HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 07242012H.R.A. Meeting immediately
following City Council meeting
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
July 24, 2012
7.00 p.m.
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration Discussion and Possible Action on All of the foRoE ingiterns:
Approval of the July 24, 2012, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested)
if. Proclamations and Recognitions. (no action required.)
A. Minnesota Night to Unite Proclamation. (pp. 1-2)
III. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Coundimember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed front the Consent Agenda andplaced elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approval of June 26, 2012, Council Meeting Minutes. (pp. 3-10)
B. Licenses and Permits. (pp. 11-12)
C. Claims. (pp. 13-18)
D. Resolution 12-069; Awarding a Bid for the 2012 Storm Water Improvement Project. (pp. 19-22)
E. Resolution 12-070; Awarding a Bid for the LED Safety Improvements at 341h Avenue and Silver Lake Road.
(pp. 23-28)
IV. Public Hearing. (None.)
V. Reports from Commission and Staff. (Brian Heinir, Planning Gortsmisrianerispresenting)
A. Resolution 12-071; Approving a Variance to the Rear Yard Setback for the Property located at 3207 Silver Lake
Road. (pp. 29-56)
B. Resolution 12-072; Approving A Three -Foot Variance to the Required 30 -Foot Setback from 371h Avenue South
for the Property at the corner of Foss Road and 37th Avenue NE. (pp. 57- 86)
VI. General Business of Council.
A. Autumn Woods IL Justin Messner, WSB & Associates is presenting.
1. Update. (pp. 87-88)
2. Resolution 12-073; Approving the Vacation of the Sanitary Sewer Easement. (pp. 89-94)
B. Quarterly Goals Update. Mark Casey, City Manager is presenting. (pp. 95-102)
VII. Reports from City Manager and Council members.
VIII. Community Forum.
Indirndualc may address the City Council about any item not included on fig regular agenda. Speakers ars requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the
podium, state their name and address far the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to fire minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but
may typically refer the mailer to stafffora future report or diet the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IX. Information and Announcements.
X. Adjournment.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is sustainable, safe and secure.
R\Council Meetings120121072420121ageudalrg#.docx
PRO CL AMA TION
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Crime Prevention Association, AAA of Minnesota and the St.
Anthony Police Department are sponsoring a statewide crime and drug
prevention program on August 7, 2012, called "Night to Unite and
WHEREAS, this is the "4h " Annual Night to Unite" in Minnesota and it provides a unique
opportunity for St. Anthony to join forces with hundreds of other communities
across Minnesota in promoting cooperative, police -community crime and drug
prevention efforts; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony plays a vital role in assisting the St. Anthony Police
Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts in St. Anthony
and is supporting "Night to Unite 2012" locally; and
WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of the City of St Anthony be aware of the
importance of crime prevention programs and impact that their participation
can have on reducing crime and drug abuse in the City of St. Anthony; and
WHEREAS, police and community together promote neighborhood safety, awareness and
cooperation are important themes of the "Night to Unite" program.
NOW, THEREFORE, the St. Anthony City Council, do hereby call upon all citizens of the
City of St. Anthony to join us in supporting the 4`h Annual "Night to Unite" on August 7, 2012.
FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED, THAT THE ST. ANTHONY CITY COUNCIL,
hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 7, 2012, as "NIGHT TO UNITE" in the City of St. Anthony.
Mayor
July 24, 2012
Date
2
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2012
CALL TO ORDER.
Mayor Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
Mayor Faust invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL.
Present: Mayor Faust; Councilmembers Gray, Jenson, Roth, and Stille.
Absent: None.
Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey, City Engineer Todd Hubmer, Finance Director Shelly
Rueckert.
Guests: John Bilotta (University of Minnesota), Peggy Moeller (HLB Tautges Redpath, Ltd.),
Stacie Kvilvang (Ehlers & Associates), and Don Jensen (Planning Commissioner).
CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
ITEMS.
APPROVAL OF JUNE 26, 2012, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City
Council Meeting Agenda of June 26, 2012.
Motion carried unanimously.
I. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
A. A View from the Big River.
Mayor Faust introduced John Bilotta from the University of Minnesota.
Mr. Bilotta stated he is working on a project called NEMO (Nonpoint Education for Municipal
Officials) that provides communities with knowledge and research and invited the City Council
to attend "A View from the Big River" on July 31"from 4:30 to 8:30 p.m. aboard the
Minneapolis Queen paddleboat. He explained the program provides an opportunity to look at
water and land use from a different perspective and the program is intended to provide local
leaders with more knowledge, skills, and resources to make informed decisions on land use and
its impact on water resources. Ile stated the program goals include maintaining clean water,
improving water resources, and minimizing impact on water resources. He encouraged the City
Council to invite a Planning Commission member, City staff member, or other civic leader that
would benefit from the program.
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
4
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2012
Page 2
Il. CONSENT AGENDA.
A. Consider June 12, 2012, Council meeting minutes;
B. Consider licenses and permits;
C. Consider payment of claims;
D. Consider Resolution 12-056; Approval of Election Judges for the Primary Elections on
August 14, 2012;
E. Consider Resolution 12-057, Confirming the Extension of Limited Clean Up and
Property Damage Protection for Sewer Back -Ups and Water Main Breaks for Water and
Sewer Customers;
F. Consider Resolution 12-058; Regarding Renewal of Municipal Insurance Coverage and
the Waiver of Tort Liability for the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Pro rg am;
G. Consider Resolution 12-059; Approving the 2012-2015 Hennepin County Residential
Recycling SCORE Grant Agreement;
II. Consider Resolution 12-060; Approving the Deferral of the Special Assessments for the
2012 Street Improvement Proiect;
L Consider Resolution 12-061; Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding between the
City of St. Anthony and the City of Birchwood for the Processing of Utility Billing;
J. Consider Resolution 12-062; Approving a $5,000 Increase for Mark Casey
Manager, for Successfully Completing the Six -Month Evaluation Period;
K. Consider Resolution 12-063; Accepting and Approving the Grant Agreement Between
the City of St. Anthony Village and the Minnesota Department of Health for
Implementation of the Source Water Protection Plan•
L. Consider Resolution 12-064; Approving a Stewardship Fund Agreement with the
Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) in the amount of $2,000 for
a Pilot Study of Retention Rates of Grassy Areas for the St. Anthony Public Works
Department,
M. Consider Resolution 12-065; Accepting a Donation from Kiwanis Club of St. Anthony to
the St. Anthony Police Department to Offset Community Service Costs; and
N. Consider Resolution 12-066; Authorizing the City of St. Anthony Village to Submit a
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Grant Application to the Minnesota Public
Facilities Authorities (PFA) and to Authorize City Officials to Execute Grant Agreement
on Behalf of the City of St. Anthony Village for the Silver Lake Village Phosphorus
Removal Treatment System.
Mayor Faust noted that the second WHEREAS clause in Consent Agenda item F contains a
typographical error and the correct amount of liability coverage should state $2.5 million per
occurrence.
Mayor Faust requested that City Engineer Hubmer provide a brief explanation regarding Consent
Agenda item N and requested that this item be removed from the Consent Agenda.
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the Consent
Agenda as amended to move Consent Agenda item N to the regular agenda.
Motion carried unanimously.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2012
Page 3
N. Consider Resolution 12-066; Authorizing the City of St. Anthony Village to Submit a
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Grant Application to the Minnesota Public Facilities
Authorities (PFA) and to Authorize City Officials to Execute Grant Agreement on Behalf
of the City of St. Anthony Village for the Silver Lake Village Phosphorus Removal
Treatment System.
City Engineer Hubmer explained that as part of program for cleaning up Silver Lake and
bringing it into compliance with State regulations, the City has applied for a grant for completion
of the chemical treatment system at Salo Park. He stated the City will treat the area with alum
and will help the City achieve 76% of the required phosphorous reduction on TMDL for Silver
Lake. He noted this program has been in process for over two years and the City has received
money for the project from Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated this project will provide
the City with credits, which can be applied to the street reconstruction projects within the Rice
Creek Watershed District.
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to approve Resolution 12-
066; Authorizing the City of St. Anthony Village to Submit a Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) Grant Application to the Minnesota Public Facilities Authorities (PFA) and to
Authorize City Officials to Execute Grant Agreement on Behalf of the City of St. Anthony
Village for the Silver Lake Village Phosphorus Removal Treatment System.
Motion carried unanimously.
III. PUBLIC HEARING.
None.
IV. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF.
A. Resolution 12-067; Approving a Variance to Exceed the Maximum Allowable Amount of
Impervious Surface for the Property Located at 33013 1" Avenue NE. Don Jensen
Planning Commissioner, presenting_
Planning Commissioner Jensen stated the applicants were in attendance at the June 19°i Planning
Commission meeting but were unable to attend tonight's City Council meeting. He explained
the applicants added a front door as part of a recent remodeling project and are planning to add
front steps to the house. He stated total impervious surface is approximately 55% and the
proposed improvement will add 180 square feet of impervious surface, bringing the total
impervious surface to 5,191 square feet or 56.9%. He indicated the applicants revised their plan
after the Planning Commission requested that the applicant consider diminishing the total
impervious surface to the least amount feasible. He reviewed the criteria for the variance, stating
that the absence of front steps creates unsafe conditions, the applicant proposes to continue to use
the property in a manner consistent with City Code, the plight of the property owner is due to
circumstances unique to the property, the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential
character of the neighborhood, economic conditions are not the sole basis of the practical
5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
6
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2012
Page 4
difficulties, the variance, if granted, will provide safer access and enhance the appearance of the
property, the variance will not prevent future orderly development of the property, and the
improvements will not reduce light, air, or access to the property. Iie noted the City Engineer
does not believe the variance will impact overall runoff in the area.
Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Resolution
12-067; Approving a Variance to Exceed the Maximum Allowable Amount of Impervious
Surface for the Property Located at 33013 1" Avenue.
Councilmember Stille stated it appears the applicants did what they could to decrease the total
amount of impervious surface. He requested that the property owner consider moving the garage
forward if the garage needs to be replaced in the future in order to get closer into compliance
with the City's lot coverage requirements.
Mayor Faust noted that the property owner's original concept added 349 square feet of
impervious surface and based on the Planning Commission's concerns they were able to reduce
that amount to 180 square feet.
Motion carried unanimously.
V. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL.
A. 2011 Audit Presentation. Peggy Moeller, Taut es Reath, presenting.
Ms. Moeller presented the 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAER) and
accompanying reports issued at the conclusion of the audit, including a report on compliance
with Minnesota Statutes Section 6.65, a report on internal controls, the audit management report,
and report on communication with those charged with governance. She stated it was important
to remember the financial statements are the responsibility of management, the role of the
auditor is to report on the fair presentation of thefinancial statements, and a clean opinion was
issued. She explained the State legal compliance report requires seven categories of testing
based on a checklist provided by the State Auditor and no findings of non-compliance were
issued. She stated the auditors do not audit the City's internal controls and internal controls are
considered as part of designing the audit. She advised that two deficiencies were reported and
are listed in the internal control report along with management's response. She provided
historical data on the City's audit findings and stated the repeat finding for 2011 regarding lack
of segregation of duties will not be resolved because the City does not have enough staff to
segregate those duties. She indicated the City's General Fund balance increased $78,137 during
2011 and the General Fund balance of $1,702,837 includes $1,647,566 in unassigned funds and
$55,271 in non-spendable/prepaid items. She stated the City adopted a fund balance policy in
2011 requiring a minimum fund balance of 30% and the actual percent of budget at 12/31/11 was
36.88%. She reviewed the Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds noting for the last two years, the
City experienced a slight operating loss in its water operations; however, the City increased its
water rates for 2012. She indicated for the last four years, the City has had operating losses in its
sewer operations but the City increased its sewer rates in 2012. She advised the City's 2011 net
income from liquor operations was $462,313 and stated the City's expenses for its liquor
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2012
Page 5
operations have historically been lower than the State average. She indicated the HRA Fund
balance is $1,132,690 and the City's HRA projects are identified in the CAFR. She advised the
report on communication with those charged with governance contains all required
communications and noted there were no difficulties encountered in performing the audit and
there were no disagreements with management. She stated the City implemented GASB No. 54
during 2011 and the primary difference relates to how the City reports fund balances in
governmental funds, i.e., non -spendable, restricted, assigned, unassigned, and committed. She
thanked the Finance Department and City staff for their assistance during the audit.
Councilmember Stille requested further information regarding the two findings issued by the
auditors.
Ms. Moeller explained that two findings were repeated and the City has a new finding related to
financial statement misstatements. She advised that this new finding is reported as a material
weakness based on the materiality of the amount of the misstatement. She added this finding can
be fixed and did not expect that this finding would be repeated next year.
Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Roth, to approve the 2011 Audit
as presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. Finance Department 2011 Annual Report. Shelly Rueckert, Finance Director, presenting.
Finance Director Rueckert presented the 2011 Finance Department's Annual Report and stated
the Finance Department's role is to safeguard the City's assets as well as to create an efficient
environment for all City departments to maintain the best bottom line possible. She advised that
in 2011, the City increased its General Fund balance by $78,137 and the fund balance at the end
of 2011 exceeded the fund balance policy by $307,286. She indicated the City refunded two
bond issues during 2011 saving the City approximately $176,000 in future interest. She stated
the City's 2011 health care costs came in less than 2010 actual costs. She reviewed 2011 grant
activity stating that since 1999, the City has received $15 million in grants, which is $1,855 per
resident. She stated in 2012, the City secured a contract with MWMO to provide accounting
services as well as a contract to provide utility billing services to the City of Birchwood. She
indicated in March 2012, the City refunded three bond issues saving the City $637,640 in future
interest payments and issued bonds for the 2012 street improvement project. She added the City
learned today that it will receive $838,000 for prior street reconstruction expenditures from MSA
Advanced Encumbrance Fund. She advised that ongoing activities of the Finance Department
include preparation of the 2013 budget, decertification of the Chandler TIF District, and
researching of options for replacing the City's financial software. She noted the Finance
Department has focused its efforts on the sustainability of the City's financial models, as well as
ensuring the City's budget is structurally balanced and implementing technological tools to gain
workload capacity to accomplish the City's future service needs.
Mayor Faust and the City Council commended Finance Director Rueckert for her efforts on
behalf of the City.
E�
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2012
Page 6
C. Resolution 12-068; Authorizing the Remarketing of Variable Rate Demand Multifamily
Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (The Landings at Silver Lake Village Project), Series
2007 and Authorizing the Execution of Documents. Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers &
Associates, presenting.
7 Ms. Kvilvang explained that the State issues multifamily housing revenue bonds that can only be
8 accessed through the City acting as a conduit. She stated in 2004, Dominium requested the City
9 act as a conduit on their behalf when it built The Landings and due to the tax exempt status of
10 those bonds, the developer is responsible for making sure they are following the tax exempt
11 guidelines for those bonds. She advised the developer is refinancing these bonds and intends to
12 take a $31.1 million HUD mortgage and the balance of $6.4 million will be remarketed. She
13 stated in reviewing the pro forma, the Conduit Bonds will be interest only and there is more than
14 adequate cash flow to cover the payments. She indicated the City is required to enter into an
15 Indenture of Trust with US Bank, as well as a Loan Agreement and Remarketing Circular and
16 the City will incur no fees as a result of the remarketing. She introduced Mr. Mark Morehouse
17 from Dominium and Mr. David Doran from Dougherty & Company, LLC.
18
19 Motion by Councilmember Roth, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 12-
20 068; Authorizing the Remarketing of Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue
21 Refunding Bonds ("rhe Landings at Silver Lake Village Project), Series 2007 and Authorizing
22 the Execution of Documents.
23
24 Motion carried unanimously
25
26 VI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
27
28 City Manager Casey — No report.
29
30 Councilmember Jenson reported on his attendance at the June 21-22, 2012, League of Minnesota
31 Cities annual conference in Duluth.
32
33 Councilmember Roth reported on his attendance at the June 21-22, 2012, League of Minnesota
34 Cities annual conference.
35
36 Councilmember Stille reported on his attendance at the June 21-22, 2012, League of Minnesota
37 Cities annual conference.
38
39 Councilmember Gray — No report.
40
41 Mayor Faust reported on his attendance at the June 21-22, 2012, League of Minnesota Cities
42 annual conference. He stated the City was recognized as a Greenstep City at the annual
43 conference and noted there are only 46 cities currently participating in the Greenstep program.
44 He indicated that the City achieved Level 3 status and the only other cities that have reached
45 Level 3 status are Eagan, Edina, and Falcon Heights. He thanked City staff for their efforts in
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2012
Page 7
achieving Level 3 status and noted the City did not spend any additional money to participate in
the Greenstep program.
VII. COMMUNITY FORUM.
Mayor Faust invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items that
are not on the regular agenda.
Mr. Leslie Davis, 1822 Marshall Street NE, appeared before the City Council and stated he is a
candidate for Hennepin County Commissioner and presented the City Council with information
regarding his candidacy.
Mayor Faust stated the Community Forum was not a political forum and the City Council
meeting was an inappropriate place to talk about political office.
VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
Mayor Faust noted there are currently no items scheduled for the July 10, 2012, City Council
meeting and asked the City Council to consider canceling the meeting.
Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Roth, to cancel the July 10,
2012, Regular Meeting of the City Council.
IX. ADJOURNMENT.
Mayor Faust adjourned the meeting at 7:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara Hughes
TimeSaver OffSite Secretarial, Inc.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Motion carried unanimously.
9
10
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Saint Anthony Village
DA'L'E:
July 24, 2012 Approved:
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM:
License Clerk
ITEM:
License and Permits for Approval:
Construction, Maple Grove, MN
Sign, St Paul, MN
Climate Makers, Brooklyn Center, MN
Fireside Hearth & Home, Roseville, MN
Genz Ryan Plumbing & Heating, Burnsville, MN
Uptown Heating & Cooling, Minneapolis, MN
Yale Mechanical, Bloomington, MN
Applicant: Tamela Walhof
Location: 2501 -- 2503 33`d Ave
Applicant: Allen Kluz
Location:
2516 — 2518 37°i Ave
Location:
2600 — 2602 37°i Ave
Applicant:
Nikki Mason
Location:
2702 37°i Ave
Applicant:
Nativity Lutheran Church
Location:
3329 Belden Dr
Location:
3331 Belden Dr
Location:
3335 Belden Dr
Applicant:
Andrew Borgert
Location:
3101 Bell Ln
Applicant: John Sullivan
Location: 2613 Lowry Ave
Applicant: Walker on Kenzie
Location: 2626 Kenzie Ter
Yohan Holdings
4021 Macalaster Dr
11
12
Applicant:
John Tuohy
Location:
2601 Pahl Ave
Applicant:
Holly Brennaise
Location:
4008 Penrod Ln
Applicant:
Thomas Fritz
Location:
3302 Roosevelt Ct
Applicant:
ASI Hennepin County
Location:
3512 Silver Lake Rd
US BANK
CITY OF ST, ANTHONY
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR #
PAYEE
CHECK #
DATE
AMOUNT
9425
MN AWWA
18009
6/21/2012
$150.00
9590
U.S BANK (PURCHASING)
18010
6/21/2012
$1,264.97
9366
WAL-MART BUSINESS CENTER
18011
6/21/2012
$20.18
20
AA BATTERY CO
18017
7/11/2012
$261.20
8964
ACCLAIM BENEFITS
18018
7/11/2012
$20.00
8621
ALLIANCE MECHANICAL
18019
7/11/2012
$3,068.00
9256
ALLIED MEDICAL PRODUCTS
18020
7/11/2012
$429.90
8268
AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS
18021
7/11/2012
$78.00
9943
ARAMARK
18022
7/11/2012
$142.18
4293
BELLBOY CORP.
18023
7/11/2012
$24,089.81
9778
BERNICK'S
18024
7/11/2012
$704.20
9933
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
18025
7/11/2012
$1,797.50
9479
BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP
18026
7/11/2012
$450.00
7253
BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHO
18027
7/11/2012
$33.19
9565
BROADWAY AWARDS
18028
7/11/2012
$52.37
4231
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
18029
7/11/2012
$45,849.41
9985
CARTER/PAIGE
18030
7/11/2012
$12.93
9953
CASEY/MARK
18031
7/11/2012
$327.47
.0393
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
18032
7/11/2012
$24.00
4065
CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO
18033
7/11/2012
$261.27
9157
CHISAGO COUNTY
18034
7/11/2012
$3,104.12
4080
CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTI
18035
7/11/2012
$105.90
8154
CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON
18036
7/11/2012
$2,080.00
8275
CITY OF ST. PAUL
18037
7/11/2012
$320.00
4805
CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE COM
18038
7/11/2012
$478.30
4095
COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA
18039
7/11/2012
$577.80
4101
COMMERS CONDITIONED WATE
18040
7/11/2012
$140.86
4107
COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLN
18041
7/11/2012
$3,823.99
9820
CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE
18042
7/11/2012
$631.88
7178
D-ROCK CENTER & SMALL EN
18043
7/11/2012
$71.78
.0391
DEAN/CECIL
18044
7/11/2012
$20.93
9343
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & IN
18045
7/11/2012
$772.75
820
DORSEY & WHITNEY
18046
7/11/2012
$19,666.38
4135
ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC
18047
7/11/2012
$221.23
8604
EMERGENCY APPARATUS
18048
7/11/2012
$425.13
9061
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TEC
18049
7/11/2012
$484.89
.0392
EMERSON/EDWARD B.
18050
7/11/2012
$113.54
8697
EXTREME BEVERAGE
18051
7/11/2012
$424.00
8251
FAUST/JERRY
18052
7/11/2012
$199.09
9229
FIRSTLAB
18053
7/11/2012
$134.85
1030
G & K SERVICES INC
18054
7/11/2012
$808.40
9986
GAMMELL/KENNETH
18055
7/11/2012
$36.00
8120
GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS
18056
7/11/2012
$728.81
8127
GRAFIX SHOPPE
18057
7/11/2012
$900.00
4172
GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.
18058
7/11/2012
$1,533.25
1.3
U§ BANK
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR #
PAYEE
CHECK #
DATE
AMOUNT
9983
GRAYBAR
18059
7/11/2012
$1,082.62
1420
HAWKINS, INC
18060
7/11/2012
$1,379.45
8221
HEDBACK, ARENDT, KOHL
18061
7/11/2012
$3,500.00
9932
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE
18062
7/11/2012
$45,325.88
4207
HOHENSTEIN'S, INC
18063
7/11/2012
$11,440.02
8252
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC
18064
7/11/2012
$203.41
9865
HOSTWAY GLOBAL WEB SOLUT
18065
7/11/2012
$77.70
4105
INLAND TRS PROPERTY MANA
18066
7/11/2012
$1,704.93
98191ENSON/JAN
18067
7/11/2012
$358.60
4125
JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING
18068
7/11/2012
$59,733.22
4220
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
18069
7/11/2012
$62,387.94
9971
KUECHLE UNDERGROUND
18070
7/11/2012
$283,868.96
9982
LAERDAL MEDICAL CORPORAT
18071
7/11/2012
$50.77
9851
LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLO
18072
7/11/2012
$1,250.44
8434
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI
18073
7/11/2012
$350.00
2040
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE
18074
7/11/2012
$360.00
8229
LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
18075
7/11/2012
$211.53
9114
M. AMUNDSON LLP
18076
7/11/2012
$2,126.56
2160
MARSHALL CONCRETE PROD
18077
7/11/2012
$511.25
2240
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
18078
7/11/2012
$48,356.43
8279
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
18079
7/11/2012
$2,341.35
8467
MIDWAY FORD
18080
7/11/2012
$66.69
9930
MINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC
18081
7/11/2012
$118,485.25
8850
MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY
18082
7/11/2012
$1,158.00
2395
MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC
18083
7/11/2012
$430.06
9984
MULTICARE ASSOCIATES OF
18084
7/11/2012
$81.00
5232
MURPHY'S SERVICE CENTER
18085
7/11/2012
$23.71
8996
NEEDHAM DISTRIBUTING CO
18086
7/11/2012
$368.95
8883
NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY
18087
7/11/2012
$175.00
8519
NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION C
18088
7/11/2012
$63,509.23
9523
NORTHSTAR INSPECTION SER
18089
7/11/2012
$4,615.33
9987
NUCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
18090
7/11/2012
$179.80
45
OFFICE DEPOT
18091
7/11/2012
$113.07
9615
PAETEC
18092
7/11/2012
$234.49
4354
PAUSTIS & SONS
18093
7/11/2012
$2,107.25
4360
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
18094
7/11/2012
$9,860.13
7057
PRAXAIR
18095
7/11/2012
$19.81
9988
RUECKERT/SHELLY
18096
7/11/2012
$154.48
8199
SIGNATURE CONCEPTS, INC.
18097
7/11/2012
$195.09
9127
SIMPLEXGRINNELL
18098
7/11/2012
$133.00
8983
SOULO DESIGN, INC
18099
7/11/2012
$200.00
9843
SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS
18100
7/11/2012
$13,623.93
9259
SPRINT
18101
7/11/2012
$260.00
4782
ST ANTHONY VILLAGE CENTE
18102
7/11/2012
$2,455.26
9167
ST. ANTHONY -NEW BRIGHTON
18103
7/11/2012
$26,087.78
3490
STREICHER'S
18104
7/11/2012
$656.21
US BANK CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CHECK REGISTER 1 5
VENDOR # PAYEE
4780 SURLY BREWING CO
5273 TESSMAN SEED INC.
9989 THE HARTFORD
7337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE
3560 TRACY PRINTING
9580 TWIN CITIES FLAG SOURCE,
8449 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
8010 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
8336 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
8227 VERIZON WIRELESS
4451 VINOCOPIA
9702 W.D. LARSON COMPANIES LT
8316 WINE COMPANY/THE
8310 WINE MERCHANTS INC
4175 WIRTZ BEVERAGE - (GRIGGS
9734 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
TOTAL
CHECK #
DATE
AMOUNT
18105
7/11/2012
$2,538.00
18106
7/11/2012
$879.82
18107
7/11/2012
$89.80
18108
7/11/2012
$407.30
18109
7/11/2012
$209.48
18110
7/11/2012
$192.38
18111
7/11/2012
$488.75
18112
7/11/2012
$137.96
18113
7/11/2012
$126.71
18114
7/11/2012
$930.04
18115
7/11/2012
$546.17
18116
7/11/2012
$43.22
18117
7/11/2012
$1,043.95
18118
7/11/2012
$1,992.56
18119
7/11/2012
$12,019.82
18120
7/11/2012
$37,303.79
18121
7/11/2012
$10,643.04
$958,247.83
BANK
CITY OF ST ANTHONY
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR #
PAYEE
CHECK #
DATE
AMOUNT
20
AA BATTERY CO
18123
7/25/2012
$106.79
8242
AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERV
18124
7/25/2012
$111.82
9250
AMERICAN MESSAGING
18125
7/25/2012
$179.77
8450
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES,
18126
7/25/2012
$248.00
5216
ANOKA TECHNICAL INSTITUT
18127
7/25/2012
$400.00
7201
APACHE GROUP
18128
7/25/2012
$755.51
4687
ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC
18129
7/25/2012
$108.83
.0394
ASSURANT
18130
7/25/2012
$417.76
9871
BDI - GOPHER BEARING
18131
7/25/2012
$117.58
4293
BELLBOY CORP.
18132
7/25/2012
$11,138.77
9778
BERNICK'S
18133
7/25/2012
$935.50
8555
BIFFS,INC.
18134
7/25/2012
$191.93
9060
BLAINE LOCK & SAFE INC.
18135
7/25/2012
$105.52
4662
BOURGET IMPORTS
18136
7/25/2012
$243.00
9922
BUREAU OF CRIM APPREHENS
18137
7/25/2012
$510.00
4231
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
18138
7/25/2012
$18,055.95
2380
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
18139
7/25/2012
$1,095.18
4065
CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO
18140
7/25/2012
$19.08
9907
CENTURYLINK
18141
7/25/2012
$355.97
4080
CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTI
18142
7/25/2012
$4,561.00
9056
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
18143
7/25/2012
$5,494.56
8814
CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE
18144
7/25/2012
$16.03
4805
CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE COM
18145
7/25/2012
$228.45
4095
COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA
18146
7/25/2012
$376.12
9820
CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE
18147
7/25/2012
$941.71
807
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS
18148
7/25/2012
$633.56
4110
DICKSON ELECTRIC
18149
7/25/2012
$4,012.00
8742
DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCI
18150
7/25/2012
$60.89
9798
FERGUSON WATERWORKS
18151
7/25/2012
$199.47
8637
FLANAGAN SALES
18152
7/25/2012
$1,086.92
9990
FLEETPRIDE
18153
7/25/2012
$5.59
9236
FSH COMMUNICATIONS
18154
7/25/2012
$64.13
1030
G & K SERVICES INC
18155
7/25/2012
$792.37
1110
GENERAL INDUSTRIALSUPPL
18156
7/25/2012
$21.97
9854
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
18157
7/25/2012
$275.50
4172
GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.
18158
7/25/2012
$74.25
9235
GRAY/NAL
18159
7/25/2012
$356.71
.0395
HARRISON/M.
18160
7/25/2012
$8.11
8944
HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT
18161
7/25/2012
$1,756.67
9932
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE
18162
7/25/2012
$652.59
4207
HOHENSTEIN'S, INC
18163
7/25/2012
$5,250.50
8252
HOME DEPOT CREDITSERVIC
18164
7/25/2012
$75.31
8658
INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, 1
18165
7/25/2012
$85.50
8016
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE
18166
7/25/2012
$135.00
4125
JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING
18167
7/25/2012
$43,145.14
US BANK
CITY OF ST ANTHONY
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR #
PAYEE
CHECK #
DATE
AMOUNT
4220
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
18168
7/25/2012
$30,770.82
9991
KLEIN/CHRIS
18169
7/25/2012
$70.00
4229
LARSON/MICHAEL
18170
7/25/2012
$238.22
9729
LIFT BRIDGE BEER CO.
18171
7/25/2012
$560.00
2040
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE
18172
7/25/2012
$52.25
8229
LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
18173
7/25/2012
$880.08
9114
M. AMUNDSON LLP
18174
7/25/2012
$2,465.02
9823
MAILFINANCE
18175
7/25/2012
$142.22
8467
MIDWAY FORD
18176
7/25/2012
$1,475.38
2280
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
18177
7/25/2012
$25.00
9195
MISTER CAR WASH
18178
7/25/2012
$97.96
8767
NSRMAA
18179
7/25/2012
$50.00
45
OFFICE DEPOT
18180
7/25/2012
$986.85
8528
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES
18181
7/25/2012
$431.00
9800
PAUL CONWAY SHIELDS
18182
7/25/2012
$263.98
4354
PAUSTIS & SONS
18183
7/25/2012
$1,604.96
9563
PETTY CASH - U.S. BANK
18184
7/25/2012
$138.71
4360
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
18185
7/25/2012
$5,217.38
4361
PINNACLE DIST.
18186
7/25/2012
$535.80
9119
RECHECK
18187
7/25/2012
$15.00
9567
ROTH/JAMES
18188
7/25/2012
$170.53
9340
ROYAL CONCRETE PIPE INC
18189
7/25/2012
$397.58
9988
RUECKERT/SHELLY
18190
7/25/2012
$165.96
9680
SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS
18191
7/25/2012
$666.60
3315
SL-SERCO
18192
7/25/2012
$1,000.00
9843
SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS
18193
7/25/2012
$8,691.29
9928
SPAIN'S TREE SERVICE, LL
18194
7/25/2012
$1,026.00
4782
ST ANTHONY VILLAGE CENTE
18195
7/25/2012
$3,589.02
1810
ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE KIWA
18196
7/25/2012
$169.00
2420
STAR TRIBUNE
18197
7/25/2012
$76.00
9915
STEVE'S APPLIANCES, INC.
18198
7/25/2012
$193.66
3490
STREICHER'S
18199
7/25/2012
$5,140.49
4780
SURLY BREWING CO
18200
7/25/2012
$985.00
3260
T A SCHIFSKY & SONS
18201
7/25/2012
$226.93
9842TASC-
CLI ENTINVOICES
18202
7/25/2012
$100.00
9264
TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD.
18203
7/25/2012
$5,455.00
7337
TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE
18204
7/25/2012
$275.05
9934
TOUCHLESS TUNNEL WASH
18205
7/25/2012
$96.19
3560
TRACY PRINTING
18206
7/25/2012
$1,637.33
7330
TRI STATE BOBCAT, INC.
18207
7/25/2012
$6,041.22
8449
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
18208
7/25/2012
$609.02
3630
TWIN CITY SAW CO.
18209
7/25/2012
$24.11
9590
U.S. BANK (PURCHASING
18210
7/25/2012
$3,651.41
8270
UNITED STATES POSTAL SER
18211
7/25/2012
$700.00
8227
VERIZON WIRELESS
18212
7/25/2012
$329.36
4451
VINOCOPIA
18213
7/25/2012
$236.25
1.7
Mil
CITY OF ST ANTHONY
CHECK REGISTER
9366 WAL-MART BUSINESS CENTER
18214
7/25/2012
$13.76
US BANK
4494 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -M
18215
7/25/2012
$1,092.89
8887 WELLS FARGO BANK MACN93
18216
7/25/2012
$400.00
8316 WINE COMPANY/THE
18217
7/25/2012
$286.30
8310 WINE MERCHANTS INC
18218
7/25/2012
$1,281.33
4175 WIRTZ BEVERAGE - (GRIGGS
18219
7/25/2012
$9,942.11
9734 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
18220
7/25/2012
$17,365.79
8273 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
18221
7/25/2012
$79,780.05
2680 XCEL ENERGY
18222
7/25/2012
$10,679.76
7325 YOCUM OIL COMPANY, INC.
18223
7/25/2012
$19,696.52
TOTAL $333,619.15
FUNDS WIRED FOR BOND PAYMENTS DUE AUGUST 1 2012
BOND TRUST SERVICES
$167,375.89
US BANK
$180,275.00
WELLS FARGO BANK
$320,425.70
TOTAL $668,076.59
GRAND TOTAL $1,001,695.74
A
WSB
& Associates, Inc.
Engineering ■ Planning w Environmental ■ Construction
July 16, 2012
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
c/o Mark Casey
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418-1603
Re: 2012 Storm Water Improvement Project
St. Anthony Village, MN
WSB Project No. 1626-570
Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff:
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
We have solicited the following directional drilling companies for quotes to complete the 2012 Storm
Water Improvement Project at Emerald Park:
1. Ellingson Drainage, Inc.
2. E.J. Mayers, Inc.
3. Red Peterson Utilities, Inc.
4. Earth Burners, Inc.
We received quotes from E.J. Mayers, Inc. and Ellingson Drainage, Inc. The low quote was received
from E.J. Mayers, Inc. at $51,235.00.
We recommend the City Council award the contract to E.J. Mayers, Inc. A resolution awarding the bid
for the 2012 Storm Water Improvement Project is enclosed for your consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 763-287-7182.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Todd E. Hubmer, PE
City Engineer
Enclosures
Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
FXO-61 MeningOO125072520121L7R•lance-071612,da x
24
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 12-069
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A BID
FOR THE 2012 STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to a request for quotes for the improvement as shown on the plan for the above -
referenced project, quotes were received, opened and tabulated, and the following quotes
were received complying with the request:
Contractor
Total Bid
E.J. Mayers Inc. $51,235.00
Ellingson Drainage Inc. $63,710.00
WHEREAS, it appears that E.J. Mayers, Inc. of Hamel, MN is the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, of the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village:
1. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with E.J
Mayers, Inc. in the amount of $51,235.00 in the name of the City of St. Anthony Village, Minnesota for
the improvement outlined in the above -referenced project according to the plans and specifications,
therefore, approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The Engineer, WSI3 & Associates, Inc., is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their quotes once the contract has been signed.
Adopted this 24°i day of Jim, 2012.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
Mayor
City Manager
/0( cd Afmm,, X2011`011,1101211l,,,A�,ardn, Qrm,for lmprm emrm.r-Kne... Ab ,,
21
22
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
A
WSB
& Associates, Inc.
■ Planning ■ Environmental ■ Construction
July 18, 2012, 2012
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
c/o Mark Casey
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony Village, MN 55418-1603
Re: Silver Lake Road LED Pedestrian Crossing
Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff:
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
We have solicited and received quotes for the materials and installation of LED Pedestrian Lighting for the
34"' Avenue and Silver Lake Road cross -walk improvements. The project costs are:
Lighting Materials (TAPCO) $27,958.99
Installation (Kilmer Electric Co) $26,592.50
Total Construction Cost $54,551.49
Attached for your consideration is a resolution awarding the installation of the LED Pedestrian Lighting to
Kilmer Electric Co. and the purchase of materials to TAPCO. Upon approval by the City Council we
anticipate installation will occur in mid to late August.
If you have any questions concerning the above -referenced project, please feel free to contact either of us at
763-541-4800.
Sincerely,
WSB &c Associates, Inc.
" r-
Janelle Borgen, PE, PTOE Justin Messner, PE
ITS Manager Project Manager
Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
C.lUurslBwb-SKiukAppDalalLa [Wicmof95Windo%AslTen+pomry•inlcmd File%Conlcnf.Ouilook%BAFSZFIKll.TR-bincc-071812.docc
23
24
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
`'d TA P C �ry Traffic &Parking Control Company, Inc.
5100 W. Brown Deer Road, Brown neer, WI 53223
P800-236-0112 i www.tapconet.com I F 500.444.0331
SALES QUOTE
Number Q103296
Dale 9/912011
Page 1
25
Sell To
WS$ & Associates
Ship To
WSB & Associates
25,942.00 EA $25,942.00
Janelle Borgen
Cust.
Janelle Borgen
Cust.
701 Xenia Ave South
102305
701 Xenia Ave South
6
Suite 300
EA
Suite 300
HEX SOCKET 318"X6MM WSW TS3840T
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
EA
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
Reference #
Expires
Slsp
Terms
Freight
Ship Via
RMB
6/29/2012
Rich L011i
Cash
PREPAID
BEST RATE
item Description �Quantity !!fir! Price UTA Extension
Crosswalk #2
2180 -SYSTEM
BlinkerSign / LaneLight System
1
EA
25,942.00 EA $25,942.00
102304
LANEL[GHT MODULES AMBER MLK150 TR Y
8
EA
EA
102305
LEVELING TOOL (SNOW) LLIPS
6
EA
EA
102306
HEX SOCKET 318"X6MM WSW TS3840T
2
EA
EA
102307
BACKER ROD #1TPSOFROD5/8
250
LF
LF
102308
RE -ENTERABLE GEL #8882 750G
3
EA
EA
102309
ITEM -FLEX EPDXY #IT -F PER GAL
16 GALLO
GALLO
N
N
102310
LANELIGHT CONTROLLER #LLMK2BXW24
1
EA
EA
105459
AC Transformer, heavy duty
1
EA
EA
105460
NEMA 3R Enclosure 12x10x6 LLN3R
1
EA
EA
102311
WATERPROOF WIRE CONNECTORS #62135
35
EA
EA
102312
LANELIGHT WATER BLOCK CONTROL CABLE
275
LF
LF
#LLWBXW1813
102313
LANELIGHT PUSHBUTTON CABLE
200
LF
LF
#LLWBPBI8/3
102315
INTERFACE FOR TAPCO SIGNS 4MT24 FL
4
EA
EA
2180-00258 W11-2,30"DG3 FYG,PED XING SYM 2 EA EA
BLINKERSIGN,12VDC INPUT,8 LEDS
373-05863 W16-7PL,24X12X.080 DG3 FYG,DOWN 2 EA EA
DIAGONAL ARROW LEFT,W/OVERLAY
107016 Polara Pushbutton X2 Push button or Bulldog 2 EA EA
with frame and sign BDLM2-X
Shipment within Merchandise Misc Tax Total
Acceptance By - -
Date
By
THANK YOU FOR CALLING TAPCO!!! THIS OFFER IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON REVERSE SIDE
26
�, TA F-�"C+C]►aIP
5100 . Br Parking Cad, rolBrown
Company, 5 Inc.
510U W. Brown Deer Road. Brawn peer,4Vi 53223
800.236.0112 1 www.tapconet.cam I F 800.444.0331
The Business of Safety
SALES QUOTE
Number
0103296
Date
9/912011
Page
2
Sell To
WSB & Associates
Ship To
WSB & Associates
C313Cust,
Janelle Borgen
CL'St,
Janelle Borgen
701 Xenia Ave South
701 Xenia Ave South
101800
Suite 300
1 KT
Suite 300
SP TRAFFIC
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
EA
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
Reference #
Expires
Slsp
Terms
Freight
Ship Via
RMB
6129/2012
Rich Lolli
Cash
PREPAID
BEST RATE
ke111
Description
Quantity um
Price Ufid Extension
SP TRAFFIC
Decorative pole assembly for Blinkersigns 12' x
2 EA
EA
3" bolt down base
101800
POLE MOUNTING KIT, 3"
1 KT
KT
SP TRAFFIC
318 Flexible conduit wlfitings
EA
EA
FOB: Minneapolis, MN
Lead time is appox 4 weeks
Thank you - Rich Lolli at TAPCO
Direct ph # 877-699-7810
rlolli@tapconet.com
Cell # 770-329-2278
Fax # 770-979-9363
Shipment within
Acceptance By
Date
By
Merchandise
Misc
Tax
Total
$25,942.00
$2,016.99
$27,958.99
THANK YOU FOR CALLING TAPCOM THIS OFFER IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON REVERSE SIDE
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 12-070
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A BID FOR 2012 LED PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
IMPROVEMENTS AT 34"' AVENUE AND SILVER LAKE ROAD PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to a request for bids for the improvement as shown on the plan for the above -
referenced project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the
following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Contractor Total Bid
Killmer Electric Co., Inc. $26,592.50
Egan Company $28,210.00
Design Electric, Inc. $39,367.20
WHEREAS, it appears that Killmer Electric Co., Inc. of Crystal, MN is the lowest responsible
bidder.
NOW, THERI!'FORE, BE IT RESOLVED, of the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with
Killmer Electric Co., Inc. in the amount of $26,592.50 in the name of the City of St. Anthony,
Minnesota for the improvement outlined in the above -referenced project according to the plans
and specifications, therefore, approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
2. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to purchase the Tapco
Crosswalk System in the amount of $27,958.99 from Tapco Traffic and Parking Control Co., Inc.
of Brown Deer, WI as per the attached quote.
Adopted this 24th day of July, 2012.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
11. Cou,xd b/eming.v 2012'.09241012 ]?,,'luom../or Aunrdn, 1➢d,/'r Silver Il Rd 1.hD Ped Crossing.&',,
27
s
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
� "" d
? r y 5 x. �..
� li �(.'.�_in��..{r�4ril H =1�T� ��T.�J.'.:rr��'�
�a
.. h �} i� sr u{ 3� T � "� , }: � � y �, � i� , � � ,, , i ' �n is i � � { ..
�=.`. _ .'t �'1.ca'lr�'�5�� �3`?yitL�S�...�d i`L`CNRNI}t-_ i i`. .� w ��!'+. }- :�C7c�5 ! k ..: ,..�. ..v _._ �.. " �'� %�� .u:i�� .
A
WSB
&Associates, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE MEMORANDUM
To: St. Anthony Village City Council
From: Jacqueline Corkle, PTP, AICP Interim City Planner
Date: July 18, 2012
City Council Regular Meeting for July 24, 2012
WSB Project No. 01626-630
Request: Request for a Variance to the Rear Yard Setback to allow for the
construction of a garage at 3207 Silver Lake Road
RECOMMENDATION
The Applicant's request for a variance for a reduction in the rear yard setback for the construction of a
garage is reasonable and consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Based on review, the Planning
Commission recommends approval of the requested variance for the property located at 3207 Silver Lake
Road subject to the conditions as outlined in the resolution.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: David and Meridith Socha
Owner: Same as above
Location: 3207 Silver Lake Road
Existing Land Use / Low Density Residential/zoned: R1; Single Family
Zoning:
Surrounding Land North: Low Density Residential; zoned R1; Single Family
Use / Zoning: East: Low Density Residential; zoned R1; Single Family
South: Low Density Residential; zoned R1; Single Family
West: Low Density Residential; zoned R1; Single Family
Deadline for Agency Application Date: 05-16-12
Action: 60 Days: 07-14-12
Letter Sent: 06-20-12
120 Days: 09-12-12
CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE PROPOSED VARIANCE
1. Background
The property owners wish to construct a detached garage at 3207 Silver Lake Road. The property
currently does not have a garage. The proposed garage is 27 feet by 24 feet for a total of 648 square
feet. The garage has been proposed to be located 30 feet from the side street lot line and 15 feet from
the rear of the lot. As shown in Exhibit A, the front of the property is located on Silver Lake Road.
Silver Lake Road is the property address and it is where the front door to the house is located. As
such, the area between Silver Lake Road and the home is considered to be the front yard. The
driveway, however, provides access to the property off of l-lilldale Avenue.
29
30
July 18, 2012
page 2
As proposed, a variance would be needed for the rear yard setback (31 feet is the required distance).
Originally, the Applicant had pursued a different design, but it was determined that design was
incompatible with Silver Lake Road being the front of the parcel.
2. Overview
The property is a corner lot, situated at the junction of Silver Lake Road and Hilldale Avenue NE.
The front of the home faces Silver Lake Road and driveway access to the parcel is provided off of
Hilldale Avenue NE. The property is 80 feet wide and 155 feet long. The property is in the R-1
zoning district.
The 'Zoning Code requires a rear yard setback equal to the greater of 20 percent of the depth of the
entire lot or 25 feet (152.039 (G)). The setback for the property is 31 feet using the 20 percent rule.
Therefore, the variance is necessary due to the garage being proposed 15 feet from the rear lot line.
The City's Zoning Code has a provision for a garage setback permit. This option, however, limits the
property owner to a garage that is 528 square feet. The proposed garage is 648 square feet, so a
variance would be needed from the garage setback permit process. In discussing the situation with
the city attorney, there would be two options to pursue: I ) a rear yard setback variance or 2) a
variance from the garage setback permit process. Given the stipulations for the garage setback permit
process, legal and planning staff agreed that the cleaner approach to the variance is a simple rear yard
variance.
The property owners state that placing the garage completely outside the rear setback would place the
garage only 14 feet from the eastern wall of the house which would be harmful for several reasons.
The garage would block light coming into the dining room, affecting the enjoyment of the room. It
would also prohibit building any deck or patio off of the eastern wall of the house. Locating the
garage 14 feet from the home could also have an impact on drainage, as there would be limited space
between both structures, which could result in excessive storm water runoff and flooding in the
principal dwelling. The property owners have stated that an attached garage is not a feasible option,
as it would fundamentally change the character and form of the house. The only location for an
attached garage would be the eastern wall, which would require that the owners enter the garage
through the dining room. This action would result in the house not meeting the occupancy
requirements stated in the code (150.095 (A)).
3. Ordinance Authority.
Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section 152.039 Dimensional Regulations (G)
requires that the rear yard "must have a depth equal to the greater of 20% of the depth of the entire lot
or 25 feet" in the R 1 district. In this case, the 20 percent of the depth of the entire lot would apply.
This distance is 31 feet.
4. Criteria for Variance Approval. Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section 152.245,
(C) Evidence, lists the criteria the City Council must consider in determining whether to grant or deny
a variance. The applicable criteria include:
1. The subject matter of the application is within the scope of this section.
The application for a variance is necessary considering the location of the proposed garage does
not meet the required rear yard setback. Criteria met.
2. Strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because:
July 18, 2012
Page 3
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted
by the zoning code;
A garage does not currently exist on the property, which materially impacts the owners'
ability to use the property. Garages are common among most other homes in the
neighborhood. A detached garage is a permitted accessory structure in the R-1 zoning
district. Therefore, staff finds the proposal reasonable. Criteria met.
b. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not
created by the property owner;
T'he existing home was constructed at a time when present rules regarding setbacks were
not in existence. Additionally, the original construction did not include a garage or
consider the placement of a garage in the future. Because the setbacks were not in
existence the home was situated away from the two roadways. "Thus the home was
setback over 60 feet from Silver Lake Road without regard to providing a garage on the
site. The locations for siting a garage on site are limited to the rear and side yards. The
side yard in this case requires a 30 -foot setback because it is along a public street, thus
the options for locating a garage become even more limited. The rear yard becomes the
only location where a garage can be placed. Because the setback on the site is 3l feet,
there is limited space in which a garage can be constructed. These circumstances were
not created by the property owner. Criteria met.
c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
The proposed garage will not alter the essential character of the locality. Detached
garages are common within the City. The Applicant is proposing to construct the garage
in a manner that is consistent with the principal structure. The proposed use remains a
single family home in a single family neighborhood. Staff finds that the essential
character of the locality will not be changed. Criteria met.
d. Cconomic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties.
The Applicants wish to have a garage to protect their vehicles. Garages are typical to
most homes in Minnesota given the state's climate. Therefore, economic considerations
alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. Criteria met.
3. The variance, if granted, would be consistent with the city's comprehensive land use plan.
If the variance is granted, the use of the property would remain the same. The comprehensive
plan guides this area for single family use and adding the garage will not alter that use. Criteria
met.
4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning
code.
The intent of the zoning code is to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the city and
its people through the establishment of minimum regulations governing land development and
use. The zoning code is established to:
31
32
July 18, 2012
Page 4
a. Protect the use districts;
The proposal would not change the use of the property or create a disruption to the single
family use district. The current use as a single-family home is consistent with the City
Code. Criteria met.
b. Promote orderly development and redevelopment;
The proposal seeks to make an improvement to the property which staff finds to be
orderly. Criteria met.
c. Provide adequate light, air, and access to property;
The proposal would not negatively impact adequate light or air from reaching the
property or adjacent properties. "File proposed garage will be 15 feet from the rear
property line which should allow for adequate light, air, and access to the neighboring
property given the height of the proposed garage and spacing with structures on adjacent
properties. Criteria met.
d. Prevent congestion in the public streets;
The proposal will have no impact on the amount of congestion in the public street.
Criteria met.
e. Prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of structures by regulating land,
buildings, yards, and densities;
The proposed improvement will add a garage to a property where one currently does not
exist. It will not result in overcrowding of the land or an undue concentration of
structures. Approving the variance to allow the garage would not put the property over
the maximum amount of impervious surface allowed by the zoning code. In addition, a
detached garage is a permitted accessory use and is common among other homes in the
neighborhood. Criteria met.
f. Provide for compatibility of different land uses;
The proposal will not result in a change of land use, not, will it conflict with adjacent land
uses. Criteria met.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission unanimously voted in favor of recommending the requested variance subject
to the conditions outlined in the resolution.
POTENTIAL ACTION
1. Approve (with or without conditions) the Variance. In the event of approval (with or without
conditions), the City Council may refer to Exhibit C and may modify the draft resolution for
approval to include any conditions that it deems necessary.
2. Deny the Variance. In the event the City Council chooses denial of the requested variance, it
should clearly state its reasons for the denial recommendation.
ATTACHMENTS
July 18, 2012
Page 5
• Resolution 12-071; Approving a variance to the rear yard setback for the property located at 3207
Silver Lake Road
• Exhibit A: Location Map
• Exhibit 13: Applicant's Application
•
PowerPoint Presentation dated July 24, 2012
33
34
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
35
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 12-071
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE REAR YARD SETBACK
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3207 SILVER LAKE ROAD
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village received a request from the
Applicants David and Meridith Socha for a variance to the required rear yard setback for
the property located at 3207 Silver Lake Road on May 16, 2012, legally described as
follows:
THE SOUTI165 FEET OF THE NORTH 95 FEET OF THATPART OF THE WEST 1/5 OF
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 23, LYING W EST OF
THE EAST 75 FEETTHEREOF UPON WHICH JUDICIAL LANDMARKS HAVE BEEN
PLACED ON THE NORTHEAST AND SOU"DHEAS'I' CORNERS THEREOF;
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 30 FEET
OF THE WES'I' 1/5 OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF AS SHOWN IN DEED
DOC. NO. 456814.
WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested a variance to the required rear yard
setback in order to construct a garage on the property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the request
based on the related documents shown in the Applicants' application at their regular
meeting on July 17, 2012; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
St. Anthony Village approves the Applicants' variance request based on the following
findings:
The requested variance is consistent with all the standards for granting a
variance as described in Section 152.245 of the St. Anthony Village Zoning
Code. More specifically, the City Council finds that the requested variance is
justified for the following reasons:
a. The property owner is proposing to use their property in a reasonable
manner not permitted by the zoning code. The proposed improvement
will add a garage to a property where one currently does not exist.
Garages are a permitted accessory use in the R -I zoning district and are
common among most other homes in the neighborhood.
There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the property
owner. The existing home was constructed when present rules regarding
setbacks were not in existence. As a result, the home was built in a
location on the lot that limits the property owners' ability to meet the
setback requirements for most expansion projects.
36
a Granting the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Detached garages are common within the City and the applicant is
proposing to construct the garage in a manner that is consistent with the
principal structure. The use of the property will not change by granting the
variance.
d. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical
difficulties. The applicants wish to construct the garage in order to protect
their vehicles.
e. Granting the variance is consistent with the City's comprehensive land use
plan and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City's
Code relating to protecting the use districts. The use of the property will
remain the same as it is today.
f Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Code relating to promoting orderly development and
redevelopment. Allowing the garage at the proposed location on the
property is consistent with promoting orderly redevelopment.
g. Granting the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Code relating to providing adequate light, air and access to
property. The project will not impact adjacent properties in their ability to
receive adequate light and air, or to access their property.
h. Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Code relating to preventing congestion in public streets. The
project will have no impact on congestion.
Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Code to provide for compatibility of different land uses. The
project will have no impact on land use compatibility.
j. Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Code to prevent overcrowding of land and undue
concentration of structures by regulating land, buildings, yards and
densities. A detached garage is a permitted accessory use and is common
among other homes in the neighborhood. The proposed garage would not
put the property over the maximum amount of impervious surface. The
variance will not result in overcrowding or concentration of buildings.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council's
approval of the requested variance is contingent on the following:
1. The Applicant shall submit the appropriate plans and permits for review and
approval before beginning construction of the proposed garage.
2. The proposed garage shall at no point be closer than 10 feet from the rear
property line.
3. The Applicant is allowed to have one driveway serving the site. The proposed
garage includes the construction of a new paved driveway. The existing
driveway that serves the parcel shall be removed and replaced with a pervious
surface prior to issuing a final inspection for the garage.
APPROVED in the regular session of the City Council on July 24, 2012.
Attested:
Barb Sueiu, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
Mark Casey, City Manager
37
38
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
ain thon 3207 Silver Lake Rd N A
ills eC% Exhibit A Saint Anthony Village MN 0 50 100 A WSB
Feet a As"jaies, Inc.
40
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
EXHIBIT: B 41
tr
the'
3301 Silver Lake Road ° St. Anthony, MN 55418 • (p) 612,782.3301 ° (f) 612.782.3302
www.cisa int-anthony.muu. us
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Fee: $$60 Residential $100 Other Zoning Districts
A. GENERAL DATA
APPLICANT'S NAME; David & Merldith Socha
The above-named individual, firm, or corporation hereby respectfully submits the following information for the purpose of
Writing,' variance from existing land use zoning controls as found it the City of St. Anthony's Zoning Code.
Socha David 763-670-6763
Contact Person Last Name First Day Phone
It. PROJP.CTINFORMATION
1. Subject Property Address: 3207 Sliver Lake Road NE, St. Anthony, MN 65418-2405
2. Specify the nature of the project for which a variance is sought: New construction of a garage. No existing
garage on nremises __
3. Explain how you wish to vary firm the applicable provisions of the Ordinance:We desire to have a garage
-- ... Y^Wywrdst,lrlowuk
4. Explain in a written statement why Lite strict enforcement of the Ordinance would it . practical difficulties for pp
the applicant, preventing lite subject property to be used in a reasonable manner; that the plight of the landowner is due to SFS CG
circumstances unique to the property not created by Eire landowner; that the variance if granted, will not alter the essential
the character of the locality; and that economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. Please
address each of these items in your written statement. (City Code §152.245(0))
5. Check all additional supporting documents which are being submitted to help explain this project proposal:
W Site Plan` - f.7 Topographic Map 0 Other (specify) Front elevation; written statement
" Required Cru ntlnd, rtddifimrnllsgx to fiifly eridaht prolwal mr,t mord forwrionm.
I HffiiEEY CERTIFY wITH MY $IGNA'1'URF THAT ALL DATA ON MY APPLICATION FORMS, PLANS AND SPECIFICA'I IONS ARE TRUE AND
CORRECF TO THE n12ST OP MY KNOWLEDGP.
/%% ay 2-C) ! L
Date
I�
FXPIRXflCN U
Within one (1) year after the approval of a variance or appeal if the property owner or applicant has not substantially
started the construction of any building, structure, addition or alteration requested as part of the approval, said variance
shall become null and void unless all application for extension of lite approval has been submitted. A letter to extend
the approval of a variance shalt be submitted to fire Assistant City Manager not les than thirty (30) days before the
expiration of said Approval. Such letter shall state the fact for the request, showing a good faith attempt to utilize the
variance, and it shall state the additional tune being requested to begin the proposed construction. '11re City Council
may grant extensions not to exceed one (1) year. (Rev. July 2011)
F:\2011 website\ Varlance Amendment Application July 2011.doc
42
Legal Description
The South 65 feet of the North 95 feet of that part of the West 1/5 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the
Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 29, Range 23, lying West of the East 75 feet
thereof upon which Judicial Landmarks have been placed on the Northeast and Southeast Corners thereof;
Together with an easement for road purposes over the North 30 feet of the West 1/5 of the South Half of the North
Half as shown in deed Doc. No. 456814.
Logo] Description 1005352/50
43
15 May 2012
Ml.'MORANDUM FOR RFCORD
SUBJECT: Variance Justification Written Statement for Property located at 3207 Silver Lake
Road NE, St. Anthony, MN 55418-2405, Zoned R-1 Single Family District
1. General. ']'his memorandum serves as a written statement explaining why strict enforcement
of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for the applicants, David F. Socha and
Meridith.l.O. Socha.
2. References:
a. St. Anthony, Minnesota Code of Ordinances, dated 28 June 2011
3. Justification:
a. David and Meridith Socha, henceforth referred to as the property owners, desire to have a
variance from § 152.176 (1) St. Anthony, Minnesota Code of Ordinances, dated 28 June 2011.
The property owners desire to build a garage with dimensions 27' wide by 24' deep (total size
648 sq. 11.) of which 528 sq. ft. would be located in the rear setback o1'3207 Silver bake Road
NI, St. Anthony, MN 55418-2405, henceforth referred to as the property.
b. The property owners reside at 3207 Silver Lake Road NE, St. Anthony, MN 55418-2405.
This property is zoned R-1 Single Family District. Not having a garage materially aleck the use
of the property by the property owners. The property owners believe that a garage with
dimensions of 27' wide by 24' deep would not alter the essential character of the locality. In
addition a garage with the previously specified dimensions is consistent with existing homes and
current garage sizes. Building a garage would increase usability of the property and have a
positive affect on neighborhood property values.
c. Strict adherence to the ordinance would create a practical difficulty for the property owners
in the following ways:
i. Placing the garage completely outside of the rear setback of the property would place the
garage only 14' from the eastern wall of the house. This would block light coming into the
dining room, materially affecting use and enjoyment of the room. In addition, this would
effectively prohibit building any deck or patio off of the eastern wall of tine house, rendering the
existing sliding glass doors useless and materially detracting from the use of existing yard space.
ii. Placing the garage at a distance of 14' from the primary dwelling could also cause
several environmental and safety concerns. A limited distance between buildings increases fie
NINA
SUBMCF: Variance Justification Written Statement for Property located at 3207 Silver Lake
Road NG, St. Anthony, MN 55418-2405
hazards and could result in unnecessary damage to both structures and loss of property if either
were ever to catch on fire. Drainage is also a significant concern. Ilaving limited space between
both structures could cause large amounts of rain and storm water to be funneled into a small
space, potentially causing water problems and flooding in the principal dwelling, as well as
causing excessive storm water runoff into city sewage and drainage systems. This is further
exacerbated due to the clay soil on the property.
iii. Between 7 October 2011 and 14 October 2011, David Socha met with Kim Moore -
Sykes and was informed that she was willing to treat Hilldale Avenue as the front yard liar
purposes of garage construction. This information was relied upon when purchasing the property
insomuch as the property owners chose not to enact a garage contingency that was specified in
the purchase agreement with the previous owner. See appendix 2., excerpt from purchase
agreement dated 15 September 2011. On or about 15 November, after purchasing the property,
David met with Kim and presented a proposed site plan for a garage with dimensions 30' wide
by 24' deep. See appendix I, 3207 Silver lake Road Garage Proposal dated 14 October 2011,
for the original site plan. ']'his plat was approved by Kim Moorc-Sykes.
iv. An attached garage is an unacceptable option as it world fundamentally change tits
character and form of the house. In addition building an attached garage would be cost
prohibitive in the near-term future. Furthermore, the only location for an attached garage would
be oil the eastern wall of the house, transforming the dining room into a walkway to the garage,
and effectively eliminating the dining room. This would result in tine house not meeting
occupancy requirements under §150,095 (A), Maximum Occupancy, at such time when the
property owners have children.
4. The point of contact for this memorandum is the undersigned at phone 763-670-6763.
Fncls: DAVID 1". SOCHA
I Appendix 1 - 3207 Silver lake
Road Garage proposal dated
14 October 2011
2 Appendix 2 - Excerpt from
Purchase Agreement dated
15 September 2011
it
.o
o 0 0
O vol Ary' Vinixs-
d
45
0
K
f
p
f
46
3. AddondumlopurcAaN
A purohaso and *40 of
s,
ADCENDUMTO PURCHASE AOREEMENT
TAIek� neppromd DyagMllnafOtaMaOgapp00(n6AU0na•
Jth a�mteM 90N7erbta000 Uea of mwm of tANN fef;.
02006M4 M"ta ANeodeaaidacuions<, V.aTnp, MN
i. Dala f O l t
2, Pape _
ib.
(��}�.�\\ f9.
10.
2!.
23.
24,
26,
20.
27.
20.
29.
20,
02.yid
laokd (0'u) (OL)44
G4. THIS 19 A
eeN
24. WYOUDE&HIM 9OALOR'NAXADVC8,C0V404YfANAP
s11116(11106)
APPF 14 oSX I
1 '7
48
-Yi
3207 Silver Lake Road
Variance Request
City Council Meeting
July 24, 2012
ainnth�ny
I
is co
3207S. -aW�"'Rear Yard Setback
• General Information
Applicants: David & Meridith Socha
Owner: Same as above
Location: 3207 Silver Lake Road
Existing Land Use / Zoning: Low-density residential; R-1: Single family
Surrounding Land Use/ Zoning:
North: Low-density residential; zoned R-1; Single Family
East: Low-density residential; zoned R-1; Single Family
South: Low-density residential; zoned R-1; Single Family
West: Low-density residential; zoned 111; Single -Family
Gain nth�ny ___ �
Ifn C% WSB
7/18/2012 4 9
1
320
. ain thQiMy _.
aback
WSB
!ver lac�eitd Rear Yard Setback
• Rear Yard Setback Variance Overview
— The property owners are proposing to construct a
garage within the rear yard setback
— Code requires rear yard setback of 25 feet or 20
percent of lot depth (greater of the two)
— Rear yard setback for property is 31 feet
— The proposed garage is 27' x 24' (648 sq. ft.)
,. OMAN"
A*2
(%
7/18/2012
2
3247 Silver Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
k
r -
❑P
ain nth2ny
a C1
7/18/20125 1
3
i''
52
3207 Silver Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
• Rear Yard Setback variance Overview
— Discussions with legal counsel concur that a rear -
yard setback variance is appropriate
Proposed garage is 15 feet from the rear lot line
— A driveway exists off of Hilldale Avenue. if the
variance is granted, the exiting driveway would be
removed and a new driveway would be
constructed leading up to the garage
t 'WSB
3207 Silver Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
• Rear Yard Variance Overview
— Placing the garage within the rear setback would:
• Block sunlight to the dining room
• Prohibit future deck or patio
• Potential drainage issues
— Attached garage not feasible
• Would require entering through the living room
ain thQ►�y ---.._ A
a C1 Wse
7/18/2012
4
3207 Silver Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
* Variance Criteria Review
—The subject matter of the application is within the
scope of the variance process
— The property owner proposes to use the property
in a reasonable manner. Garages are a permitted
accessory use in the R-1 district and are common
among other homes in the neighborhood.
()aint ntlton L
C�p`i to e V WSe
3207 SiMr Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
.�_
• Variance Criteria Review
— Circumstances are unique to the property - not
caused by the property owner. The home was
constructed in a location on the lot that makes it
difficult to meet the rear -yard setback for most
expansion projects.
— If granted, the variance will not alter the essential
character of the locality
isWM
7/18/2012 5 3
9
3207 Silver Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
• Variance Criteria Review
— Economic considerations alone are not the basis
of the practical difficulties
• The Applicants wish to have a garage to protect their
vehicles
— The variance is consistent with the city's
comprehensive plan
aint nthorl
I fa cc/ WSG
3207 Silver Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
• Variance Criteria Review
— The variance would protect the land use district.
Present use is single family residential and the
variance would not alter that
— The variance allows for orderly redevelopment
— The variance will not reduce the amount of light,
air and access to surrounding properties
ainnthor___ �_. ___ A
I a eg WEB
7/18/2012
R+
3207 Silver Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
Variance Criteria Review
Granting the variance will not increase congestion
in the public streets
— The garage will not result in overcrowding of the
land or a concentration of structures
— Granting the variance will not alter the site's
compatibility with different land uses
. ain nkh�n
32 r Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
• Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the rear -
yard variance subject to the conditions
outlined in the resolution
The planning commission voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the variance at its July
171P 2012 meeting
Aw-
7/18/2012 5 5
II
7/18/2012
320' Silver Lake Rd Rear Yard Setback
Questions?
ain ntht ryr _ A
e a e WSB
& Associates, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4690
Fax: 763-541-1700
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE MEMORANDUM
To: St. Anthony Village City Council
From: Jacqueline Corkle, PTP, AICP Interim City Planner
Date: July 18, 2012
City Council Regular Meeting for July 24, 2012
WSB Project No. 01626-630
Request: Request for a Variance to the 30 -foot setback at 3700 Foss Road
RECOMMENDATION
The Applicant's request for a variance is reasonable and consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Based on review, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested three-foot variance
from the 30 -foot required setback from 37th Avenue NE subject to the conditions as outlined in Exhibit
C.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
Alan Plutowski from TWP Architects on behalf of St. Anthony Health Center
Owner:
St. Anthony Nursing Home LP
Location:
3700 Foss Road
Existing Land Use /
Institutional/zoned: R4; Multiple Dwellings
Zoning:
Surrounding Land
North: High Density Residential; zoned R-4; Multiple Dwellings
Use /Zoning:
South: Low Density Residential, Institutional: zoned R -IA Single Family Res;
R-2 Two Family Res; ROS Recreation/Open Space
East: High Density Residential; zoned R-4; Multiple Dwellings
West: High Density Residential; zoned R-4; Multiple Dwellings
Deadline for Agency
Application Date: 06-14-12
Action:
60 Days: 08-12-12
Letter Sent: N/A
120 Days: 10-11-12
CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE PROPOSED VARIANCE
1. Background
The St. Anthony Health Center wishes to construct a light well on the south side of its building at the
corner of Foss Road and 37th Avenue NE. The light well is intended to provide natural light into the
basement area where the physical therapy unit is located. Presently the area has no natural light. The
light well is proposed along the south side of the property, in front of the 30 -foot segment of the
building that protrudes out from the rest of the building. The proposed light well is slightly longer
than 23 feet and is five feet wide. The light well is less than three feet tall.
A variance is needed for the light well due to the fact that it encroaches into the required 30 -foot
setback along 37th Avenue NE (County Road D West).
57
58
July 18, 2012
Page 2
2. Overview
The property is located on a corner lot adjacent to Foss Road and 37th Avenue NE (County Road D
West). The property is in the R-4 District. The proposed addition is on the south side of the building
along 37th Avenue NE. The existing building is set back from the property line 32 feet. The required
setback for the property along 37th Avenue is 30 feet.
The proposed addition is approximately 23 and a half feet long and five feet wide, which will require
a 3 -foot variance from the setback along 37th Avenue NE. The proposed addition is approximately 21
feet, 8 inches feet from the sidewalk.
Although locating the light well in almost any other location would negate the need for a variance, the
applicant has expressed that the natural light is needed for the area in the basement that serves as the
physical therapy center. The physical therapy center is located in the area where the building juts out.
Placing the light well along the eastern side of the jut out is not practical and would require relocating
the gas line serving the site, relocating the gas meter and reworking the gas lines in the building.
Placing the light well along the western side of the jut out also would not work due to the location of
the electrical utilities and generator that are currently in place. Relocating these utilities would
involve significant construction.
In addition to the utility issues, the light needs to serve the area where the physical therapy unit is
located. Moving the light well to the other locations would not serve the physical therapy area.
Relocating the physical therapy unit within the building is also challenging. St. Anthony Health
Center is required to meet specific criteria for its operations, which makes moving different
operations from part of the building to another difficult without impacting some other function on
site. Therefore, the Owner would not be able to simply move its physical therapy operations to
another part of the building and provide a light well at a location that may be able to meet setback
requirements.
3. Criteria for Variance. Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 'Zoning Code, Section 152.245, (C)
Evidence, lists the criteria the City Council must consider in determining whether to grant or deny a
variance. The applicable criteria include:
1. ,The subject matter of the application is within the scope of this section.
The application for a variance is necessary considering the proposal would result in the building
extending beyond the required 30 -foot setback from 37th Avenue NE. Criteria met.
2. Strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because:
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted
by the zoning code;
The proposed light well is allowed by the zoning code with the only exception being that
the location of the light well would cause the building to no longer meet the required 30 -
foot setback. The light well is needed to provide natural light for the physical therapy unit
in the basement of the building. Staff finds that the proposal is consistent with the use of
the property and is therefore reasonable. Criteria met.
b. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not
created by the property owner;
There are unique circumstances to the use of the building that were not created by the
current property owner. First, the building was originally constructed when there was not
a 30 -foot setback requirement along 37th Avenue NE. Secondly, operations at nursing
home facilities have evolved over time. The types of care and treatment that are offered
July 18, 2012
Page 3
59
today, along with the way in which rooms are set-up, were not in place when the building
was constructed. As care and treatment have evolved, so to have state rules and
regulations in terms of operations and how the facility needs to be set-up. Facilities are
required to meet new standards in how they operate, so when one area of a site is
modified, there is the potential to impact other operations, which in turn may require
additional modifications. If the physical therapy unit were to be relocated to another
portion of the basement, it would impact uses already in existence on the site, which
would require additional improvements and modifications to the site. Other uses in the
R-4 Zoning District generally would not have these same constraints. Staff believes that
the property owners did not create all of the circumstances that is requiring the variance
request. Criteria met.
c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
Granting the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The use of
the property would not change if the variance is granted and the look and feel of the
block will not be noticeably altered. The visual impact of the light well on the exterior of
the property is minimal, as the light well will extend no more than three feet into the side
yard setback and is less than three feet high. Criteria met.
d. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties.
The basis of the practical difficulties is due to the Applicant not being able to relocate the
physical therapy unit to another part of the building without impacting other operations
on site. Additionally, the proposed location is the most logical location to provide natural
light into the building at this particular location. There are no other locations that the
light well could be placed to provide light to the physical therapy unit. Economic
considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulty. Criteria met.
3. The variance, if granted, would be consistent with the city's comprehensive land use plan.
If the variance is granted, the use of the property would remain the same. The comprehensive
plan indicates the current land use is institutional (nursing home) and guides this property for
institutional use in the future. Criteria met.
4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning
code.
'file intent of the zoning code is to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the city and
its people through the establishment of minimum regulations governing land development and
use. 'rhe zoning code is established to:
a. Protect the use districts;
The proposal would not change the use of the property. 'rhe current use is consistent
with the zoning code. Criteria met.
b. Promote orderly development and redevelopment;
The proposal seeks to make an improvement to the property which will benefit the
residents of the nursing home. 'rhe Applicant had considered other locations for the light
well; however, those locations could not provide the light to the area where it was needed
without rearranging multiple other operations within the nursing home. Staff finds the
redevelopment of the site to be orderly and logical. Criteria met.
60 July 18, 2012
Page 4
c. Provide adequate light, air, and access to property;
The proposal would not negatively impact adequate light or air from reaching the
property or adjacent properties. The variance is needed to bring natural light into a
portion of the building that currently does not have any. Criteria met.
d. Prevent congestion in the public streets;
The proposal will have no impact on the amount of congestion in the public street.
Criteria met.
e. Prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of structures by regulating land,
buildings, yards, and densities;
The proposed improvement will result in the building exceeding the required 30 -foot
setback by three feet. Allowing the variance will result in the building being located 27
feet from the property line instead of the required 30 feet. Staff does not believe that this
variance will result in overcrowding or concentration of buildings. Criteria met.
f. Provide for compatibility of dlff,rtit land uses;
The proposal will not result in a change of land use, nor will it conflict with adjacent land
uses. Criteria met.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
'rhe Planning Commission unanimously voted in favor of recommending the requested variance subject
to the conditions outlined in the resolution.
POTENTIAL ACTION
1. Approve (with or without conditions) the Variance. In the event of approval (with or without
conditions), the City Council may refer to Exhibit C, and may modify the draft resolution for
approval to include any conditions that it deems necessary.
2. Deny the Variance. In the event the City Council chooses denial of the requested variance, it
should clearly state its reasons for the denial recommendation.
ATTACHMENTS
• Resolution 12-072; Approving a Three —Foot Variance to the Required 30 -Foot Setback from 37°i
Avenue South for the Property at the comer of Foss Road and 37" Avenue NE.
• Exhibit A: Location Map
• Exhibit B: Applicant's Application
• Powerpoint Presentation dated July 24, 2012
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
HENNEPIN/RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 12-072
RESOLUTION APPROVING A THREE-FOOT VARIANCE TO THE
REQUIRED 30 -FOOT SETBACK FROM 37TH AVENUE SOUTH FOR
THE PROPERTY AT THE CORNER OF FOSS ROAD AND 37TH AVENUE NE
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village received a request from the
Applicant St. Anthony Health Center for a variance to the required 30 -foot setback from
37th Avenue NE on June 14, 2012, for the property legally described as follows:
LOTS 8, 9, AND 10, BLOCK 11, MOUNDS VIEW ACRES SECOND ADDITION; THE
NORTH 74.00 FEET OF THE EAST 30.00 FEET OF LOT 11, BLOCK 11, MOUNDS VIEW
ACRES SECOND ADDITION; THE EAST 30.00 FEET OF LOT 13, BLOCK 11, MOUNDS
VIEW ACRES SECOND ADDITION TOGETHER WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS AND REAL CONVENANTS DATED DECEMBER 13,
1985, FILED OF RECORD FEBRUARY 7, 1986, AS DOCUMENT NO. 795498, AMENDED
BY FIRST AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS AND REAL COVENANTS
DATED MAY 13, 1996, FILED OF RECORD MAY 22, 1996, AS DOCUMENT NO. 1121355.
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
TORRENS PROPERTY
TORRENS CERTIFICATE NO. 380735
WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested a three-foot variance to the required 30 -
foot setback from 37th Avenue NE in order to construct a light well along the south
elevation of the building; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the request
based on the related documents shown in the Applicant's application at their regular
meeting on July 17, 2012; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
St. Anthony Village approves the Applicant's variance request based on the following
findings:
1. The requested variance is consistent with all the standards for granting a
variance as described in Section 152.245 of the St. Anthony Village Zoning
Code. More specifically, the City Council finds that the requested variance is
justified for the following reasons:
a. The property owner is proposing to use their property in a reasonable
manner not permitted by the zoning code. The proposed improvement
will allow natural light to enter the basement of the building, thereby
enhancing the Applicant's use of the building and ability to provide better
physical therapy care.
b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the property
owner. The 30 -foot setback was not a requirement at the time the building
62
was constructed. Additionally, relocating the physical therapy unit to
another location in the building would require other operations on site to
be rearranged. Some of this rearrangement would be due in part to
regulations the nursing home is required to follow as part of its licensing.
These conditions were not created solely by persons presently having an
interest in the parcel of land.
c. Granting the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.
The visual impact of the light well on the exterior of the property is
minimal, as the light well will extend no more than three feet into the side
yard setback and is less than three feet high.
d. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical
difficulties. The proposed location is the most logical and best suited to
allow natural light to enter the basement of the building.
e. Granting the variance is consistent with the city's comprehensive land use
plan and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City's
Zoning Code relating to protecting the use districts. The use of the
property will remain the same as it is today.
f. Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Zoning Code relating to promoting orderly development and
redevelopment.
g. Granting the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Zoning Code relating to providing adequate light, air and
access to property. The project will not impact adjacent properties in their
ability to receive adequate light and air, or to access their property. The
variance is needed to bring natural light into the building.
h. Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Zoning Code relating to preventing congestion in public
streets. The project will have no impact on congestion.
Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's Zoning Code to provide for compatibility of different land
uses. The project will have no impact on land use compatibility.
Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent
of the City's 'Zoning Code to prevent overcrowding of land and undue
concentration of structures by regulating land, buildings, yards and
densities. The variance will result in the building being located 27 feet
from the property line instead of the required 30 feet. Staff does not
believe that this variance will result in overcrowding or concentration of
buildings.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council's
approval of the requested variances are contingent on the following:
1. The Applicant shall submit the appropriate plans and permits for review and
approval before beginning construction of the proposed light well.
2. The proposed light well shall at no point be closer than 27 feet from the side
property line adjacent to 37th Avenue NP.
3. The construction of the light well will likely result in the removal of an
existing tree on site (shown in Lxhibit B). The Applicant shall plant a new
tree on site and have it in place prior to the inspection being finalized.
APPROVED in the regular session of the City Council on July 24, 2012.
Attested:
Barb Suciu, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
Mark Casey, City Manager
63
64
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
r &
c
IE &
0
� s C
M",
rw
� � N
r,.. '
i � e
f
w
V
wOw
37TH±±! NE 37TH AVE N E
it
V
jr
Lwu
tool.
!� �Vi1�MR
EDGEMERE AVE X _f
ai�t# lth�ony 3700 Foss Rd N
C�Iilla eC1 Exhibit Saint Anthony Village MN 0 50 100 WSB
Feet AAs
66
Office of the-Itmasey ComltyfPublia Norio Department
n.,rcov n.,, I'll n , v nus r n 107 CORRwuse
nmro m nua n aw F moa, .
rapwr w nn rvn,w.r ro un an. Saint Paul, IS rinesota 557,02'
}llct No, & .62HNT
� Project No, A: gS-619-09
Perce%' xoi�td �" .
St. Anthony Nursing Hone a co -partnership, gran or, of ;Stem' Lowty State'of 1(17nnesota for and
in consideration of Ten Thousand Five Hundred all (510 5--0,90 , hereby conveys„uu'd warrants. to
the County of Ramsey, grantee, for highway prpo'ses, free' end elder of all encumbrances, the
following described real estate in the County of Rams.§—m, ffie"SYeta ,f MifinesoFai
The south 5.5 feet of Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 11, A!QRtds View. Aces, Second
Addition situated in Ramsey County, Minnesota; containing 0.075 acres, more or less.
And the said grantor, for its successors and assigns hereby releuses the County of Ramsey,. its
successors and assigns, from all claims for any and all damages resulting to the lends through and
across which the parcel, of land hereby conveyed is located by reason of the location, grading,
construction, maintenance and use of a public highway over and upon and the removal of materials
from the premises hereby conveyed and from the uses incident thereto, and the County of Ramsey
shall have the right to use and remove all earth and other materials and all trees, shrubs, grasses.
and herbage lying within the parcel of land hereby conveyed.
Dated this /,d, day of
FNTEAED IN TRANSFER MORI)
3 - a3 19"
l0U Mr,KENNA
State of Minnesota,�mS++)
County of ss
The, foregoing Instrument wee ar
lswntt Coan.y wormey
) Lowry Square
Pul, WW 55102
by.
1984.
ST, ANTHONY NURSING HOME -
EY
A partner
BY
A partner
before me. this
of
rtr1-''W8
T,
eel
ka
Q
}
•
11c it 1p
Th
sof
71
7.2
w
W
I
J
Q
I --
d
Q
U
I� 1
O
K
U
No
The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the
zoning code. In that the intent of the code is to "protect the health, safety, and general
welfare of the city and its people through the establishment of minimum regulations
governing land development and use," the granting of this variance will allow the
construction of the proposed addition, which will improve the quality of the physical
therapy program and well-being for both residents and users from nearby facilities,
thereby improving the general welfare of the city as a whole.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Alan Plutowski
2of2
73
74
'x
ARCfHIT lI'6,NA
4125 Lakeland Ave N
Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55422
(763) 533-7171
(763) 533-7979 Fax
June 5, 2012
Saint Anthony Village
Attn: City Manager
3301 Silver Lake Road
Saint Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699
RE: Variance Statement
Dear City Manager:
This statement is in response to the questions required it) applying for and granting a
variance.
Strict enforcement of the zoning code on this property will retain the current footprint
and layout of the existing building. Granting of the variance will allow construction of a
live -foot by twenty -three-foot addition at the lower level in order to reconf gore the
physical therapy unit. An above -grade glazing assembly at the addition creates a source
for natural light, which is lacking in the current existing layout.
The construction of the proposed addition is a permanent structure built of cement
masonry units and steel stud faring with gypsum board interior finish with an above -
grade atrium glazing assembly and prefinislted metal flashing attached to one side off the
existing building. It is a completely reasonable feature for such a facility and it is not
permitted by the zoning code due to the setback along the side of 37"' Street on this site.
The construction of the proposed addition is necessary to improve the quality of the
physical therapy unit space and provides daylighting to the area. The setbacks are
unique to the property and are not created by the property owner and the current 30'
setback was not a requirement when the building was originally designed and
constructed. The current footprint at the physical therapy edge is approximately three
feet inside the setback. The proposed addition will be predominantly below ground and
will extend less than two feet above the ground plane and therefore will not be visually
or physically intrusive to the building f'apadc.
The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. It wilt
improve the character of the area by enhancing the quality of the space it serves and will
utilize natural lighting, thus reducing energy usage.
Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. The owner
is willing to spend this money to enhance the quality of the facility's physical therapy
space and its occupants. Due to the layout of the building and site, this is the best way
to achieve this objective in an effective, efficient manner.
The variance, if granted, would be consistent with the city's comprehensive land use
plan. The land use plan for this site is and will remain multiple -unit residential. Tlic
proposed physical therapy addition will enhance the ability of the facility to continue
current use as a multiunit senior housing serving physical therapy needs.
1 of
75
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
The real property located in Ramsey County, Minnesota, and legally described as:
Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block 11, Mounds View Acres Second Addition; the North 74.00 feet
of the East 30.00 feet of Lot 11, Block 11, Mounds View Acres Second Addition; the
East 30.00 feet of Lot 13, Block 11, Mounds View Acres Second Addition together with
terms and conditions of Declaration of Easements and Real Covenants dated December
18, 1985, filed of record February 7, 1986, as Document No. 795498, amended by First
Amendment to Declaration of Easements and Real Covenants dated May 13, 1996, filed
of record May 22, 1996, as Document No. 1121355.
Ramsey County, Minnesota
Torrens Property
Torrens Certificate No. 3 8073 5
7 6
EXHIBIT' - B:
APPLICANT'S
C . o
tAPPLICA"PION
ec.�o�uy
3301 Silver Lake Road • St. Anthony, MN 55418 • (p) 612.782.3301 • (f) 612.782.3302
www.ci.sainFanthony.mn.its
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Fm:: $60 Residential $100 Other Zoning Districts
A. GENERAL DA"1'A
APPL.ICAN'r'SNAME: Alan Plutows,ki_,.,_.TWP. Arcliite_cts_
The above-named individual, firm, or corporation hereby respectfully submits the following information for the purpose of
securing a variance from existing land use zoning controls as found in the City of St. Anthony's Zoning Code.
Plutowski _ Alan 763 -S33 -71.71x15._____
Contact Person Last Name First Day Phone
It. PROJLCT INFORMATION
1. Subject Property Address: 3_700 Foss_Road
2. Specify the naturo of the project for which a variance is sought: To eonstr'uct a small addition
that &11ows,a_ light into the_lower leve]. �h ical. t-herarw area
3. Explain how you wish to vary from the applicable provisions of the Ordinalice: ,_T.ncr'oachtnent into
setback alon 37t.h St'1'PPt ____
4. Explain in a written statement why the strict enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for
the applicant, preventing the subject property to be used in a reasonable manner; that the plight of the landowner is due to
circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; that the variance if granted, will not alter the essential
the character of the locality; and that economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. Please
address each of these items in your written statement. (City Code §152.245(0))
5. Check all additional supporting documents which are being submitted to help explain this project proposal:
0 Site Plan"' ❑ Topographic MAI) 0 Other(specify)Exterior Elevat9.on _
* Required Can attnc6 additinani pages fn fniht explain proposal nud need f v variance..
I HEREBY cFRT'IFY WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT ALL DATA ON MY APPLICATION FORMS, PLANS AND SPGCCFICATIONS ARETRUE AND
CORRECT TO TILE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
Sigoatuto of Applicant
Dnlc
EXPIRATION
Within one (1) year after the approval of a variance or appeal if the property owner or applicant has not substantially
started the construction of any building, structure, addition or alteration requested as part of the approval, said variance
shall become null and void unless an application for extension of the approval has been submitted. A letter to extend
the approval of a variance shall be submitted to the Assistant: City Manager not les than thirty (30) days before the
expiration of said approval. Such letter shall state the fact tot the request, showing a good faith attempt to utilize the
variance, and it shall state the additional time being requested to begin the proposed construction. The City Council
may grant extensions not to exceed one (1) year. (Rev. July 2011)
F:\2011 website\Variance Amendment Application July 201 Ldoc
St. Anthony Health Center
Setback Variance Request
City Council Meeting
July 24, 2012
ain nthQrry -
i a (%
'."ith`y Heafth Center Setback Variance
• General information
Applicant: Alan Plutowski from TWP Architects on behalf of St. Anthony Health Center
Owner: St. Anthony Nursing Home LP
Location: 3700 Foss Road
Existing Land Use / Zoning: institutional; zoned R-4 multiple dwellings
Surrounding Land Use/ Zoning:
North: high-density residential; zoned R-4 multiple dwellings
South: low-density residential, institutional; zoned R -1A single
family res., R-2 two family res and ROS recreation/open space
East: high-density residential; zoned R-4 multiple dwellings
West: high-density residential; zoned R-4 multiple dwellings
Gain th n lr►SB
i a
7/18/2012 7 7
1
St. Anthony Health Center Setback Variance
6 i e
ai61an"M
WSB
St. AnThony HAT Center Setback Variance
• Setback Variance Overview
— The property owners are proposing to construct a
light well within the required 30 -foot setback from
37th Avenue NE
— The proposed light well extends into the setback
requirement by three feet
aollan,
t�uu t�
C
7/18/2012
►j
St.A ny Health Center Setback Variance
R �' g
SUNT ANYNONY NE4LTH CARE &NTkR
I -sappy ORIP no.o DIN(,'
sroo
'LLLLI LLLILLIL<,<' <L.
R7 �YR�LL.'Fe�.�ll
1. it
aa.Mt ros+ ro bA t< •as N Wt » n. xtua.,
r �
u r" n
ca.cnsa Ewr
n.
. a61,11,110,
St. Anthony;Mat Center Setback Variance
. ain tlz my ..... ...... - .._.._..___ _ _ __...................... _
I a eCJ
7/18/20127 9
3
80
St. Anthony Health Center Setback Variance
Proposed Addition
Location
37th Street
Looking Leet
.sin nth4�
ony Health Center Setback Variance
5 PS
Y J L./ 79- _
r t E+LAROM SITE PLAN AT ORWOSED PT A®DITIDN
RiR ��IQRy
7/18/2012
St. Anthony
Health Center Setback Variance
01 nil
IMI
...
uni III
MEN
•torr KKtA r4 � ••.,#+w
LY . +FAL-i.-w-iN3xs.,+
r
yK
r 1 ! E�lLt�RGEG LEVATION AT PROP0.1' PT ADDITION
NIP
N
St. Anthony HeOM Center Setback Variance
I. ai th
i a C%
7/18/2012 81
5
B 2
St. Anthony Health Center Setback Variance
Side Yard Variance Overview
— The existing basement location of the physical
therapy unit limits the amount of natural light that
can get into the building
— Placing the light well at other locations conflicts
with utility lines and services
— Relocating the physical therapy unit is not
practical, as it would impact other operations of
the center
6ailit- ntlia�ny
i la f45B
c V
ny Health Center Setback Variance
• Variance Criteria Review
— The subject matter of the application is within the
scope of the variance process
— The property owner proposes to use the property
in a reasonable manner. The light well will be used
to provide natural light for the physical therapy
unit
A-1
aunt th a _ _ _. __ . __ �
i a c lam'WSB
7/18/2012
St. Anthony Health Center Setback Variance
• Variance Criteria Review
— Circumstances are unique to the property - not
caused by the property owner. Placing the light well at
other locations conflicts with utility lines and services
to the site. In addition, relocating the physical therapy
unit is not feasible, as it would impact other
operations of the center. The building was also
constructed prior to 30 -foot setback requirement
— If granted, the variance will not alter the essential
character of the locality
A
MRWWF�ealth enter Setback Variance
• Variance Criteria Review
— Economic considerations alone are not the basis
of the practical difficulties
• The basis of the practical difficulties is due to the
Applicant not being able to relocate the physical
therapy unit to another part of the building, as well as
the light well not being able to be located along a
different wall
• The proposed location is the most logical and best
suited to allow natural light to enter the basement
ain Ih�ny A
i a Cl
7/18/2012 8 3
7
St. Anthony Health Center Setback Variance
• Variance Criteria Review
— The variance is consistent with the city's
comprehensive plan
— The variance would protect the land use district.
Present use is institutional and the variance would
not alter that
— The variance allows for orderly redevelopment on
the site
. aint ntl A
Ila eCJ WSB 127-1
FAnthoealth Center Setback Variance
• Variance Criteria Review
— The variance will not reduce the amount of light,
air and access to the property or surrounding
properties. The variance is needed to bring natural
light into the building
— Granting the variance will not increase congestion
in the public streets
aint th .. ... _.. .......- ----- — . A
I a Or S
7/18/2012
�-j
St. Anthony Health Center Setback Variance
• Variance Criteria Review
— Granting the variance will result in the building
being located 27 feet from the property instead of
the required 30 feet. Staff does not believe that
this variance will result in overcrowding or
concentration of buildings
— Granting the variance will not alter the site's
compatibility with different land uses
A
in thQrry - A
i a (J Vsl
ony Health Center Setback Variance
• Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the 3 -foot variance from
the 30 -foot required setback from 37th Avenue Ne
subject to the Conditions outlined in Exhibit C
The planning commission voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the variance at its July 17,
2012 Meeting
A
a
7/18/2012 8
OJ
81 6
St. Anthony Health Center Setback Variance
Questions?
aint IM Ak
i 1, cloy WSB
I All" I I
7/18/2012
10
WSB
&,�,_atx� Engineering ■ Planning ■ Environmental ■ Construction
July 12, 2012
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
c/o Mark Casey
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418-1603
Re: Autumn Woods II Update
Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff:
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763.541-4800
Fax: 763-641-1700
Attached for your information is a revised first floor plan of The Legacy of St. Anthony that was
submitted by the Architect on July 9, 2012. The following items have been changed from the
previous version of the plan:
1) Removed l parlor & added 1 extra care suite unit on first floor,
2) Dropped the building 2 feet (more friendly to neighbors and the entrance of the
building) this kept it more in line with the existing grading, as it won't look as tall
to the neighbors.
3) Changed the roof & land runoff plumbing. Instead of tying into Kenzie it runs
back behind the building and ties into new line on Lowry (they will now run a
pipe through their parking lot to tie into Lowry).
4) Change the dining room- extended for more capacity (doesn't have anything to do
with the setbacks).
5) Enlarged the Kitchen because of the expanded dining room.
Construction of The Legacy of St. Anthony is anticipated to begin in August. Please call me at
763-287-7182 if you have any questions regarding this update.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Todd E. Hubmer, PE
City Engineer
Attachments
Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
K.WI626600VAdmin%D=sV.TR Au umnWo dill Update 071112.dwx
87
7-1.
8 /
Mli oP°
ofl
0 \\
V'l
—
% I
8 /
Mli oP°
ofl
0 \\
V'l
��/A
YMS
&:fss,x Engineering ■ Planning ■ Environmental ■ construction
July 12, 2012
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
c/o Mark Casey
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Dake Road NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418-1603
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-5411-1700
Re: Resolution Approving the Vacation of the Sanitary Sewer Easement (Hennepin County
Document #2524860) located near Kenzie Terrace
Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff:
Attached for your consideration is a resolution that approves vacating the sanitary sewer
easement located on the Autumn Woods It site. We have reviewed the existing easement area
and recommend vacating the easement as the City no longer has sanitary sewer in this location.
This easement previously covered the sanitary sewer that served the former residential properties
located at the Autumn Woods II site. Refer to the attached map for the location of the easement
recommended to be vacated.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc,
/o -w f
Todd E. Hubmer, PE
City Engineer
Attachments
Minneapolis ■ 5t. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
K:%01625400 d.i.V)..1.TR 8 -Serer N-1 1 V..t.n 071112d..
90
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 12-073
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT (Hennepin County Document #2524860) DESCRIBED BELOW
WHEREAS, The City of St. Anthony Village approves vacating the sanitary sewer easement in the
following location:
That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 29, Range 23, described as follows
Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, ST. ANTHONY LANEL ADDITION;
thence on an assumed bearing of North 51 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds East, along a
northwesterly line of said lot, a distance of 178.00 feet to an interior corner of said lot; thence North
38 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds West, along a southwesterly line of said lot and its northwesterly
extension, a distance of 183.00 feet to the center line of "Old St. Anthony and Taylors Falls Road"
as shown on the plat of KENZIE TERRACE, ADDITION; thence South 51 degrees 26 minutes 00
seconds West, along said center line, a distance of 435.46 feet to the most northerly northwest
corner of the plat of KENZIE TERRACE ADDITION: thence on a bearing of East, along the north
line of said KENZIE TERRACE ADDITION, a distance of 215.47 feet to the northeast corner of
Lot 2, Block 1, KENZIE TERRACE ADDITION; thence continue on a bearing of East a distance
of 113.81 feet to a southwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, ST. ANTHONY LANEL ADDITION,
which corner bears South 38 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 22.28 feet from the
point of beginning; thence North 38 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds West, along a southwesterly
line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.28 feet to the point of beginning.
EXCEPTING "THEREFROM that part thereof lying within the right-of-way of Old St. Anthony and
Taylors Falls Road n/k/a Kenzie "terrace (Co. Rd. No. 153)
And
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, ST. ANTHONY LANEL ADDITION, lying westerly of a line
described as follows:
Beginning at the most southerly southwest corner of said lot; thence on an assumed bearing of
North, along a west line of said lot and its northerly extension, a distance of 273.92 feet; thence
North 38 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 19.40 feet to an interior corner of said
RY7ovn,,1 Meering, 2012107242012iHex.San Semve, havemenl I1ncntlon 071112 tori
92
lot, which corner bears North 51 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 178.00 feet from
the most westerly corner of said lot, and there terminating.
WHEREAS, This sanitary sewer easement is no longer needed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village:
1) the City Council agrees to approve the vacation of the sanitary sewer easement and the above
referenced location.
Adopted this 24°i day ofJuly, 2012.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
Mayor
City Manager
r
_ _ _ _ — — _ _ _ _ _ — ON _ — _
ZZ'f0. A1.90.0.00N
q o
G LTJ
of �C
Czw �y_
~ LIJ
m \ F-
LtJ
w � +v
N s8' / LTJ
w ¢ /
C/
N,
8Mp118IHX383M38ZiOZ'ZOI.+f
IN
0
LU
a
z
LU
a �
LU
O
cr: m
V
J 0 z o
0
U�ow
uj
zz=uj
Q <<
Zr a
Lu
J w
W 3:
z w
Q
J }
Q
Z
V)
M
M
w00
E
Z
O
Z
+'
O
-O
z
L
V
W
N
O
a`
v
>< ai
v
`OO�a�im
o
ja__=moo
0
LU
a
z
LU
a �
LU
O
cr: m
V
J 0 z o
0
U�ow
uj
zz=uj
Q <<
Zr a
Lu
J w
W 3:
z w
Q
J }
Q
Z
V)
94
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
95
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Mark Casey, City Manager
Date: July 24, 2012
RE: Quarterly Goals Update
The following information is for the 2012 second quarter goals update. The first page is the
pyramid which outlines the City's Mission, Vision, Strategic Initiatives, Goals and Action
items. The following pages are the Goals Charting document which lists action items that we
are attempting to achieve over the next couple of years. Some action items maybe added or
deleted as the year progresses. A large portion of the action items will be on-going from year
to year.
96
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
MISSION
To be a progressive and livable community, a "walkable"
Village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
o s a c m u atrole-t a ii i F o ...
Strategic Initiatives
Environmental +Quality Technological Quality Housing, Ciencaational Sound, Safe,
Stewardship Infrastructure Proficiency Commercial & Diversity Progressive Community
Industrial Businesses
Build &
Cultivate
Environmental
Responsibility
Contimtc single
hauler discussion
Implement
phosphoms reduction
grant
Re-energivc interest
in Silver & Mirror
Lakes clean-up
Revicw effectiveness
of tiered water rates
on conservation
Plan & encourage
green Iransporlation
ideas (bicycles)
"Build a Rain Barrel"
and "Rainwater
Gardens" Workshop
Become a Step 3
"Green Step City"
Explore green roof on
water storage tank
Discuss wood fires
Explore paperless
office concept
Maintain & i Foster &
Enhance Encourage
Infrastructure Civic
Engagement
Explore joint fiber
partnership
Complete 2012
street, utility and
sidewalk project
Feasibility study of
underground
utilities
Explore accessible
pedestrian signal
(APS) finding
City facilities open
house for residents
2012 flood response
Create funding plan
for sealeoal
program
Mirror Lakc
flooding
Review the sod
replacement and
restoration process
Enhance
web page
Farmer's market in
Village Shopping
Comer
Explore
"McKnight
I luman Services
Award" program
Promote volunteer
opportunities
Explore Cultural -
I Iistorical Center
Consider Saint
Anthony Adopt a
Family
Goals
Create &
Transparent &
Maintain a Safe
increase/Maintain
Maintain
Effective
& Secure
Fiscal Strength
Healthy
Communication
Community
Neighborhoods
Action Stens
Suslainable house
Encourage use of
Integrate new police
I)cvclop a financing plan
remodel project
home health
technology
for facilities and large
services
capital equipment
Create a vision for
Plan and implement
housing
j Enhance use of
technology for all
Continue gram tracking
rehabilitation and
{ social media
city equipment
reinvestment
(twitter etc,)
Study Ilse of fees versus
programs
i
Continue National
properly taxes for
Explore options to
Incident
revenue strategy
Develop a business
provide "SAV"
Management
retention and
signs on
System training for
Support transition of now
expansion program
secondary City
CouncillslalF
Finance Director
accesses
Explore business
Update Hennepin
Evaluate charging Pecs
outreach
Conduct
County's mass
on exempt property
workshop on
dispensing plan
Phase III Silver
sidewalks &
Review fee for service
Lake Village
snowplowing
Crime prevention
charges
awareness
Create a renewal
Turf maintenance
Mtermine percent of tax
housing strategy
workshop
Plait for summer
exempt market valuation
survival school
Advocate on
program
Cooperative ventures
behalf of citizens
with other governments
and city services
and entities
With agencies and
utilities
Plan 2013 levy and street
improvement program
Review compensation,
staffing and
organizational structure
97
9&
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
• ;
�
U
n
�
o
�
n
o
�
m
a
�
c
c
h
0
0
N
c
O
c
�
�
o
U'
U
m
o
_
fh
N
°
N
C
J
N
U
O
N
O
.-
E
c
s
o
Z
U
O m
o
o
'
U
E
a
o
m
m
U
H
°
o
o
at
�
a
o m
U
U
U
z
O
N
U
C
O
O
w
0
';
a
o
a
W U
'�
H
0
C
Uo�
U
o
U
U
U
N
c
o
c
c
O
O
O
m
O
VJ
o
d
o
O
O
a
U
G
y
r4
U F w U Z
_
g
W
_
_
_
u.
_
_
_
C
C
C
U
C
x
'+
C
U
H F
T
S
U
m
C
U
2
2
2
S
K
2
2
U
m
_
a
a
O
�
N
L
Ol
N
�f
U
y
N
p
w
O
a
0
_
iq
m
0
Y
m
y
N
a
a
c
y
c
J
�
o
N
O
_
o'
c
m
m
d
c
m
m
U
m
m
w
o
O
O
U
c
4i
.O
O
=
d
N
U
N
C
O
N
yVlj
U
N
=
@
d
O
N
U
C
c
C9
c
O
°
°
Q
N
y
O
0
ry
N
O_
=
O
N
O
N
N
y
UJ
N
>
Ol
A
t0
6
�=
m
N
n
N
T
n
N
N
6
O
¢
6
"O
OO
OI
L
O
m
=
d
N
c
-p
m
iC
0
Vl
O
N
O)
O
h
c
a
°
o
w
o
N
v
E
d
m
d
o
o.
J
c
m
OOy
O
O
O
n
y
o�
c
m
O
m
N
i0
U
oe
0'
m
m
m
W
W
Cl
",
W
U
li
W
U
U
k
100
�
d
U
m
Z'
y
U
J
a
�o
co
r
=
4
N
O
NN
=
O)
d
C
1/1
N
d
-
a
N
..
N
C
1/1
a=1
y
J
d
a
a
N
d
d
d
2
E
0
U
aco
d
co
°1
m
L
3
�
N
m
L
c7
@
3
m
b0
m
o
.ti0
3
m
x
c
C
C
O
O
N
d
N
N
w
2
b
V
tw
�
tt
m
U
Q
N
N
x
U
U
U
W
W
N
d
U
E
w
m
@
m
O
w
�
=
00
y
v
o
3
Q
d
c
@
rn
@
a
L
3
•,
�
`m
L
C
W
O_I
m
^'o
E
@
LL
J
�°.
N
n
X
W
o
d
0
m
U
d
o
XO
W
@
ll'
O.
o
N
wm
U
U
O.
J
C
J
N
LO
N
@
U
X
d
C
o
C
a
aoi
d
O
U1
d
o
X
W
d
-
w
L
LL
T
N
@
m
U
@
N
o
C
W
Z
@
d
U
m
C
W
Qt
y
Q
N
O
N
o
X
W
W
cU
@
L
U
a
O
U
C
m
E
=
F-
U
a
w
C
c
o
a
Q
x
10 1.
L
N
N
N
C
N
(0
m
E
=
p
c
m
�
o
c
�
3
C
(n
L
O
O
N
O
N
C
L
m
E
o
c
U
S
aNi
y
O
N
L
�
�
3
N
m
a
m
m
w
m
c
cm
3
a
i°\n
m
o
c
ED
c
N
c
U
a
m
U
C7
>
o.
❑
.o
m
0
0
U
0
�
o
y
7`
U
y
�
w
M
�
N
U
�
ti
N
o �
u
o
o
❑ m s Y
U
c
�' ❑ o d
T
at U u
°
am
ii
d
ami
N
rn
m
+
❑ ❑
m
o
C
m
L
>
0
N
V 0
o
'o1 F0 mt
O
cm0
1
O
m
o
E
m
S m
L
� �-
0
N
N
C
U
N
O
>
O
w
N
_
0
N
0
O
@
o) r
y
U
0�2
'O
N
2
n
n
N
N
d
C
N
U
N= N
�
c
m
_
c
c
a
E
c
>
c
am
>
°t
o
o
a
0
0
o
>
m
0
o
m
m
U U
5
a
0
❑
0
a
i❑
0
in
O
w
oc
0
U
a
w
U 2 O
102
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA
July 24, 2012
Immediately following Si. Anthony City Council meeting
Call to Order.
Roll Call.
I. Approval of July 24, 2012, H.R.A. Agenda.
II. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve June 26, 2012, H.R.A. Minutes. (pp. 1-2)
B. Claims. (pp. 3-4)
III. Public Hearings.
None.
IV. General Policy of Business of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
None.
V. Staff Reports.
VI. H.R.A. Commissioner Comments.
VII. Information and Announcements.
VIII. Adjournment.
FACouncil Meetings120121072420121HRA agenda.docx
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1.7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
IIRA REGIJLAR. MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2012
CALL TO ORDER.
Chair Faust called the meeting to order at 7:59 p.m.
ROLL. CALL.
Commissioners present: Chair Faust; Commissioners Gray, Jenson, Stille, and Roth.
Commissioners absent: None.
Also Present: Executive Director Mark Casey.
Guest: Stacie Kvilvang (Ehlers & Associates).
I. APPROVAL OF JUNE 26, 2012, HRA MEETING AGENDA.
Motion by Commissioner Gray, seconded by Commissioner Jenson, to approve the June 26,
2012, Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
I1. CONSENT AGENDA.
Motion by Commissioner Gray, seconded by Commissioner Jenson, to approve the Consent
Agenda, which consisted of:
A. I.I.R.A. Mectinu Minutes of June 12, 2012; and
I3. Claims.
Motion carried unanimously.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
None.
IV. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS Oh' THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
A. Resolution 12-07• Relating to Amendment'rax Increment Note for The Landings
Housing Project within Silver Lake Village. Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates,
presenting.
Ms. Kvilvang explained the proposed revisions to the existing TIF note with Dominium
regarding how unpaid interest is handled and the term of tax increment available. She stated it
typically takes two years for a city to get tax revenue and when TIF notes are issued, it is
anticipated that the first two years of capitalized interest are added to the principal amount of the
Note; if tax increment generated in any one year is not adequate to pay the full principal and
interest, that interest is set aside as not being paid. She indicated the current TIF note states that
unpaid interest had to be added to the principal and the intent of the']']],' note was that interest
I
2
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2012
Page 2
1 would only accrue and be added to principal until the first payment on August 1, 2006. She
2 stated when the TIF note was issued in 2004, the City did not anticipate receiving an inflationary
3 value increase in 2005 and the new end payment date on the TIF note should be reduced by one
4 year to provide Dominium with 25 years of TIF rather than 26. She added the remaining balance
5 at the end of the duration of the TIF district will be approximately $2.9 million.
6
7 Motion by Commissioner Roth, seconded by Commissioner Gray, to approve Resolution 12-07;
8 Relating to Amendment of Tax Increment Note for The Landings Housing Project within Silver
9 Lake Village.
10
11 Motion carried unanimously.
12
13 V. STAFF REPORTS
14
15 None.
16
17 VI. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
18
19 None.
20
21 VII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
22
23 None.
24
25 VI IL ADJOURNMENT
26
27 Chair Faust adjourned the meeting at 8:06 p.m.
28
29 Respectfully submitted,
30 Barbara Hughes
31 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
32
33
34
35 ATTEST: Chair
36
37
38 City Clerk
3
x
z
\u
0000 n
o
OOoO
W'*1
IOWO�
O\N Ol9 UJ
1''L
Nn
T
Ii
H�
HtoUW G
C
w
LL,P as z, �
i
K
o
y
A
a
ommVI
m m
YYsy
rmx
Ul H Vl
W (M
HHM<
b 9 K H
Hy n
h7
to cn
n
n
;s
O n
N
yV H O
(]
n 'V
N
LQ
r
to
�r
N
n
n
ww..
00. o
00 0
0
n
Y Y Y Y
X
mul ,nw
�4
0000
JJJJ
H
\\\\
lTJ
YYNY
ci
NNNN
��
N
,n
o u,
C
ob
N NIO
J12
y
omom
a
0
o0
0
mNmO
o
r
W UIJO
n'<
WONO
H
nC
ur 1-1
r
r
G)
G)
I'm
3
m
O O
ob
mm
0
A
O VI
C
O
�4