/2010
$76.68
9119 RECHECK
12070
4/28/2010
$15.00
9717 ROY C., INC.
12071
4/28/2010
$313.55
9182 SAM'S CLUB
12072
4/28/2010
$105.00
9127 SIMPLEXGRINNELL
12073
4/28/2010
$175.00
8344 SPIESS/JEFF
12074
4/28/2010
$285.00
9784 SPS COMPANIES, INC.
12075
4/28/2010
$476.33
1810 ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE KIWA
12076
4/28/2010
$165.00
8334 ST. PAUL OFFICE EQUIP. R
12077
4/28/2010
$85.00
4780 SURLY BREWING CO
12078
4/28/2010
$3,511.00
3260 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS
12079
4/28/2010
$595.83
9264 TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD.
12080
4/28/2010
$14,760.00
5273 TESSMAN SEED INC.
12081
4/28/2010
$784.65
7337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE
12082
4/28/2010
$252.50
8449 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
12083
4/28/2010
$160.77
9590 U.S. BANK (PURCHASING
12084
4/28/2010
$376.83
.0293 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
12085
4/28/2010
$205.00
9166 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
12086
4/28/2010
$205.00
4490 VAL-PAK OF MINNESOTA
12087
4/28/2010
$740.00
8388 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES
12088
4/28/2010
$664.75
9702 W.D. LARSON COMPANIES LT
12089
4/28/2010
$4.93
9366 WAL-MART BUSINESS CENTER
12090
4/28/2010
$782.50
US BANK SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE 10
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR # PAYEE
4494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN
8316 WINE COMPANY/THE
8310 WINE MERCHANTS INC
4175 WIRTZ BEVERAGE - (GRIGGS
9734 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
4499 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC.
2680 XCEL ENERGY
7325 YOCUM OIL COMPANY, INC.
TOTAL
CHECK#
DATE
AMOUNT
12091
4/28/2010
$591.52
12092
4/28/2010
$320.40
12093
4/28/2010
$1,495.58
12094
4/28/2010
$16,367.30
12095
4/28/2010
$23,965.54
12096
4/28/2010
$223.00
12097
4/28/2010
$18,470.32
12098
4/28/2010
$14,071.71
$300,192.70
11
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 20, 2010
TO: City Council
FROM: Mike Morrison, City Manager
Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING 2011 OPERATING BUDGET
The attached materials are a summary of the 2010 General Operating Budget. Highlights
of the 2010 budget include:
1) General Operating Budget $5,283,400
2) General Fund Levy $2,945,511
a. Same as 2009 Levy — 0% Increase.
b. $37,040 less than maximum Levy Limit set by State
3) Median Valuation in 2010 $ 238,000
a. Down from $253,000 in 2009
4) City Portion of Property Taxes $ 1,234.81
5) Capital Equipment Budget $ 313,200
6) 0% - No Salary increase in 2010
The 2011 budget goals were discussed with the City Council on January 14th and 15th at
our Financial Management and Planning/Goal Setting meetings and at the March I" work
session.
12
04/01/10
IMPORTANT DATES
St. Anthony Budget Schedule for 2011 Budget
January 14 &15, 2010 Goal Setting, Financial Management and Planning.
March 1, 2010 Work Session — Discuss Budget Calendar, 2011 Budgeting Goals,
and review 5 -Year Capital Equipment Plan.
April 27, 2010: Public Hearing/Provide Residents with an Opportunity to have
Input in the budget process.
May 3, 2010: Work Session with Department Heads - Discussion on 2011 Budget
and evaluate 5 -Year Capital Equipment needs.
May - July: City Manager & Staff Meetings to discuss/draft 2011 Budget.
August 2 2010: Work Session with Department Heads — Council & Staff to review
the Proposed 2011 General Operating and Capital Equipment
Budgets.
August 24 2010 Presentation of the Proposed 2011 Operating Budget & Property
Tax Levy to the City Council.
September 14, 2010: Resolution passed:
1) Setting the proposed 2011 Operating Budget and Property
Tax Levy.
2) Announce the date and time at which the final Budget and Tax
Levy will be discussed.
December 14, 2010: Presentation of 2011 Operating Budget and Levy with Public Input.
1) Adoption of the 2011 Operating Budget and Property Tax Levy.
13
GENERALFUND
REVENUES
2009
2010
Levy
BUDGET
BUDGET
General Fund Levy
Property Tax - Levy
$2,945,511
$2,945,511
0.00%
Penalties, Interest, Tax Forfeitures
$3,000
$3,000
0.00%
PERA Levy (Rate Increase)
$7,500
$7,500
0.00%
Licenses
$42,100
$42,500
0.95%
Permits
$190,400
$198,750
4.39%
Dare/School District #282 Levy
$14,500
$14,500
0.00°/
Fire Relief Association - 2% Insurance/Pension
$52,500
$52,500
0.00%
Intergovernmental Revenue
$221,400
$223,200
0.81%
Loss: in Market Value Credit
($135,000)
($135,000)
0.00%
Contract Revenue (Lauderdale/Falcon Heights)
$1,156,500
$1,157,190
0.06%
Charges for Service (Fines)
$107,000
$110,000
2.80%
Miscellaneous Revenues
$155,389
$190,349
22.50%
Transfers & Miscellaneous Revenues
$438,900
$448,400
2.16%
Other Revenue (Grants, Donations & Misc. Services)
$25,000
$25,000
GENERAL FUND TOTAL REVENUES
$5,224,700
$5,283,400
1.12%
EXPENDITURES
2009
2010
BUDGET
BUDGET
Mayor / City Council
$58,800
$56,800
0.00%
Public/Intergovernmental Relations
$26,300
$25,600
-2.66%
Cable Franchise
$28,000
$35,800
27.86%
General Management
$100,000
$109,800
9.80%
Elections
$32,700
$31,200
-4.59/,
Finance, Insurance / Accounting
$280,400
$284,200
1.36%
Finance, Assessing
$49,400
$44,600
-9.72%
Legal
$85,000
$75,000
-11.76%
Engineering, Planning / Zoning
$5,200
$5,200
0.00%
City Building
$181,600
$180,500
-0.61%
Emergency Management
$55,600
$57,300
3.06%
Police Protection
$1,441,800
$1,470,700
2.00%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights Contracts
$994,600
$999,300
0.47%
Maintenance Repair - Vehicles (Police)
$72,600
$81,900
12.81%
DARE
$14,500
$14,500
0.00%
Fire Protection
$742,200
$744,700
0.34%
Maintenance Repair - Vehicles (Fire)
$25,400
$26,300
3.54%
Fire Relief Association - 2% Insurance/Pension
$52,500
$52,500
0.00%
Inspections, Building/Plumbing/Heating/Health
$94,800
$110,200
16.24%
Animal Control
$3,800
$2,800
-26.32%
Public Works
$505,400
$513,300
1.56%
Public Works, Maintenance/Repair Equipment
$69,300
$82,700
19.34%
Tree and Weed Care
$36,600
$35,500
-3.01%
Parks
$186,000
$163,800
-11.94%
Community Services - Grandfather Levy/Ramsey Recycling
$57,200
$52,200
-8.74%
Other Expenditures (Grants, Donations & Misc. - Offset by Revenue
$25,000
$25,000
GENERAL FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$5,224,700
$5,283,400
1.12%
2009
Levy
Increase
$2,945,511
General Fund Levy
$0 0.00%
$1,246,414
Road Levy
$186,818
$403,263
Lease Revenue Bonds
$3,727
$110,500
HRA - Levy
$0
$76,257
Tax Abatement - Parks
($3,037)
$7,500
PERA Rate Increase Levy
$0
$4,789,445
$187,508 4.07%
x 3
(D
CD
0 Q
A
r
w.
--'L :3
r -r
a C)
rh
cn
_
cn
CCn X
�r
t (D
r lC
C"J.
mn
c
z
v
X
m
C
m
z
c
m
14
C0
C)
�.
cn
A,
- I
SS'0
(DD
Kk
E
fV CD
o
0
i�.
G)
a
�71
Cil ch =3�
oC-)
CD
CD 90
m G)
�m
�z
m
v
q r
c -n
;aC
m
Cl) v
15
c
�0,
a) -n
�.
a �
o
®
p
E
fV CD
o
0
i�.
G)
a
�71
Cil ch =3�
oC-)
CD
CD 90
m G)
�m
�z
m
v
q r
c -n
;aC
m
Cl) v
15
STAFF REPORT
To: Mayor & City Council
Mike Morrison, City Manager
From: Kim Moore -Sykes, Assistant City Manager
Date: April 27, 2010
Subject: 3038 Harding Street — Variance to Front Yard Setback
Requested Action: Variance to 152.177 ()) Front Yard Encroachment
Date Application Received: Match 24, 2010
Property Address: 3038 Harding Street
Zoning District: R1
60 -Day Expires: May 24, 2010
Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent: No X
Future Action: Council Consideration, April 27, 2010
Background: Staff received a call from Jeremiah Battles, Acacia Architects, informing staff that Chuck Bower
and Holly Wick Bower, the property owners at 3038 Harding Street, were interested in adding a front porch to
their house as a part of a larger renovation project that they are planning. Mr. Battles asked about the City's
front yard setback regulations and if a front porch was possible. In discussing the proposed front porch, it was
determined that the residential structure's front foundation wall sits on the edge of the front yard setback. The
City Zoning Ordinance allows for a five (5) foot encroachment into the front yard (§ 152.177(D)).
Mr. Battles advised staff that their plans provide for a six (6) foot wide porch. 1Ie reported that typically, a
traditional front porch is six (6) to eight (8) feet wide. He asked about the possibility o£ applying fora variance
to allow for the snore traditional front porch that the), are planning because the property owners are looking for
a front porch that would be more conducive to having an outdoor living space. He and the owners presented
then- proposal for the front porch to the Planting Commission in a concept review at the March 16`x' Planning
Commission meeting. A founal application for a variance was submitted to and accepted by the City.
Application Review
As part of the application process, the applicant is required to provide evidence that discloses facts that a e
unique to the subject property. Section 152.245 of the City Ordinance outlines the requirements that must be
addressed to qualify for a variance and the process by which a variance is granted. Specifically Section 152.245
(C) states that no variance will he granted unless evidence presented supports the following facts and that: strict
enforcement of the City's Ordinance would cause undue hardship because:
1.) The property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance.
2.) The circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the owner.
3.) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential characteristics of the locality.
04202010 Council stf rpt 3038 Harding St FY Encroachment Variance. doc
0
4.) Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship 17
5.) The circumstances causing the hardship are unique to the individual lot.
6.) The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code.
Action: The Planning Commission established the Findings of Facts for this request and unanimously passed a
recommendation for the approval of the one (1) foot variance request to the City's Encroachment Ordinance
based on information and testimony presented by the applicants, the public and staff with Resolution 10-029.
Communications: Staff received two letters in support of the proposed project and feel that the one foot
variance would have little to no impact on the neighborhood. No phone calls or emails were received regarding
this application.
Attachments:
• Site Map
• Photographs of Site
• Architectural Drawings of Front Porch
• City Resolution 10-029
04202010 Council stf rpt 3038 Harding St FY L'neroachment Variance
60' PROPERTY LINE
_
LOW RETAINING WALL ---(APPROXIMATE LOCATION) _ _____
O Q�
I
o I
o
D 25' REAR 5ET13ACK
n---- --- ------------------- -------
-
m hl rn iN
N
a
N
ul n
in
i
O O
rn
7� ' z
rn D rnlul
D
o -60 --0Irn
m�z
O
ajj (s, � I a
�_ rn I77I j i.
0 11
D�i� bio
_ i1 -{
cn
=- U
f
C)
O u1 1 m .�E (.._" 0
t
JO
70
C) 0 C UI ni C
O > Z -1
r. -DC >I (y) C_)
JL) I'il0 ���
_.
U
z sc GO' PROI'ERII I INI-
C)
In '.�.
-u
z
rn
z
G1
S
0
N
0
rn
O
70
C)
91
0
rn
z
C)
rn
-------------- ---
---------------------------
60'PROPERTYLINE --------�
I
I i
I i
I I
I
I
I i
i
I �
, I I
I E I
, 3 I
I I
---- 25' REAR 5ETBACK ��rn
----- ..__ _ _ ____1 ;
rn .0, ; D
;U)
N " Nay
I '
r rn;
70.
z
Irn � r,C
rn
i
' I CJ1
I
D i'rn
i.._--......... D
70 ff ;a
7y I'
rn
rn 4� rn —
a
rq
O O;=
1
33
Ff Ot tHl 11 (a -------- i L
C31 �o+ar wn�r, it
I (�j OC Lk) "
I
A' OZ oP a CD
a rnv��n Ozn tangy ® - p�
z Qaz �Y rn Z '
n NO.CI Y z _ N '
0O0 am zrn 70 On o Ql ;
n I
O
, rn rn
iI
GO' PROPERTY LINE
I '
I 1
� t
, I
I '
HARDING 5TRCf-T NE
o�
-�-�a�
n n n N
000q
rn rn II
-4
rn rn rn 0
rn�110
rn
nrn rrnnOD
W -n O
c��DJJN0x
7uF,)
r�
rn
II Fp
� N
�D
to z
19
20
Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2010
The data contained on tills page is derlved from a compilation of records and maps and may contain dim epancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed
Sand surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and ayes) are approximates and may contain dismrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only.
Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepmsentation of this Information or its derivatives. v
".". �, tf 1,eYyr,1.
LA
rM -mmah
,
r r2 !{i�+� ` : •.11
I t, � It 11* - - . ,
IT
Selected Parcel Data Date Printed: 3/46/205.0 2:03:43 PM
Current Marcel Date: 3/3/205.0
Owner Nate: C E BOWER ES AL TRUSTEES
ParceG kdddress: 303E HARDERG Sr M E r ST. &KNK-ORY RN 55440
P°ivpeA.Ts Type: RESVIEEwir F.AL
Homestead: HOMESTEDRD Sale Date: 06/2000
.area, (sgft): 7224
kreai (acres): 0.47
P -'L-8: T'ORRENS
ARCHITECTS, LLC
Chuck Bower & Holly
Wick Bower Residence
3038 Harding St. NE
Proposed open Front porch
design 3-16-10
21
Front "before" view from Harding Street
Front "after" view with Porch & znd story from Harding Street
1.620 Central Avenue NE Suite #234 Minneapolis, MN 55413 www .acaciaarchitects.com
,�� _ iia.r+,i r'i � �+:i.�..r.i,t,.1 ,rI*� i.�. i.�:�F+ tk� ,.. :s.Zesu'L4�s:,=.!s E i zY �.+��ttir-::.
r
23
24
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 10-029
RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AT 3038 HARDING STREET NE
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was scheduled with the Planning Commission for April
20, 2010 and commenced at 7:05 PM to consider the homeowners' request
for a one (1) foot variance to the front yard encroachment allowance as
permitted by Article XV of the City Code, subd. 152.177(D); and
WHEREAS, the applicants presented their request that they be given a variance so
that they could build a six (6) foot wide front porch; and
WHEREAS, the subd. 152.177 (D) permits up to five (5) feet encroachment into the
front yard and the applicants requested a one (1) foot variance to subd.
152.177(D); and
WHEREAS, the applicants are required to provide evidence that discloses facts that
are unique to the subject property, that strict enforcement would cause
undue hardship; and
WHEREAS, the applicants presented information that the property cannot be put to a
reasonable use without the variance. It is historically a common practice
to construct the principal residential structure at the front yard setback
line so that all the houses are similarly situated on the lot in an orderly
fashion. The City's Zoning Ordinances, allows a five (5) foot
encroachment in the front yard setback to accommodate steps, stoops and
porches for access and egress. The applicants stated that the current
residential front yard setback encroachment of five (5) feet is not wide
enough allow for the enjoyment of a traditional front porch that would
not be as useful for outdoor living space as a more traditional six (6) foot f
front porch; and
WHEREAS, the circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the owners.
The current house was built in 1955 on a lot that for the time was quite
typical. Whether due to the austerity of the times or design trends, front
porches were not generally a consideration in the design and construction
of the houses in St. Anthony at this time so no allowance was given to the
possibility of a porch in the future.; and
WHEREAS, the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential characteristics of the
locality. The owners stated they are committed to renovating this house
to make more room for their growing family and in the process, are also
contributing to an updated look for their neighborhood. Their
25
remodeling efforts are contributing to the community -wide effort to
maintain St. Anthony's housing stock. Additional benefits to the
community by these individual efforts include continuing and
contributing to the sense of community, the quality of life and
encouraging a sense of a village that is welcoming to neighbors. These
are qualities that the City has adopted as a vision for the community; and
WHEREAS, economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship. While
the variance, if approved, would certainly allow the Bowers to update the
look of their home, adding curb appeal and ultimately increasing the
market value of their home, their primary interest as communicated to
staff would be in creating a larger living space for their growing family.
While maintaining the value of this property is important, it is not the
only consideration for the property owners. They have expressed a
desire to live in a community that is committed to fostering and
encouraging positive relationships among neighbors and allows for the
easy enjoyment of their property; and
WHEREAS, the circumstances causing the hardship are unique to the individual lot.
The applicants reported that the lot is a 7,500 SF interior residential lot on
Harding Street with the existing house built in 1955, both of which are
typical for the time. However, by 1976, when the City codified the
Zoning Ordinances, the minimum residential lot size became 9,000SF.
While the situation is not specifically unique to this property as the City
has several residential properties in the area that were platted and built
upon in the 1940s and 1950s and that are non -conforming to those
standards established in 1976, these properties do continue to evolve,
being updated with currently accepted design standards and aesthetics.
In order to maintain the City's housing stock, renovations and design
changes will on occasion require formal and legal action on the part of the
City to support the residents' efforts that create safe, secure and
comfortable places to live; and
WHEREAS, the granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Zoning Code. The Zoning Code was adopted to protect the health, safety
and general welfare of the City and its residents. By granting this
variance, the general welfare of neighborhood is protected by the efforts
of property owners to reinvest in their property thereby continuing to
enhance the value of their home, contributing to the spirit of community
and fostering positive relationships with neighbors, and thus creating a
safer and more secure community; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commissioners unanimously voted to recommend approval
of the proposed one (1) foot variance to the Front Yard Setback
Encroachment for 3038 Harding Street NE.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony does hereby agree
with the Planning Commissions recommendation, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony does
hereby approve the one (1) foot variance to the Front Yard Setback
Encroachment for 3038 Harding Street NE.
Adopted this 2701 day of A nil 2010.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
Mayor
City Manager
26
AL
WSB
c A—Klar,y, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel, 763 541-4600
Fax: 763 541 A 700
April 13, 2010
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
C/o Michael Morrison
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418-1603
Re: 2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project
St. Anthony Village, MN
WSB Project No. 1626-46
Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff:
Attached for your consideration is a resolution awarding the contract for the 2010 street
reconstruction project to the lowest bidder. A tabulation of these bidders, as well as the low
bidder of Nodland Construction Co. Inc. with a bid amount of $1,364,500.97, can be seen in the
Council packet.
If you have any questions, Pete Willenbring will be present at the April 27, 2010 Council
Meeting to discuss those with you or please call me at 763-287-7182,
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Todd E. Hubmer, PE
City Engineer
Enclosures
Minneapolis ❑ St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
27
BID TABULATION SUMMARY
PROJECT:
Silver Lane Street and Utility improvement Project and
Highcrest Road/Old Highway 8 Mill and Overlay Project
S.A.P. 161-107-002, et W.
LOCATION:
City of St. Anthony Village, MN
WSB PROJECT NO.:
1626-46
Bids Opened: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.
Bid Security
Contractor
Grand Total Bid
1
Nodland Construction Co. Inc.
X
$1,364,500.97
2
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
X
$1,461,694.31
3
Northdale Construction Company, Inc.
X
$1,533,420.39
4
Ryan Contracting Co.
X
$1,542,375.72
5
LaTour Construction, Inc.
X
$1,562,038.41
6
S. R. Weidema, Inc.
X
$1,626,102.61
7
Geislinger & Sons, Inc.
X
$1,629,176.30
8
Park Construction Company
X
$1,689,162.29
9
Redstone Construction Company, Inc.
X
$1,736,962.06
10
C. S. McCrossan Construction, Inc.
X
$2,085,176.11
Engineer's Opinion of Cost: $1,895,951.50
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on February 16, 2010.
Denotes corrected figure
Todd E, Hubmer, PE, City Engineer
KM1626-46IAdminlConstruction AdmIM1626.46 Bid Tab Summary
29
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 10-030
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A BID FOR
2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement as shown on the plan for
the above -referenced project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to
law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
WHEREAS, it appears that Nodland Construction Co. Inc. of Alexandria, MN is the lowest
responsible bidder,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, of the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract
with Nodland Construction Co. Inc. in the amount of $1,364,50097 in the name of the City of
St. Anthony, Minnesota for the improvement outlined in the above -referenced project according
to the plans and specifications, therefore, approved by the City Council and on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
2. The Engineer, WSI3 & Associates, Inc., is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to
all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder
and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
zdco10-.U.,' - dxm'Ang Ord for Inipr'mreniens. doe
Contractor
Total Bid
I
Nodland Construction Co. Inc.
$1,364,500.97
2.
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
$1,461,694.31
3.
Northdale Construction Company, Inc.
$1,533,420.39
4.
Ryan Contracting Co.
$1,542,375.72
5.
LaTour Construction, Inc.
$1,562,038.41
6.
S. R. Weidema, Inc.
$1,626,102.61
7.
Geislinger & Sons, Inc.
$1,629,176.30
8.
Park Construction Company
$1,689,162.29
9.
Redstone Construction Company, Inc.
$1,736,962.06
10.
C. S. McCrossan Construction, Inc.
$2,085,176.11
WHEREAS, it appears that Nodland Construction Co. Inc. of Alexandria, MN is the lowest
responsible bidder,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, of the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract
with Nodland Construction Co. Inc. in the amount of $1,364,50097 in the name of the City of
St. Anthony, Minnesota for the improvement outlined in the above -referenced project according
to the plans and specifications, therefore, approved by the City Council and on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
2. The Engineer, WSI3 & Associates, Inc., is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to
all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder
and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
zdco10-.U.,' - dxm'Ang Ord for Inipr'mreniens. doe
Adopted this 27th day of April, 2010.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
u-(. ...... (AfIli 1120100427201OR..1'i 10"',-,n,n„rnF
30
31
Report Date:
Meeting Date:
RF6?—kF,S T -FOR GOLNO(L Gc>I`/S(D� 477ON
April 27, 2010
April 27, 2010
Agenda Section: VI. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Resolution 10-031; Approving the Sale of the $1,375,000 GO
Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2010A
MANAGER'S REVIEW:
Final bid information for the $1,375,000 GO Street
Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2010A will distributed the
evening of the council meeting.
The bid opening as in all bond sales is April 27th, the day of
the Council meeting.
Attached is the credit report from Standards & Poor's
reaffirming our AA credit rating.
k7b
Michael Mor son
City Manager
ZACouncil Meetings12010104272010\staff GO street recon Uonds.doc
Summary:
St. Anthony, Minnesota; General
Obligation
Prime ry Cred it Analyst:
Corey Friedman, Chicago (1) 312-233-7010; coney_lriedmanCOstandardandpoors.com
Secondary Credit Analyst:
Linda Merus, Chicago (1) 312-233-7017; linda_merus@standardandpoors.cam
Table Of Contents
Rationale
Outlook
Related Criteria And Research
www.standardandpoors.coni/ratingsdirect
19 6461300030603
Summary:
St. Anthony, Minnesota; General. Obligation
US$1.375 mil GO street recon bnds ser 201 OA due 02/01/2026
Long Term Rating AA/Stable New
St Anthony GO
Long Term Rating AA/Stable Affirmed
Rationale
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has assigned its 'AA' long-term rating to the city of St. Anthony, Minn.'s series
2010 general obligation (GO) street reconstruction bonds. Standard & Poor's also affirmed its 'AA' rating on the
city's previously issued debt. The 'AA' rating reflects our view of the city's:
Strong income and wealth indicators relative to national levels;
Healthy financial profile, including a very strong general fund balance; and
Good management practices, including extensive planning, which have contributed to the city's strong financial
standing.
In our view, offsetting these factors are the city's high debt burden on a per capita basis and high debt expenditures
as a percentage of total governmental costs.
Officials will use bond proceeds to finance various capital improvements, per St. Anthony's five-year capital
improvement plan. The city's full faith and credit GO pledge secures these obligations.
St. Anthony is a fully built -out first -ring suburb of Minneapolis -St. Paul (Twin Cities). Overlapping both Hennepin
County (AAA/Stable) and Ramsey County (AAA/Stable), the city has easy access to the Twin Cities via Interstate
35W and public transportation. Its residential population of about 8,437 mostly commutes within the metropolitan
area, which provides ample employment opportunities. Residents also have access to public sector and retail jobs
within the city itself. Income levels are good, in our opinion, with the median household and per capita incomes at
100% and 113% of the national levels, respectively.
Taxable market value in the city has risen rapidly in the past five years, averaging an annual growth rate of 12%. A
major redevelopment in the city, Silver Lake Village Redevelopment, contributed to the increase with its addition of
apartments, condominiums, and commercial space to an area that formerly held an enclosed shopping mall. For
2008, St. Anthony's indicated market value was more than $893 million. At $105,912 per capita, this market value
level is a sign of extremely strong wealth in the area, in our opinion.
In our opinion, the city has exhibited very stable financial operations enhanced by a very strong general fund
balance. At fiscal year-end 2008, general fund reserves held $1.44 million, of which $1.39 million was unreserved.
At 28% of expenditures, this unreserved portion is very strong, in our view, but it is slightly below the city council's
policy of maintaining 30%-35% of expenditures in reserves. In fiscal 2008, despite a year-end reduction in market
value homestead credit (MHVC) of $65,000 from the state, St. Anthony generated a slight operating surplus of
Standard & Poor's I RatingsGirect on the Global Credit Portal I April 21, 2010
1920461100030603
33
Summary: St. Anthony, Minnesota; General Obligation
$2,000. The city does not currently receive local government aid or an MHVC. For fiscal 2009, it showed an
unaudited general fund surplus of $85,000. For fiscal 2010, city officials anticipate showing at least a breakeven
result in the general fund. Like many Minnesota municipalities, St. Anthony operates a liquor store, which currently
holds unrestricted net assets of $443,000. Profits from the store are annually transferred into the general fund to
supplement revenue.
St. Anthony's management practices are considered "good" under Standard & Poor's Financial Management
Assessment (FMA). An FMA of good indicates that practices exist in most areas, but not all may be formalized or
regularly monitored by governance officials. The city engages in extensive financial planning, including maintaining
a document that projects the city's capital and operating needs over a 20 -year span. The city council uses this tool,
along with several detailed capital improvement plans that cover equipment needs, building improvements, roads,
and the water/sewer system, to aid the yearly budgeting and goal -setting process.
In our opinion, the city's overall debt burden is high on a per capita basis at $5,729, but only moderate when
considered as a percentage of market value at 5.4%. The carrying charges, or debt expenditures as a fraction of
governmental costs minus capital outlay, are elevated at 28%. Balancing these high annual debt costs is rapid
amortization of the bonds --68% of the city's debt outstanding is due to be retired within 10 years. We understand
that management plans to issue annual road reconstruction bonds of approximately $1.5 million in 2011.
Outlook
The stable outlook reflects our expectation that St. Anthony will continue to engage in financial planning,
particularly as it faces future cuts in state aid, in order to preserve its good reserve levels in line with council policy.
Participation in the deep and diverse Minneapolis -St. Paul economic base further supports the rating.
Related Criteria And Research
USPF Criteria: GO Debt, Oct. 12, 2006
Complete ratings information is available to RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal subscribers at
www.globalcreditportal.com and RatingsDirect subscribers at www.ratingsdirect.com, All ratings affected by this
rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings
search box located in the left column.
wvuuv.sta+rdardandpours.com/ratingsdi rest
70,2045 13001330603
34
Copyright ( c ) 2010 by Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw -Hitt Companies, Inc All rights reserved.
No content (including ratings, credit -related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified,
reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P The Content
shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third -party providers, as well, as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or
omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user The Content is
provided on an'as is' basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING
WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION to no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any
party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without
limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity Costs) in cunnechon with any use of the Content even sf advised of the possibility of such damages
Credit -related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or
recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to snake any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any
form or format, The Content should riot be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisurs and/or
clients when making investment and other business decisions S&P's opinions and analyses do not address tha suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or
an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or
independent venficatson of any information it receives.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities As a result,
certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the
confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit -related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from ob4igws S&P reserves the right
to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpDors.com (free of charge), and
www ratingsduect.com and www.globalereditportal.com {subscription}, and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third -party
redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www standardandpoors.com/usralingsfees.
Standard rbc Poor's I RatingsRirect on the Global Credit Portal I April 21, 2010
73-11046 1300030603
35
- ' 6
STAFF REPORT
To: Michael J. Mormon, City Manager
From: Barb Suciu, City Cleric
Date: April 27, 2010
Subject: Ordinance Amendment — Political Signs (second reading)
Background:
Recently the State Legislature passed a bill to move the State Primary from the second Tuesday in September to
the sccond'l'ucsday in August. Because of this change there are several other amendments to current election
laws. One change that is directly affecting our ordinance is the placement of political signs. Current language in
section 155.23 (F) indicates that signs can be placed from August 1 in the state general election year. This
language needs to be amended to 46 days before the state prima y to correspond with the new date of the primary
election.
The first reading of the ordinance amendment was April 13"i, and the City Council made a couple of minor
adjustments. Before you tonight is the second reading with the minor amendments.
Attachments:
• Ordinance 10-001; Amending Ordinance 155.23; Signs Requiring No Permits.
Staff political signs
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
ORDINANCE 10-001
AMENDING ORDINANCE 155.23; SIGNS REQUIRING NO PERMITS
155.23 SIGNS REQUIRING NO PERMITS.
(F) Non-commercial signs exemption. All non-commercial signs of any size may be
posted in any number from 46 days before the state primary in a state general election
year until 10 days following the state general election. For local elections, which are
usually held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of odd -numbered
years, all noncommercial signs of any size may be posted for 4weeks 28 days prior to a
local election until 5 days following the local election. These exempted non-commercial
signs are not allowed to be placed within 10 feet from the curb and 10 feet from the
property lines. If these signs are placed in violation of these setbacks, they will be
removed by the City Code Inspector.
These ordinance changes shall be in full force and effect upon passage by the City Council and
pablication of the Ordinance or a Summary thereof in the City's official newspaper.
First Reading: April 13, 2010
Second Reading:
Adopted:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
37
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
4/27/2010
Meeting
Date
Meeting
Type
Staff
Items/Issues
Mays
Worksession
r
�.00 p.m.
All Department (leads
Capital Improvement Plan
2011 Budget
May 1l
Regular
imchamaion & Recogo3400
Proclamation for Berger Transfer
Proclamation & Recognition
Citizen's Academy Graduation
City Engineer
City Engineer Update
("Iforniational only)
City Manager
Approval of the Changes to the lease agreement for the
Cornmunity Service Gymnasiutn
May 25
Regular
Planning Commission items from May 18
June 8
Regular
City Engineer
Resolution on 2011 Street Improvement Project
June 22
Regular
Planning Commission items from June 15
Consent Agenda
Annual Insurance Renewal
Tautges Redpath
Zoog Auditor's Report
Consent Agenda
Appointment of Election Judges for August State Primacy Election
July 13
Regular
July 27
Regular
Proclamation
MN Night to Unite
City Manager
2nd Quarter Goals Update
August 2
Worksession
6:30 p.m.
August 10
Regular
8:00 p.m.
August 24
Regular
September 14
Regular
City Manager
Finance Director
Setting the 201 1 Levy
September 28
Regular
Planning Cornmission items from September 21
Consent Agenda
Appointment of Election Judges for the November State General Election
** WORKSESSIONS - 1ST MONDAY OF THE MONTH AS NEEDED
April 2010
Monthly Planner
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
1
3
Mar 2010
May 2010
S M T W T F S
S M T W T F S
HOLIDAY —
GOOD FRIDAY
1 2 3 4 5 6
1
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
28 29 30 31
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
City Council
Meeting 7pm
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Planning
Commission
Meeting 7 pm
25
26
27
28
29
30
Hennepin
City Council
County Open
Meeting 7 pm
Book Meeting 5
6:30 pm
Printed 6y Calendar Creator for Windows on 313/2010
May 2010
Monthly Planner
Apr 2010
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
Jun 2010
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
1
Clean Up Day 9
am to Noon
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Worksession
5:00 pm
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Batlfield
Lighting
Ceremony 6 pm
City Council
Meeting 7 pm
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Planning
Commission
Meeting 7 pm
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
City Council
Meeting 7 pm
30
31
Memorial Day
Holiday
Printed by Calendar Creator for Windows on 412212010
S
.111112010
M T W '1'
F S
S
M
1 2
3
4 5 6
7
8 9
10
11 13
14
15 16
17
18 O§p 20
21
22 23
24
25 4F 27
28
29 30
31
28
29
30 31
2010 City Meetings Calendar
"All dates and times of meeting are subject to change"
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
8 - Joint Meeting with Parks
Commission
- Parks Commission Mtg.
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
't - Worksession
9 - City Council Meeting
f6
-joint Meeting with
Planning Commission
- Planning Commission Meeting
- Joint Meeting with 15D #282
-7pin
23 - City Council Meeting
5 - Work session (tenative)
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
3 - Work session (tenative)
11- City Council Meeting
18 - Planning Commission
25 - City Council Meeting
Apr 201 U
Feb 2010
S
M
T W `I' I<
S
S
1
2 3 4 5
6
7
810
It 12
13
14
15
17 18 19
20
21
22
24 25 26
27
28
29
30 31
2.3
2010 City Meetings Calendar
"All dates and times of meeting are subject to change"
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
8 - Joint Meeting with Parks
Commission
- Parks Commission Mtg.
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
't - Worksession
9 - City Council Meeting
f6
-joint Meeting with
Planning Commission
- Planning Commission Meeting
- Joint Meeting with 15D #282
-7pin
23 - City Council Meeting
5 - Work session (tenative)
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
3 - Work session (tenative)
11- City Council Meeting
18 - Planning Commission
25 - City Council Meeting
Apr 201 U
Mar 2010
S
M
T W T
F S
S
�!
2 3 4
5 6
7
81
11 I I
12 13
14
15
17 18
19 20
21
22
2.1 25
2.6 27
28
29
30 31
2.3
2010 City Meetings Calendar
"All dates and times of meeting are subject to change"
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
8 - Joint Meeting with Parks
Commission
- Parks Commission Mtg.
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
't - Worksession
9 - City Council Meeting
f6
-joint Meeting with
Planning Commission
- Planning Commission Meeting
- Joint Meeting with 15D #282
-7pin
23 - City Council Meeting
5 - Work session (tenative)
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
3 - Work session (tenative)
11- City Council Meeting
18 - Planning Commission
25 - City Council Meeting
Apr 201 U
May 2010
S
M 11' W
'I'
F
S
M
4 5 6 7
1
2
3
4
fq 6 7
8
9
10
1115
1 �4
15
16
17
18
19 21
22
2.3
24
25
26 28
29
30
23
2010 City Meetings Calendar
"All dates and times of meeting are subject to change"
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
8 - Joint Meeting with Parks
Commission
- Parks Commission Mtg.
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
't - Worksession
9 - City Council Meeting
f6
-joint Meeting with
Planning Commission
- Planning Commission Meeting
- Joint Meeting with 15D #282
-7pin
23 - City Council Meeting
5 - Work session (tenative)
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
3 - Work session (tenative)
11- City Council Meeting
18 - Planning Commission
25 - City Council Meeting
Nov 2010
May 2010
S
M
T W T F
S
1
2
M
4 5 6 7
8
9
'' 1 . 13 14
15
16
17
19 20 21
22
23
24
26 27 28
29
30
31
15
IS
2010 City Meetings Calendar
"All dates and times of meeting are subject to change"
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
8 - Joint Meeting with Parks
Commission
- Parks Commission Mtg.
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
't - Worksession
9 - City Council Meeting
f6
-joint Meeting with
Planning Commission
- Planning Commission Meeting
- Joint Meeting with 15D #282
-7pin
23 - City Council Meeting
5 - Work session (tenative)
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
3 - Work session (tenative)
11- City Council Meeting
18 - Planning Commission
25 - City Council Meeting
Aug 2010
S -M ' i' W' I' F S
! q 3 4 5 0 7
8 11 12 13 14
IS 1618 19 20 21
22 23 25 26 27 28
29 30 J0
Nov 2010
Jul 2010
S
S
M
T W
T
F
S
4
5
1
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
1112
1340
15
IS
16
17
18
19.
21
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
Aug 2010
S -M ' i' W' I' F S
! q 3 4 5 0 7
8 11 12 13 14
IS 1618 19 20 21
22 23 25 26 27 28
29 30 J0
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
2 - Work session (tenative)
10 - City Council Meeting
17 - Planning Commission
24 - City Council Meeting
31- Joint Meeting ISD#282
6 - Work session (tenative)
13 - Parks Commission
14 - City Council Meeting
21 - Planning Commission
28 - City Council Meeting
4 - Work session (tenative)
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
1- Work session (tenative)
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
30 - Joint Meeting ISD#282
.tun 2010Dee 2010
7 -Work session (tenative)
S M 'I' W T 1; S S M T W T F S 6- Work session (tenative)
1 2 3 11 5 8- City Council Meeting 1 2 3 4
6 9 10 11 12 14 - Parks Commission 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 t 13 -Parks Commission
13 16 17 18 19 115 - Planning Commission 12 13 15 16 17 18 14 - City Council Meeting
20 21 23 24 25 26 19 20 22 23 24 25 21 - Planning Commission
27 28 30 22 - City Council Meeting 26 27 29 30 31
29 - Joint Meeting ISD#282 28 -City Council Meeting
Nov 2010
Sep 2010
S
S
M
T W
T
F
S
4
5
1
2
3
4
S
EJ
7 8
1)
10
II
12
1340
15
IG
17
IR
I9
20
22
23
2.1
25
26
27
4W 2.9
30
29
30
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
2 - Work session (tenative)
10 - City Council Meeting
17 - Planning Commission
24 - City Council Meeting
31- Joint Meeting ISD#282
6 - Work session (tenative)
13 - Parks Commission
14 - City Council Meeting
21 - Planning Commission
28 - City Council Meeting
4 - Work session (tenative)
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
1- Work session (tenative)
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
30 - Joint Meeting ISD#282
.tun 2010Dee 2010
7 -Work session (tenative)
S M 'I' W T 1; S S M T W T F S 6- Work session (tenative)
1 2 3 11 5 8- City Council Meeting 1 2 3 4
6 9 10 11 12 14 - Parks Commission 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 t 13 -Parks Commission
13 16 17 18 19 115 - Planning Commission 12 13 15 16 17 18 14 - City Council Meeting
20 21 23 24 25 26 19 20 22 23 24 25 21 - Planning Commission
27 28 30 22 - City Council Meeting 26 27 29 30 31
29 - Joint Meeting ISD#282 28 -City Council Meeting
Nov 2010
Oct 201U
S
S
M
T W
't'
F
S
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
F±]5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
10
17
I8
_ 20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
31
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
2 - Work session (tenative)
10 - City Council Meeting
17 - Planning Commission
24 - City Council Meeting
31- Joint Meeting ISD#282
6 - Work session (tenative)
13 - Parks Commission
14 - City Council Meeting
21 - Planning Commission
28 - City Council Meeting
4 - Work session (tenative)
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
1- Work session (tenative)
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
30 - Joint Meeting ISD#282
.tun 2010Dee 2010
7 -Work session (tenative)
S M 'I' W T 1; S S M T W T F S 6- Work session (tenative)
1 2 3 11 5 8- City Council Meeting 1 2 3 4
6 9 10 11 12 14 - Parks Commission 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 t 13 -Parks Commission
13 16 17 18 19 115 - Planning Commission 12 13 15 16 17 18 14 - City Council Meeting
20 21 23 24 25 26 19 20 22 23 24 25 21 - Planning Commission
27 28 30 22 - City Council Meeting 26 27 29 30 31
29 - Joint Meeting ISD#282 28 -City Council Meeting
Nov 2010
S
M T W
T
F
S
1 2 3
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15 17
18
19
20
21
z2 24
25
26
27
28
29.+1
13 - City Council Meeting
20 - Planning Commission
27 - City Council Meeting
2 - Work session (tenative)
10 - City Council Meeting
17 - Planning Commission
24 - City Council Meeting
31- Joint Meeting ISD#282
6 - Work session (tenative)
13 - Parks Commission
14 - City Council Meeting
21 - Planning Commission
28 - City Council Meeting
4 - Work session (tenative)
12 - City Council Meeting
19 - Planning Commission
26 - City Council Meeting
1- Work session (tenative)
9 - City Council Meeting
16 - Planning Commission
23 - City Council Meeting
30 - Joint Meeting ISD#282
.tun 2010Dee 2010
7 -Work session (tenative)
S M 'I' W T 1; S S M T W T F S 6- Work session (tenative)
1 2 3 11 5 8- City Council Meeting 1 2 3 4
6 9 10 11 12 14 - Parks Commission 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 t 13 -Parks Commission
13 16 17 18 19 115 - Planning Commission 12 13 15 16 17 18 14 - City Council Meeting
20 21 23 24 25 26 19 20 22 23 24 25 21 - Planning Commission
27 28 30 22 - City Council Meeting 26 27 29 30 31
29 - Joint Meeting ISD#282 28 -City Council Meeting
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
April 27, 2010
Call to Order.
Roll Call.
I. Approval of April 27, 2010, H.R.A. Agenda.
II. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve April 13, 2010, H.R.A. Minutes. (pp. 1 -- 2)
B. Claims. (p. 3)
III. Public Hearings.
IV. General Policy of Business of the H.R.A.
V. Staff Reports.
VI. H.R.A. Commissioner Comments..
VII. Information and Announcements.
VIII. Adjournment.
ZACouncil Meetings12010104272010\14RA agezxla.doc
1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 HRA REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 APRIL 13, 2010
4
5 CALL TO ORDER.
6 Chair Faust called the meeting to order at 8:05 p.m.
7
8 ROLL CALL.
9 Commissioners present: Chair Faust; Commissioners Gray, Jenson, Roth, and Stille.
10 Commissioners absent: None.
11 Also Present: Executive Director Michael Mornson
12
13 I. APPROVAL. OF APRIL 13, 2010 HRA MEETING AGENDA.
14
15 Motion by Commissioner Stille, seconded by Commissioner Gray, to approve the April 13, 2010
16 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented.
17
18 Motion carried unanimously.
19
20 II. CONSENT AGENDA.
21
22 Motion by Commissioner Gray, seconded by Commissioner Jenson, to approve the Consent
23 Agenda, which consisted of:
24
25 A. H.R.A. Meeting Minutes of March 23, 2010;
26 B. Licenses and Permits; and
27 C. Claims.
28
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30
31 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
32
33 None.
34
35 IV. GENERAI, POLICY OF BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
36
37 None.
38
39 V. STAFF REPORTS
40
41 None.
42
43 VI. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
44
45 None.
46
47 VII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
48
49 None.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2010
Page 2
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Faust adjourned the meeting at 8:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carol Hamer
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Chair
2
3
's1
w
0 �v
H
Pn
7
\N
coo
U
y
N
o O o
o
Ci
WO
Ci
\H
U�
mmm
I�
Nz
w
O
M
o
WiP
W
N
OH
Y
po In
In
H
H
0
1-3
U] k
x1
Lsi
y£C
mxw
wHG)
OH?0
nzr
H �n
�kro
H C
R1 trJ
to r
n
H
p'
m
m
H x
n
z H
x
n z
a�
m
w
N
rt
m
(�
H
N N N
I�1
n
PO
cow
POW 1p
u ik
000
N N N
O O O
H
Gi
000
000
[,
0P
O tf]
NH
i
H
n�
0
�P
NO
J
y
O
owl
Ox
m
ow,P
o0
l0
J J iP
o
z
O
Ut Ut O
�<
O
000
H
H
t�1 H
t^
Gi
N
G)
3