HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 07092013CITY OF ST. ANTIMONY VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
Jury 9, 2013
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order.
H.R.A. meeting immediately
following City Council meeting
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the following items:
I. Approval of the July 9, 2013, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested.)
IL Proclamations and Recognitions. (Norte.)
III. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered murine and will be enacted by onemotion. There will be no separate discussion of lbese items unless a Councilrrrenrber or citizen so
requests, in which the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approval of June 25, 2013, Council Meeting Minutes. (pp. 1-8)
B. Licenses and Permits. (pp. 9-10)
C. Claims. (pp. 1114)
D. Resolution 13-050; a Resolution Accepting a Grant on behalf of the St. Anthony Village Fire Department
from the University of Minnesota in die amount of $3,000. (pp. 15-18)
E. Resolution 13-051; a Resolution Accepting Reimbursement funds from the Mississippi Watershed
Management Organization(MWMO) for the Capital Project Agreement in the amount of $13,208.25.
(pp. 19-20)
IV. Public Hearing. (None.)
V. Reports from Commission and Staff. Paul Cincoski, Planning Commissioner is presenting.
A. Resolution 13-052; a Resolution Approving a Variance to Allow an Accessory Structure in the Side Yard
and Closer to the Principal Structure than allowed by the Zoning Ordinance on the Property Located at
2909 Silver Lake Court. (pp. 21-46)
VI. General Business of Council.
A. Metropolitan Council presentation. Adam Duininck, Metropolitan Council Representative District 8 is
presenting.
B. Resolution 13-053: a Resolution Authorizing the City of St. Anthony Village to Submit a Point Source
Implementation Grant Application to the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (PFA) and to Authorize
City Officials to Execute a Grant Agreement on Behalf of the City of St. Anthony Village for the Silver
Lake Storm water Treatment System. Mark Casey, City Manager is presenting. (pp. 47-50)
C. 2013 Goals Update. Mark Casey, City Manager is presenting. (pp. 51-56)
VII. Reports from City Manager and Council members.
VIII. Community Forum.
Individuals may address The City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the
form at the podium; state their name and address for the Ckrk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes Generally, the GO Council unll not take feial action on items
dt rmssed at ibis time, but may typically refer the matter to staf for a fxture report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IX. Information and Announcements.
X. Adjournment.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is sustainable, safe and secure.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CfTY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
JUNE25, 2013
CALL TO ORDER.
Mayor Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
Mayor Faust invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL.
Present: Mayor Faust; Councilmembers Gray, Jenson, Roth and Stille.
Absent: None.
Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey, Director of Public Works Jay Hartman, City Engincer
Todd Hubmer, and Finance Director Shelly Rueckert.
Guests: Commissioner Dan Freeman (Three Rivers Park District) and Peggy Moeller, CPA
(IILB Tautges Redpath. Ltd.).
CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSI13Lh', ACTION ON ALL OF TIIE h'OLLOWING
ITEMS.
1. APPROVAL OF JUNE 25, 2013, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City
Council Meeting Agenda of ,lune 25, 2013.
Motion carried unanimously.
II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
A. Recognition of Service for Nick Voss GreenCorp Member. Jay Hartman Director of
Public Works, presenting.
Mayor Faust requested an update regarding the June 21 storm event.
Director of Public Works Hartman stated there was widespread loss of power throughout the
City including the City's facilities following the June 21" storm. He advised the City has begun
cleanup and curbside pickup throughout the City and curbside pickup will be available through
Monday, July Is`. He encouraged residents to call or visit the City's website for further
information. Ile added the City has a list of licensed contractors for tree removal and/or tree
trimming that is available at City Hall. He commended the Police, Fire, and Public Works
Departments for their quick response and stated the departments worked well together to
mitigate hazards immediately after the storm.
Mayor Faust asked if the streets would be swept again following the curbside pickup.
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
2 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 2013
Page 2
Director of Public Works Hartman replied in the affirmative stating that after the debris is picked
up the City will come through with the street sweeper to clean up residual debris. He asked
residents to keep branches on the back of the curb and stated that any branches will not be on the
grass long enough to kill the grass.
Director of Public Works Hartman advised that Mr. Nick Voss has been with the City for ten
months as a GreenCorps member through the MPCA. He stated that Mr. Voss completed a
number of projects, including increased recycling efforts within the City offices, the School
District, and apartment buildings within the City, a rain garden project at St. Charles Borromeo
School, a pet waste education campaign, and assisting with the ongoing carp removal project at
Silver Lake. He stated that Mr. Voss will be attending the University of Wisconsin Stevens
Point in a graduate program in environmental education and his long-term goal is a career
working for the DNR or MPCA. He expressed appreciation to Mr. Voss for his hard work and
wished him the best in the future.
Councilmember Stille recited the recognition proclamation and Mayor Faust presented a
recognition plaque to Mr. Voss.
Mayor Faust expressed the City Council's thanks and appreciation to Mr. Voss.
III. CONSENTAGENDA.
A. Consider June 11, 2013, Council meeting minutes;
B. Consider licenses and permits; and
C. Consider payment of claims.
Motion by Councilmember Jenson, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve the Consent
Agenda items.
Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING - NONE.
V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF - NONE.
VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL.
A. Three Rivers Park Presentation Dan Freeman Three Rivers Park District 3
Commissioner, presenting.
Mayor Faust introduced Mr. Dan Freeman, Three Rivets Park District Commissioner.
Commissioner Freeman thanked the City Council for the opportunity to speak and stated Three
Rivers Park District enjoys a good working relationship with the City. He stated that Three
Rivers Park District's mission is to promote environmental stewardship through recreation and
education in a natural resources based park system that consists of 22 parks with 27,000 acres.
He explained that Three Rivers Park District consists of park reserves requiring 80% to remain
untouched and 20% to be used for recreation and education. He discussed ongoing project
2
4
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 2013
Page 3
improvements in several of the park reserves and stated Kingswood Park in Minnetrista is a new
park reserve that has the cleanest lake in Hennepin County, adding they hope to develop a water
study area as well as provide key access for bike trails. He discussed the activities available at
the regional parks, noting that many of these parks have nature centers that provide educational
opportunities. He indicated that Three Rivers Park District has 16 regional trails with 125 miles
of trails and stated the regional trails had over 3.5 million visitors in 2011 and they continue to
work to fill gaps in the regional trails as funding and land becomes available and to look for
opportunities to improve trail safety. He advised that Silverwood Park serves as a regional
center for the arts and the environment, devoted to the integration of artistic creation,
appreciation, and natural resources, adding that Silverwood Park ranks in the top ten within the
Three Rivers Park District. He stated the median age range of visitors to Silverwood Park is 45-
59 and 99% of visitors surveyed reported they were satisfied or very satisfied with Silverwood
Park. He stated that Three Rivers Park District has experienced an annual growth rate of 10%
and staff remains cognizant of changing interests, e.g., fat tire biking, and recognizes the need for
innovative partnerships and sustainable financing to make improvements and maintain the park
system. He advised that Three Rivers Park District continues to look for new models and
partnerships reaching underserved areas and ways to reach out to disabled citizens and disabled
veterans to provide better access to the park system. He stated they are open to suggestions and
encouraged residents to contact him with any questions or suggestions.
Mayor Faust stated he recently received compliments from the Mayor of Apple Valley about
Silverwood Park and commended Commissioner Freeman and Mr. Moffatt for their efforts at
Silverwood Park and throughout the park system.
B. Resolution 13-047•_a Resolution Rejecting All Bids for the Silver Lake Storm Water
Treatment Svstem. Todd Hubmer, WSB &Associates presenting
City Engineer Hubmer advised the City recently opened the bids for the Silver Lake storm water
improvement project and the bids came in $430,000 more than the engineer's estimate of
$392,000. I -Ie stated they met with the contractors to discuss the bids and to discuss some
misunderstandings about how the project would be constructed and indicated there were some
assumptions made by suppliers about equipment that were different than what was quoted to
staff and a pre-bid meeting with contractors to describe the project will be held in July. He
added that the contractors agreed that the project can be built for much less cost and less risk and
staff is requesting these bids be rejected and authorizing the project to be rebid.
Councilmember Gray asked if the engineer's opinion regarding project cost has been changed
based on the feedback from the contractors. He also requested further information about the
MPCA grant.
City Engineer Hubmer explained that some technological components can be eliminated from
the project, i.e., some of the mechanical pieces were quoted at $120,000 instead of the earlier
estimate of $20,000 and there was apparently some inexperience or misunderstanding on the part
of the supplier. He added the City only received four bids for the project and staff feels it can get
more bids based on the revised project plans. He stated the City will need to submit another
grant application to the MPCA by the end of July and the project will be considered for
refunding in August. He advised there is no guarantee there will be MPCA money available,
4
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
4 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 2013
Page 4
however, based on conversations with the MPGA, staff believes this project would likely get
funded as a high priority.
Councilmember Gray asked why it took so long to open the bids ager receiving the MPGA grant
in August.
City Engineer Hubmer explained the City was still in negotiations with Rice Creek Watershed
District last fall regarding the plan to develop regional systems for meeting the City's road
reconstruction requirements and to make sure the City received credit for this project.
Councilmember Jenson asked if the City has previously had to rebid a project.
City Engineer Hubmer replied in the affirmative and stated the building in Silver Point Park was
rejected and went out for rebid. He added that the revised Silver bake storm water project plans
will eliminate approximately $100,000 in shoring costs; in addition, there was some
misunderstanding in the bids related to dewatering of the ponds.
Motion by Councilmember Roth, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to approve Resolution 13-
047; a Resolution Rejecting All Bids for the Silver Lake Storm Water Treatment System.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. Resolution 13-048• a Resolution Authorizing the Advertisement and Re -Bid of the Silver
Lake Storm Water Treatment System. Todd IIubmer, WSB & Associates, presenting.
Motion by Councilmember Roth, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 13-
048; a Resolution Authorizing the Advertisement and Re -Bid of the Silver Lake Storm Water
Treatment System.
Motion carried unanimously.
D. Resolution 13-049; Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for the 2014 Street and
Utility Improvement. Todd Ilubmer,WSB & Associates, presenting.
City Engineer Hubmer explained that the proposed 2014 street and utility improvements consist
of Edgemere Avenue from Penrod Lane to Chelmsford Lane, Wendhurst Avenue from Penrod
Lane to Chelmsford Lane, Penrod Lane from 37°i Avenue to Skyeroft Drive, Chelmsford Lane
from 37°i Avenue to Maplewood Drive, 36°' Avenue from Silver Lake Road to Higherest Road,
and Skycroft Drive from Penrod Lane to Maplewood Drive. He advised the project is a three-
year segment of the street reconstruction project based on staff's review of anticipated issues
over the next couple of years related to financing and bond rates. He stated that
recommendations will be presented to the City Council regarding financing and noted that in
order to evaluate those options they need to be included in the feasibility report for the 429
process. He reviewed the project schedule and advised that three public information meetings
would be held and construction would begin in May 2014 with substantial completion in October
2014 and final completion in June 2015.
T
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 2013
Page 5
Mayor Faust noted this is the first time the City has proposed doing a three-year segment and
requested further information about the public information meetings and notification to residents.
City Manager Casey advised that staff needs to rim the numbers as part of its internal feasibility
analysis to make sure the City wants to undertake a project this large.
City Engineer Hubmer advised the City will come back to homeowners once consensus is
reached on the scope of the project and will engage the public once the City Council makes a
decision that this is the correct financial move to make. He added that an additional meeting
with the City Council would be scheduled to discuss whether to proceed with plans and
specifications.
Councilmember Roth requested information about where residents will park their cars during
construction.
City l3ngineer Hubmer advised the project will include construction phasing plans so that no two
adjacent streets are under construction at the same time and the City will make sure residents
have a drivable road surface. He added they would also make sure the phasing plans do not have
contractors hauling in material over newly constructed roads and stated the City can assess
penalties to contractors for damage or wear and tear to newly constructed roads.
Councilmember Stille felt this project could provide opportunities for the City to take advantage
of low interest rates and could also eliminate some fixed costs and setup costs.
City Engineer Hubmer indicated that staff reviewed trends in the bond market and infrastructure
improvement costs and stated staff is seeing more competition in the marketplace and rising
prices due to increases in private development that are competing with these types of projects.
Motion by Councilmember Roth, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Resolution
13-049; a Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for the 2014 Street and Utility
Improvements.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Engineer Hubmer reported that the 2012 street improvement project was completed last
week with the final lift of asphalt. He stated the 2013 water main project has been delayed due
to muddy conditions. He stated that a meeting was held with residents regarding the regional
storm water treatment system at the south end of St. Anthony Village and staff will be taking
comments on what people want for the grass area. He advised the City received a significant
amount of rain in less than 15 minutes during the June 21" storm event and the City saw some
dramatic changes in water flow with one site going from five cubic feet per second to 185 cubic
feet per second in less than eight minutes. He added that staff will continue to work with
residents on any flooding issues.
Councilmember Roth requested information about trees that have died as part of the
reconstruction project.
4
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
6City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 2013
Page 6
City Engineer IIubmer stated there is a two-year warranty on trees and replacement trees will be
planted this fall. He added that information regarding replacement trees was included in a
newsletter to residents.
Mayor Faust requested an update regarding measures taken last summer at Mirror Lake.
City Engineer Hubmer stated that staff has been working with Rice Creek Watershed District and
the City of New Brighton on a petition to Rice Creek Watershed District requesting an
evaluation of flood proofing options and this item will be presented to the City Council in July.
E. 2012 Audit Presentation. Peggy Moeller, HLB Tautges Redpath, presenting,
Ms. Moeller presented the 2012 audit results, including the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report (CAFR), State Legal Compliance Report, Report on Internal Controls, Audit
Management Report, and Communication with 'I'liose Charged with Governance. She pointed
out the financial statements are the responsibility of management and the role of the auditor is to
report on the fair presentation of the financial statements. She stated the City once again
received a clean or unmodified opinion during the 2012 audit. She advised the State Legal
Compliance Report is required by statute and includes testing based on a checklist of seven
categories and no findings were issued this year. She stated the auditors do not audit internal
controls but are considered as a basis for designing the audit procedures and three fundings were
noted in the Report on Internal Controls. She stated the Management Letter shows the General
Fund balance increased $272,500 in 2012 and the total fund balance of $1,975,337 consists of
$68,481 in non -spendable funds and $1,906,856 in unassigned funds. She advised the City has a
minimum fund balance policy of 30-35% and the City's fund balance at December 31, 2012, was
40.75%. She noted the City has four funds with a negative fund balance and these funds are
currently borrowing from other funds, noting the Internal Service Fund holds a long-term
liability that the City likely would not have to pay all at once. She reviewed the Water and
Sewer Enterprise Fund stating that water operations had 2012 net operating income of $88,626
and sewer operations had a loss in 2012 of $130,758. She also reviewed the Liquor Fund stating
that 2012 net income before transfers was $529,273 and the City's operating expenses compare
favorably to similar liquor operations. She indicated the HRA Fund ending balance was
$1,149,187. She advised there were no difficulties encountered in performing the audit and there
were no disagreements with management.
Councilmember Stille requested further information regarding the audit findings.
Ms. Moeller stated the finding regarding delegation of duties is a result of the small number of
City staff and cannot be eliminated. She stated the other findings related to audit adjustments are
typically the most common finding given by auditors because government accounting is so
complex. She stated the third finding was a software issue with the finance department
conversion that has been resolved following City staff's notification to the vendor.
Councilmember Gray expressed concern regarding the software issue and stated this represented
a significant amount of money that was not brought to the City's attention by the vendor.
a
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 2013
Page 7
Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Roth, to accept the 2012 audit
report as presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
F. 2012 Finance Department Annual Report. Shelly Rueckert, Finance Director, presenting,
Finance Director Rueckert presented the 2012 Finance Department annual report and reviewed
the responsibilities of the Finance Department. She stated a significant portion of the City's levy
is made up of the General Fund that increased by $272,500 in 2012; in addition, the City
refunded three bond issues in April 2012 resulting in savings of $631,262 and another bond issue
was refunded in December 2012 resulting in savings of $217,167, adding these savings will
impact future levies and future water and sewer rates. She discussed 2012 Finance Department
activities including software upgrades to a new financial management system and advised the
Finance Department began providing accounting services to MWMO and the City of Birchwood
Village. She stated the City received grants totaling $172,746 in 2012 and since 1999 the City
has received approximately $16 million in grants, which equates to $1,942.88 per resident.
Councilmember Gray applauded Finance Director Rueckert for everything she has accomplished
in a short period of time. IIe stated lie was very impressed with the outstanding changes made in
the Finance Department and thanked Finance Director Rueckert and her stafffor their efforts.
Councilmember Stille stated he appreciated Finance Director Rueckert's efforts to improve the
Finance Department and thanked her and her staff for their hard work.
Councilmember Roth commended the Finance Department staff for their efforts during the
transition and applauded their willingness to take on a new way of doing business.
Mayor Faust expressed the City Council's appreciation to the Finance Department staff for their
efforts.
VII. I2EPOI2TS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
City Manager Casey announced the City was recently awarded the League's City of Excellence
Award. He also thanked the Public Works, Police, and Fire Departments for the great job they
did after last weekend's storm.
Councilmember Jenson reported on his attendance at the League's annual conference held on
June 19-21.
Councilmember Roth reported on his attendance at the League's annual conference. He also
reported on his attendance at the June 24°i concert performed by an orchestra from Finland. He
commended the Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments for working together during last
weekend's storm and stated the City is fortunate to have so many dedicated employees.
Councilmember Stille reported on his attendance at the League's annual conference.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 2013
Page 8
1 Councilmember Gray reported on his attendance at the League's annual conference. He also
2 thanked all the City employees for their efforts during last weekend's storm.
4 Mayor Faust reported on his attendance at the League's annual conference.
6 VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Mayor Faust invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items that
are not on the regular agenda.
Mr. Rob Franks, 3609 Belden Drive NE, appeared before the City Council on behalf of himself
and his neighbors to express concern regarding traffic on their street. He stated that 37°i and
Silver Lake Road is a busy intersection and their street has been besieged with traffic from
people trying to avoid the traffic light at 37°i and Silver Lake Road. He stated he has observed
constant traffic with drivers barely stopping at the stop sign and driving too fast. He stated that
residents filled out a petition with 13 of 16 residents signing the petition complaining about the
traffic. He stated they know they did not buy homes on a cul-de-sac and they teach their kids to
stay out of the street but there is a lot of non-residential traffic on their street that is becoming a
serious issue. He requested that the City Council consider signage, a portable speed limit sign,
or speed bumps, adding they do not think a sign would help because they already have a "no
through traffic" sign.
Mayor Faust advised that City staff will look into the concerns raised by Mr. Franks.
IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
Mayor Faust stated the latest edition of Village Notes was recently published.
Councilmember Roth stated the St. Anthony Orchestra will be holding a concert on Thursday,
July 4"', at Salo Park and further information regarding the concert will be posted on the website.
Mayor Faust stated the City is doing all it can to make sure that residents do not experience
another power outage similar to last weekend and expressed frustration that a significant portion
of the electrical grid went down after the storm. He felt there ought to be some mitigating
factors, adding he was particularly concerned about power outages during the winter months, and
the electrical delivery system needs to be upgraded to make sure it is reliable.
X. ADJOURNMENT.
Mayor Faust adjourned the meeting at 8:43 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara I lughes ('TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.)
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: July 9, 2013 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors License:
Hunerberg Construction, Maple Grove, MN
Heating & Air Conditioning License:
Anderson's Residential Heating & A/C, Spring Lake Park, MN
Centerpoint Energy Minnesota Gas, Coon Rapids, MN
Genz Ryan Plumbing & Heating, Burnsville, MN
Professional Mechanical Services, New Hope, MN
Soderlin Plumbing, Heating & Air, Minneapolis, MN
Rental License:
Applicant: Walter Sentyrz
Location: 2604 27°i Ave
Applicant: Tamela Walhof
Location: 2501 — 2503 33`1 Ave
Applicant: Allen Kluz
Location: 2516 — 2516 37°i Ave
2600 -- 2602 37°i Ave
Applicant: Nativity Lutheran Church
Location: 3329 Belden Dr
3331 Belden Dr
3335 Belden Dr
Applicant: Cassady Properties
Location: 3500 Coolidge St
Applicant: Gary Peterson
Location: 2601 Kenzie Ter #204
Applicant: Yohan Holdings
Location: 4021 Macalaster Dr
Applicant: Griffin Hillbo
Location: 3212 Silver Lake Rd
Applicant: Tom Filzen
Location: 3141 -- 3143 Stinson Blvd
Applicant: Lorraine Weinmeyer
Location: 3323 Stinson Blvd
E
10
This page left intentionally blank
1
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 6/21/2013 - 7/10/2013 Jul 02, 2013 11:11AM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
10176
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
20753
06/21/2013
49,717.00
11798
CENTRAL PENSION FUND LOCAL#49
20754
06/21/2013
2,764.80
11809
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY SUNSHINE FUND
20755
06/21/2013
231.00
10710
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
20756
06/21/2013
1,879.98
11813
NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE
20757
06/21/2013
112.00
11808
SAPID ASSOCIATION
20758
06/21/2013
489.00
11799
THE HARTFORD
20759
06/28/2013
1,080.43
11554
THE HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS
20760
06/28/2013
609.85
10008
AA BATTERY CO
20761
07/10/2013
318.38
10054
ALLIANCE MECHANICAL
20762
07/10/2013
1,081.00
10072
AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS
20763
07/10/2013
78.00
10082
ANDERL, BILL
20764
07/10/2013
200.00
10098
ARAMARK
20765
07/10/2013
81.49
1100
ARTISIAN BEER COMPANY
20766
07/10/2013
6,320.00
10125
ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL
20767
07/10/2013
82.59
10139
B & F FASTENER SUPPLY
20768
07/10/2013
44.47
10159
BEISSWENGER'S
20769
07/10/2013
68.36
1013
BELLBOY CORP.
20770
07/10/2013
15,108.32
1035
BERNICK'S WINE
20771
07/10/2013
2,884.05
11860
BILLS GUN SHOP & RANGE NORTH
20772
07/10/2013
214.25
8544
BOURGET IMPORTS
20773
07/10/2013
179.00
10187
BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
20774
07/10/2013
343.40
10197
BRIAN NELSON INSPECTION SVCS
20775
07/10/2013
472.50
1017
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
20776
07/10/2013
43,141.83
1056
CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE
20777
07/10/2013
172.50
10254
CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO
20778
07/10/2013
15.50
10293
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
20779
07/10/2013
52.80
1021
COCA COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.
20780
07/10/2013
695.29
10332
COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLING. INC
20781
07/10/2013
3,823.99
10338
CONNELLY ELECTRONICS
20782
07/10/2013
409.95
10360
CROWN TROPHY
20783
07/10/2013
101.53
1042
CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE
20784
07/10/2013
1,152.79
11864
CURB DESIGNS
20785
07/10/2013
350.00
11865
D T LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION INC
20786
07/10/2013
255.00
10402
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
20787
07/10/2013
895.65
10417
DISCOUNT STEEL, INC.
20788
07/10/2013
15.86
10432
DORSEY & WHITNEY
20789
07/10/2013
1,338.60
10437
DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES
20790
07/10/2013
20.75
10437
DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES
20791
07/10/2013
20.75
10437
DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES
20792
07/10/2013
20.75
10437
DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES
20793
07/10/2013
20.75
10437
DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES
20794
07/10/2013
20.75
10437
DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES
20795
07/10/2013
20.75
10468
ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC
20796
07/10/2013
221.23
1045
EXTREME BEVERAGE
20797
07/10/2013
298.00
10508
FERGUSON WATERWORKS
20798
07/10/2013
160.01
10526
FLEETPRIDE
20799
07/10/2013
2.04
10550
G & K SERVICES INC
20800
07/10/2013
782.16
1110
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
20801
07/10/2013
134.06
10585
GRAINGER
20802
07/10/2013
23.29
1057
GRAND PERE WINES, INC
20803
07/10/2013
115.00
1032
GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.
20804
07/10/2013
663.74
10612
HAMLINE AUTO BODY
20805
07/10/2013
555.01
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 2
Check Issue Dates: 6/21/2013 - 7/10/2013 Jul 02, 2013 11:11AM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
10636
HEDBACK, ARENDT & CARLSON PLLC
20806
07/10/2013
3,500.00
10661
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
20807
07/10/2013
1,713.30
10673
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY
20808
07/10/2013
1,455.01
1019
HOHENSTEIN'S, INC
20809
07/10/2013
5,356.05
10684
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
20810
07/10/2013
215.87
1027
INDEED BREWING COMPANY
20811
07/10/2013
2,235.00
11754
INTEGRATED LOSS CONTROL, INC.
20812
07/10/2013
579.00
10774
JERSEY MIKE'S SUBS
20813
07/10/2013
117.84
1016
JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING
20814
07/10/2013
58,712.02
1004
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
20815
07/10/2013
50,682.61
10806
L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT
20816
07/10/2013
101.60
10821
LARSON/MICHAEL
20817
07/10/2013
295.31
10845
LIFELINE TRAINING, LTD
20818
07/10/2013
199.00
10857
LMCIT % BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS
20819
07/10/2013
24,640.00
10861
LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
20820
07/10/2013
267.53
1022
M. AMUNDSON LLP
20821
07/10/2013
1,041.16
10893
MARSHALL CONCRETE PROD
20822
07/10/2013
317.16
10904
MCFOA TREASURER
20823
07/10/2013
35.00
10916
MENARDS LUMBER
20824
07/10/2013
28.32
10931
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
20825
07/10/2013
49,037.54
10940
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION
20826
07/10/2013
298.58
11862
MIDWEST FENCE
20827
07/10/2013
2,805.79
10963
MINNEAPOLIS SAW COMPANY INC
20828
07/10/2013
108.49
1051
NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY
20829
07/10/2013
286.50
11149
NORTHSTAR INSPECTION SERVICES
20830
07/10/2013
9,266.95
11163
OFFICE DEPOT
20831
07/10/2013
332.73
11185
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
20832
07/10/2013
285.00
11186
PAEJEC
20833
07/10/2013
144.03
1012
PAUSTIS & SONS
20834
07/10/2013
2,557.44
1001
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
20835
07/10/2013
11,183.20
11240
POSTMASTER (ELECTIONS)
20836
07/10/2013
200.00
11246
PRAXAIR
20837
07/10/2013
35.26
1020
ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY
20838
07/10/2013
85.50
11391
SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS
20839
07/10/2013
668.70
11408
SIGNATURE CONCEPTS, INC.
20840
07/10/2013
322.15
11861
SMITH & WESSON
20841
07/10/2013
175.84
1024
SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MN
20842
07/10/2013
15,336.19
11531
T A SCHIFSKY & SONS
20843
07/10/2013
145.00
11536
TASC
20844
07/10/2013
25.00
11573
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
20845
07/10/2013
134.43
11595
TRI STATE BOBCAT, INC.
20846
07/10/2013
43.68
11609
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
20847
07/10/2013
2,334.51
11857
ULTIMATE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
20848
07/10/2013
10,938.50
11633
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
20849
07/10/2013
38.43
11637
UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
20850
07/10/2013
212.34
11674
VERIZON WIRELESS
20851
07/10/2013
821.18
1037
VINE LINE DISTRIBUTION
20852
07/10/2013
615.00
1025
VINOCOPIA
20853
07/10/2013
878.50
11694
W.D. LARSON COMPANIES LTD, INC
20854
07/10/2013
48.77
11700
WALTER HAMMOND COMPANY
20855
07/10/2013
9.28
1034
WINE COMPANWTHE
20856
07/10/2013
696.47
1023
WINE MERCHANTS INC
20857
07/10/2013
2,778.64
1011
WIRTZ BEVERAGE - (GRIGGS)
20858
07/10/2013
11,079.09
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 3
Check Issue Dates: 6/21/2013 - 7/10/2013 Jul 02, 2013 11:11AM
Vendor Number
Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
1009
WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
20859
07/10/2013
40,968.95
11863
WISE WATERS LLC
20860
07/10/2013
3,360.00
11738
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
20861
07/10/2013
63,415.25
11740
XCEL ENERGY
20862
07/10/2013
12,195.91
Grand Totals: 535,220.80
MAI
This page left intentionally blank
15
Report Date:
Meeting Date:
KE�2L ST EOR 00kNCIL. CONSIDE TION
July 9, 2013
July 9, 2013
Resolution 13-050; a Resolution Accepting a Grant for the St. Anthony Village Fire
Department from the University of Minnesota for the Lucas Device in the amount $3,000.
Resolution 13-051; a Resolution Accepting Reimbursement funds from the Mississippi
Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) for the Capital Project Agreement in the
amount of $13,208.25.
REVIEW:
Before you tonight is a resolution accepting a Grant from the University of Minnesota for the
St. Anthony Village Fire Department to assist in the cost of the Lucas Device
The second resolution is a reimbursement from the Mississippi Watershed Management
Organization (MWMO) for the Capital ;Project Agreement in the amount of $13,208.25.
KI
This page left intentionally blank
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 13-050
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT FOR THE ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE FIRE
DEPARTMENT FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOR THE
LUCAS DEVICE IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village Fire Department applied for a grant from the
University of Minnesota to assist with the costs of the Lucas Device; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village Fire Department was awarded the grant and has
received funds in the amount of $3,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village
accepting a grant for the St. Anthony Village Fire Department from the University of Minnesota for
the Lucas Device in the amount of $3,000.
Adopted this —day of 2013.
ATTEST:
Barbara J. Suciu, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
Mark Casey, City Manager
6:'Countl/feel n.g,2013!07092013 Rewlnfion UgfMheuae devwe,d..x
17
This page left intentionally blank
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 13-051
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REIMBURSEMENT FUNDS FROM THE MISSISSIPPI
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION (MWMO) FOR THE CAPITAL
PROJECT AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,208.25
WFIEREAS, the City of St. Anthony entered into a Capital Project Agreement with the
Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) to implement a storm
water treatment system project within the boundaries of the MWMO; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony has received reimbursement funds in the amount of
$13,208.25 for costs incurred for the Capital Project through May 23, 2013.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village
accepting reimbursement funds from the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization
(MWMO) for the Capital Project Agreement in the amount of $13,208.25.
Adopted this 9d, day of Ly, 2013.
ATTEST:
Barbara J. Suciu, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
Mark Casey, City Manager
R (:o ... wd Al,,Img, 20131070920131 Ras.. hawn A ,epl imds fo, G ani A19d10 20412 01,Aocx
19
20
This page left ire entiorially blank
A
WSB
&Assocrrues, Inc. Infrastructure r Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark Casey, City Manager
From: Kelsey Johnson, AICP, City Planner
Date: June 25, 2013
City Council Regular Meeting for July 9, 2013
WSB Project No. 02170-020
Request: Request for a Variance to Allow an Accessory Structure in the Side Yard
and Closer to the Principal Structure than Allowed by the Zoning
Ordinance on the Property Located at 2901 Silver Lake Court
RECOMMENDATION
The Applicant's request for a variance to allow an accessory structure in the side yard and closer to the
principal structure than allowed by the zoning ordinance is reasonable and consistent with the intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan. Based on review, staff recommends approval of
the requested variances for the property located at 2909 Silver Lake Court subject to the conditions as
outlined in Exhibit C.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Michael Fee
Owner: Same as above
Location: 2909 Silver Lake Court
Existing Land Use / Low Density Residential/zoned: R -IA; Single Family Lakeshore
Zoning:
Surrounding Land North: Silver Lake
Use / Zoning: East: Low Density Residential /Zoned R-lA -Single Family Lakeshore
South: Low Density Residential /Zoned R -1A -Single Family Lakeshore
West: Low Density Residential /Zoned R-lA -Single Family Lakeshore
Deadline for Agency Application Date: 06-02-13
Action: 60 Days: 07-31-13
Letter Sent: N/A
120 Days: 09.29-13
CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE PROPOSED VARIANCE
1. Background
The property owner wishes to construct a seven -foot by seven -foot (49 square feet) shed in the side
yard of the property located at 2909 Silver Lake Court. The shed would be eight and a half feet tall.
The plans show the proposed shed would be located approximately four feet from the foundation of
the house; however, the zoning code requires the measurement be from the eave of the roof. The
roof overhang is another eighteen (18) inches from the foundation of the house. Therefore, the shed
21
22 June 25, 2013
Page 2
measures two and one half (2'/2) feet from the hone and three (3) feet from the side lot line. The
proposed shed meets the required side yard setback.
2. Overview
The Applicant wishes to construct a shed on the property for the purpose of storing lawn and garden
tools. As shown in the plans provided by the Applicant, the shed is proposed to be located on the
southwest side yard of the home. The Zoning Code requires that accessory structures be located
within the rear yard, with the exception of detached garage structures. 'Therefore, a variance is
required to locate the shed in the side yard.
The purpose of the R - IA Single-family Lakeshore District is "to create and maintain lakeshore areas
for single-family detached residences, which due to the natural amenity of the lake and topographic
characteristics, call for zoning regulations which are somewhat different from other single-family
districts and which are designed for the preservation of natural areas". While it would be possible to
locate the shed in the rear yard (lakeside), the Applicant prefers this location as a way to preserve the
view of the property from the lake. In addition, locating the shed in the rear yard would require
grading be done due to the slope of the rear yard. The topography in the side yard is such that no
grading would be required. As shown in the attached photos, the proposed location is well screened
from the street and adjacent property and sits below two retaining walls. Placing the storage shed in
the rear yard to meet the Zoning Code would not provide as ideal of a location in terms of topography
and screening; however additional screening could be provided by the Applicant.
Given that the Applicant wishes to locate the shed in a location other than the rear yard for the
reasons stated above, the proposed location would appear the most logical and reasonable on the
existing site. The 'Zoning Code requires that accessory structures be located at least three feet fi-om the
side lot line. The proposed location for the shed mects this requirement. The Zoning Code also
requires that accessory structures be located five meet from any cave or other portion of a principal
structure. While the plan submitted by the Applicant indicates that the shed is four feet from the
house, this measurement was taken from the base of the house, not the cave of the roof, as required by
the Zoning Code. "rhe Applicant has indicated to staff that the cave of the roof extends an additional
eighteen inches. Therefore, the measurement from the home would be two and a half feet and
therefore a two and a half -foot variance is necessary.
3. Applicable Code.
Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section 152.176 Accessory Buildings (A) requires
that "no accessory building may be located within any yard other than the rear yard, except that
garages may be located in side yards".
Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section 152.176 Accessory Buildings (D) requires
that "Unless attached to and made a part of the principal structure, no cave or other portion of an
accessory building may be closer than 5 feet from any cave or other portion of a principal
structure...".
4. Criteria for and Consistency with Criteria for Variance Approval. Title XV Land Usage, Chapter
152 Zoning Code, Section 152.245, (C) Evidence, lists the criteria the City Council must consider in
determining whether to grant or deny a variance. The applicable criteria include:
1. The subject matter of the application is within the scope of this section.
The application for a variance is necessary considering the proposed shed is located in a yard
where it is not allowed. The proposed shed is also located closer to the principal structure than is
permitted by the Zoning Code. Criteria met.
June 25, 2013
page 3
23
2. Strict enforcement would cause practical dif because:
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted
by the zoning code;
Both requests -'file property owner wishes to construct the shed to store lawn and garden
equipment. Having a shed to store such equipment is a reasonable use. The location
proposed by the Applicant is desired in order to preserve the view of the property from
the Lake, both for the Applicant and adjacent property owners. In addition, locating the
shed in the proposed location prevents the Applicant from having to do any grading in the
rear yard. Given that the R-1 A section of the Zoning Code mentions that regulations
different from other single family districts may be necessary in order to preserve the lake
as a natural amenity, staff finds the request reasonable. If the City Council agrees that the
proposed shed location is reasonable for the reasons stated above, the proposed location
would appear to be the most logical. "Che Applicant has limited space between the home
and the side lot line. In order to meet the required setback from the side property line, the
shed must encroach the required setback from the home. Additionally, the proposed
location provides an increased level of screening from the road and adjacent property
owners. Criteria met.
b. The plight gJ'the property owner is dire to circimistances iniique to the property not
created by the property owner;
Side yard -The regulations pertaining to accessory structures in the Zoning Code apply
to all zoning districts. However, the Zoning Code recognizes the uniqueness of the R -I A
District in that different requirements from other single-family districts may be called for
to preserve the lakeshore. While the Code does not make specific mention of accessory
structures being permitted in side yards in the R -IA district, it is staffs belief that the
intent of the 'Zoning Code is to preserve the lake (and views of the lake) where it is
reasonable. The property owner is attempting to prevent potential negative impacts to the
lake by avoiding grading and site lines. The property owner is not responsible for the
existing topography of the rear yard. Criteria met.
Setback- If the City Council agrees that locating the shed in the side yard makes the
most sense in order to preserve the site lines and grading closer to the lakeshore, the
proposed location appears to be the most logical given that it is well screened from the
street and adjacent property. The Applicant has limited space on the southwest side of
the home and in order to meet the side yard setback, the shed must encroach into the
required setback from the principal structure by two and one half feet. Staff believes that
meeting the side yard setback is a priority over the setback from the principal structure
given that locating the shed closer to the side property line could impact the adjacent
property. In addition, the measurement from the principal structure is from the eave of
the roof. The shed is actually four feet from the side of the home. Criteria met.
c. The variance, ifgranted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
Both requests -The proposed shed will not alter the essential character of the locality.
The proposed shed is only seven feet by seven feet and is positioned at a lower grade and
surrounded by vegetation so that it is well screened from the street and adjacent property.
Storage sheds similar to the one proposed by the Applicant are common among other
single-family homes throughout the City. Staff finds that the essential character of the
locality will not be changed. Criteria met.
d. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties.
Side yard- The reason the Applicant is proposing the shed in the side yard is to preserve
the site lines and grading adjacent to the lake to the extent possible. Not only will
2 4 June 25, 2013
Page 4
locating the shed in the side yard preserve the view of the property from the lake, but the
proposed location prevents the Applicant from having to do any grading in the rear yard.
Criteria met.
Setback -- If the shed is to be located somewhere other than the rear yard, the proposed
location appears to be the most logical. The variance is necessary because the Applicant
has limited space on that side of the home and needs to meet the side yard setback.
Criteria met.
3. The variance, ifgranted, would be consistent with the city's comprehensive land use plan.
If the variance is granted the use of the property would remain the same land use as it is today.
The comprehensive plan guides this area for single family use and adding the shed will not alter
that use. Criteria met.
4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning
code.
The intent of the zoning code is to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the city and
its people through the establishment of minimum regulations governing land development and
use. The zoning code is established to:
a. Protect the use districts;
The proposal would not change the use of the property or create a disruption to the
Single-family Lakeshore District. The current use as a single-family home is consistent
with the City Code. The R-1 A section mentions that the district is unique in that different
requirements from other single-family districts may be necessary in order to preserve the
lake as a natural amenity. The proposal to locate the shed in the side yard would appear to
be consistent with that intent. Criteria met.
b. Promote orderly developrnent and redevelopment;
The proposal seeks to make an improvement to the property by having a place to store
tools and lawn equipment which could otherwise not be screened/stored which staff finds
to be orderly. Criteria met.
c. Provide adequate light, air, and access to property;
The proposal would not negatively impact adequate light or air from reaching the
property or adjacent properties. The proposed shed will be eight and a half feet tall and at
a lower grade than the closest adjacent property. Although the shed will be within the
required setback from the principal structure, it should not prevent adequate light or air
from reaching the property due to its small size (49 square feet). Criteria met.
d. Prevent congestion in the public streets;
The proposal will have no impact on the amount of congestion in the public street.
Criteria met.
e. Prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of structures by regulating land,
buildings, yards, and densities;
Allowing the requested variance will not result in overcrowding of the land or an undue
concentration of structures. The shed would not put the property over the maximum
amount of impervious surface allowed by the City Code. In addition, a detached shed is a
permitted accessory use and is common within the City. Criteria met.
f. Provide for compatibility of different land uses;
The proposal will not result in a change of land use, nor will it conflict with adjacent land
uses. Criteria met.
June 25, 2013
Page 5
CONCLUSIONS
While alternatives do exist for locating a storage shed on the property in such a way that wouldn't require
the need for a variance, staff feels the Applicant's request for variances is "reasonable" and that the
variances will not adversely affect the surrounding property and site lines of the Lakeshore on Applicant's
property and surrounding properties.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Request Additional Information and Continue the Public Hearing. The Applicant appears to
have provided enough information for the City Council to make a decision to approve or deny the
request. Should the City Council request additional information from the Applicant, the City
Council should continue the meeting until a later time or send this item back to the Planning
Commission for further discussion.
2. Approval (with or without conditions) of the Variance. In the event of a decision to approve
(with or without conditions), the City Council may refer to Exhibit C and may modify the draft
resolution for approval to include any conditions that it deems necessary.
3. Denial of the Variance. In the event the City Council chooses denial of the requested variance,
it should clearly state its reasons for the denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution to be
brought back at a later time.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A: Location map
Exhibit B: Application and Supporting Material
Exhibit C: Resolution 13-052• a Resolution Approving a Variance to allow an Accessory
Structure in the side yard and Closer to the Principal Structure than allowed by the
Zoning Ordinance on the Property located at 2909 Silver Lake Court.
25
27
airy iftI1011
C X11 &
3301. Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony Village, Minnesota 55418
Office: (612) 782-3301
Fax: (612) 782-3302
www.d.slint-anthonry.1run.us
Address of Property Involved:
Property ID Numb
Legal Description:
-For Office Use Only -
Planning rile Number
Project Number
Application Submittal Date
Application Completed Date
Fee Paid
Receipt Number
Planning Commission
Meeting Date
Council Decision
Council Decision Date
Applicant Information
Applicant Name:
Applicant Adores
Applicant Telephone Number:�_ � ` - 76 5 Other:
Applicant Fax Number
Applicant [mail Address: N1! T C c tytq, cow\
- ....-- -- ._.-._._ .. .�-. ---------- ------ -- ---
Property Information
Property Owner (if different from
Owner Address:
Owner'relephone Number: --------
Owner
___.Owner Email Address:
Type of Request (Check All that Apply)
Appeal ($100 fee)
E] Comprehensive Plan Amendment ($750 fee +$1,500
escrow if residential; $3,500 escrow if
commercial/industrial)
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ($200 feel $450 escrow if
residential; $850 escrow if commercial/industrial)
Easement Vacation ($200 fee + $500 escrow)
Preliminary Plat ($S00 fee + $500 escrow)
Final Plat ($500 fee + $500 escrow)
Minor Subdivision/Lot Split ($250 fee +$1,250
escrow)
Planned Unit Development (PUD) ($750 fee
$2,500 escrow)
Dezoning(5500fee -F$750escrow)
E]2oning Text Amendment ($500 fee + $750 escrow)
1-1 Site Plan ($250 fee -+ $450 escrow)
Variance ($200 fee +- $450 escrow if residential;
$850 escrow if commercial/industrial)
OurMission is to he a progressive and livable a naell(ahle vdlerge, which is.snsfainahle, .sgft, and wcum
28
Description of the Request (OR a separate detailed narrative explaining the project):
Filing and Information Requirements
The City requests that you make a pre -application meeting with the City Planner to discuss the application process,
requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Planning Commission, a certified survey of the
property is required for all applications. A checklist with additional requirements can be found at www,gi_saint-
anthonumn_us.
lncomi 1eYe Application and Submission Deadline
A complete land use application (including all required fees and escrows) must he received at least 30 days prior to the
meeting of the Planning Commission or City Council meeting at which the request will be heard. Submission of an
incomplete application may delay the processing of your land use request. The application approval time commences
and an application is considered officially filed when the City Planner has received and examined the application and
determined that the application is complete. A decision on whether the application is complete or incomplete shall be
made within fifteen (7.5) working days following the submittal of the application. When the application is deemed to be
"complete" it shall be. placed on the agenda of the first possible Planning Commission meeting provided that all required
public notices have been sent and published. Upon submission of a complete application, state statute requires that a
decision be issued within 60 days regarding each request; however, a 60 -day extension may be obtained if more time is
needed.
Notice of Meeting Attendance
in order for the planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated
representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available
agenda.
Agenda Deadline and Meeting Schedule
Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the fourth Monday of every month at 7:00 p.m., while City Council
meetings are held typically the first and third Tuesday of every month at 7:00 p,m. Meeting dates and times are subject
to change so please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. All meetings are held at the St. Anthony
Community Center in the Council Chambers, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418, unless otherwise
stated. Applications are advised that additional meetings and/or workshops are scheduled when necessary.
Acknowledgement and Sipnature
I acknowledge that I have read all of the information listed in the City of St. Anthony Village Land Use Application and
fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. If
additional fees are required to cover costs incurred from processing of the application, the City has the right to require
additional payment from one or more of the undersigned, who shall be jointly liable for such fees. Such expenses may
include (but are not limited to) direct city payroll and overhead costs, fees paid to consultants and other professionals,
and the cost of printing, mailing, and supplies. Applicants are advised that an escrow deposit is required at the time of
the submittal of the land use application to offset costs associated with the proposed project. Unused portions of an
escrow are retui nod to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. I understand that approval
from other agencies may be required before commencement with the stated project.
Property Owner Signature (Required) Date
Applicant Signature (If different than the property owner) Date
Please contact the City Planner at 763-287-8521 or
planner@ci,ssint-anthony.mrl.us if you have any questions regarding this application.
May 2013
29
30
v
7J
n
A
c9 ^�
Ra
�a
7
`c
V
(b
U1
f7'
c
CO
9
Ra
Proposed Shed at 2909 Silver Lake Court
31
SIZE*:
Door opening: 60" W x 76" H
Cu ft: 322
Sq ft: 45
EXTERNAL DIMENSIONS*:
Exterior: 7' W x 7' D x 8'6"
INTERNAL DIMENSIONS*:
Interior: 6' 8-102" W x 6'8-1/2" D x 8' 3-314"
COLOR:
Sand wlchocolate accents
ALI
m
lit
34
2909 Silver Lake Court
Variance Requests
City Council Meeting
July 9, 2013
'4a1
th ny - �tS
e
e O
Z
O
-i ive r La ke Co u rt
-(G' er;llnformation
Applicant / Owner:
Michael Fee
Location:
2909 Silver Lake Court
Existing Land Use
Low-density residential / Zoned R -IA- Single-family Lakeshore
/ Zoning:
Surrounding Land Use
/ Zoning:
North: Silver Lake
East: Low-density residential / Zoned R -1A- SF Lakeshore
South: Law -density residential / Zoned R -1A- SF Lakeshore
West: Low-density residential / Zoned R -1A- SF Lakeshore
ItnthQny
7/1/2013
1
7/1/201]
2909 -Silver Lake Court
(:5aint nil ny r
CiaeL'/ w�6'
36
2909 Silver Lake Court
• Overview
— The property owner is proposing to construct a
7 x 7 x 8.5 foot shed in the side yard
-- The Code requires accessory structures to be
located in rear yards
— The property owner wishes to locate the shed in
the side yard to avoid grading on the lake side of
the property and to preserve the view from the
lake
wsa
-- - Silver Lake Court
• Overview
— The shed would be located within 2.5 feet from
the eave of the home
— The Code requires accessory structures be at least
5 feet from the principal structure
-- Variances are needed to locate the shed in the
side yard and within the required setback from
the principal structure
A
t a C1 cvse
7/1/2013
3
2909 Silver Lake Court
V, a (ehr
7'. 7
<
2909 A rVer Lake Court
Ain, la thr
N
7/1/201337
4
29091 Silver- Court
All V, in6
a, f„
" ain th
11i i - ., Court
cr
zr.L
I y
Riaf 1 G.;
t
r
d
7/1/2013
5
2909 Silver Lake Court
CY.
!!1! AAAA
. aia khQrry
i a CJ
2909 Silver Lake Court
Am
Variance Criteria Review
— The subject matter of the application is within the
scope of the variance process
— The property owners propose to use the property
in a reasonable manner. The shed will be used to
store lawn and garden equipment
i a t1
7/1/201339
[-
M
2909 Silver Lake Court
IvW,
• Variance Criteria Review
— The R -1A District is intended to preserve the lake
as a natural amenity. Locating the shed in the side
yard will allow the property owner to avoid
grading on the lakeside and preserve views from
the lake.
— The property owner has limited space on the SW
side of the home and cannot meet the side yard
setback without encroaching into the required
setback from the principal structure
,tin fh�ny _
Wl-ake Court
•
MVaHiance WCHiteria Review
— The variance will not alter the character of the locality.
The shed will be well screened and will have minimal
impacts to adjacent property
— Economic considerations are not the basis of the
practical difficulties. The owner wishes to avoid
grading on the lakeside and to preserve views from
the lake
— The variance is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The property is guided for single
family use. This will not change
amba"87
AL
WSS
7/1/2013
FA
7/1/201341
MWi09 Silver Lake Court
Variance Criteria Review
— The variance is in harmony with the intent of the
Zoning Code
• The use as a single family home will remain
• The proposal seeks to improve the property
• The proposal will not negatively impact adequate light or air from
reaching the property or adjacent property
• The proposal will have no impact on congestion in the public street
• The proposal will not result in overcrowding of the land
• The proposal will not conflict with adjacent land uses
11anZ13
h�nyA
t % WSB
29 ever Lake Court
• Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow an
accessory structure in the side yard subject to the
findings and conditions outlined in Exhibit C.
ain th�ny A
42
owl Ver Lake Court
Questions?
airs th
f T
7/l/2013
EXHIBIT - C: 43
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 13-052
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE IN THE SIDE YARD AND CLOSER TO THE PRINCIPAL.
STRUCTURE THAN ALLOWED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2909 SILVER LAKE COURT
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village received a request from the Applicant
Michael Fee for a variance to allow a storage shed in the side yard and closer to the
principal structure than allowed by the Zoning Ordinance on the property located at 2909
Silver Lake Court on June 2, 2013, legally described as follows:
Lot 5, Block 4, HARSTAD SECOND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the request based
on the related documents shown in the Applicant's application in a public hearing at their
regular meeting on June 24, 2013; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St.
Anthony Village approves the Applicant's variance request based on the following findings:
The requested variance is consistent with all the standards for granting a variance as
described in Section 152.245 of the St. Anthony Village Zoning Code. More
specifically, the City Council finds that the requested variance is justified for the
following reasons:
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. The
shed will be used to store lawn and garden equipment.
b. The rear yard is the only place the Code allows for the shed; however, the R -IA
Zoning District is intended to preserve the lake as a natural amenity. The
property owner wishes to locate the shed in the side yard in order to avoid
grading in the rear yard and to preserve the views of the property and adjacent
properties to and from the lake. The proposed location does not require any
grading. Furthermore, it is not the property owner's fault that grading would be
required to locate the shed in the rear yard.
c. If the shed is to be located someplace other than the rear yard, the proposed
location is the most logical due to screening and existing topography. The
property owner has limited space on the southwest side of the home and in order
for the shed to meet the side yard setback, an encroachment into the required
setback from the principal structure is necessary. The property owner cannot
change how much room there is between the home and the side property line.
Granting the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The
shed is positioned at a lower grade and surrounded by vegetation so that it is well
screened from the street and adjacent property. Storage sheds are common
among other properties in single family districts. The use of the property will
remain a single family home in a single family neighborhood. The essential
character of the locality will not be changed with the addition of the storage
shed.
e. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties.
f Granting the variance is consistent with the City's comprehensive land use
plan and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City's
Code relating to protecting the use districts. The use of the property will
remain the same as it is today.
g. Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the
City's Code relating to promoting orderly development and redevelopment.
Allowing the shed at the proposed location on the property is consistent with
promoting orderly redevelopment. In addition, it is the intent of the R -IA Zoning
District to preserve the lake as a natural amenity. By locating the shed in the side
yard as opposed to the rear yard, the shed will be tucked away out of sight lines
to and from the lake, thus preserving the views of the lake as a natural amenity.
h. Granting the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of
the City's Code relating to providing adequate light, air and access to
property.
i. Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of
the City's Code relating to preventing congestion in public streets. The
project will have no impact on congestion.
Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of
the City's Code to provide for compatibility of different land uses. The
project will have no impact on land use compatibility.
k. Allowing the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the
City's Code to prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of
structures by regulating land, buildings, yards and densities. A detached shed is
a permitted accessory use and is common among other properties in the City.
The proposed shed would not put the property over the maximum amount of
impervious surface. The variance will not result in overcrowding or
concentration of buildings.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council's
approval of the requested variance is contingent on the following:
1. The Applicant shall submit the appropriate plans and permits for review and
approval before beginning construction of the proposed shed.
2. The proposed shed shall at no point be closer than 3 feet from the side property line
or 2.5 feet from the home.
3. The exterior of the shed shall be done in a manner that is consistent with home and
garage with regard to color and building materials.
APPROVED in the regular session of the City Council on July 9, 2012.
Attested:
Barb Suciu, City Clerk
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
Mark Casey, City Manager
45
This page left interilionally blank
ta
T`3 f -
LT,
TV fl ',"_,lJ,'
kw
try,
A"i
ZiT'll I
T JT ":;ALI.f 12
VC
3 R
lo"
inf
Y JJN-
, �
Y, o; flVL
9 V nl
tv v
'qj q
jW", --17:
7-1
r�,,•,, _L�'f
vai
190 Adi'Ll.,
;I�, OC, -
_41* IF;
%I:af.i:, 1.�f
15
111 -.1"JI la. -1 p IT 1�.
JI, . v r......
It,
WT
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
WSB
ANIUM
e Aeau,NSI t,3��. Engineering • Planning a Environmental a Construction
iwes
July 1, 2013
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
c/o Mark Casey
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418-1603
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Re: Resolution Authorizing the City of St. Anthony Village to submit a Point Source
Implementation Grant Application.
Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff:
Attached for your consideration is a resolution authorizing the submittal of the Point Source
Implementation grant application to the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (PFA) and to
authorize City officials to execute the grant agreement on behalf of the City of St. Anthony
Village for the Silver Lake Stormwater Treatment System.
Submittal requirements and timeframes for processing this grant application:
• Ad for bids — July 3, 2013 and Judy 10, 2013
• Pre-bid meeting — July 15, 2013
• Open bids — July 31, 2013
• Submit grant application —July 31, 2013
• Award bids — October 29, 2013
• Submit as -bid costs to the PFA and MPCA --No later than June 30, 2014
At any point in the process the City will be able withdraw the grant application if they determine
that it is not in the best interest of the City. It is anticipated this this project will enable the City
to achieve 90% of the Silver Lake phosphorus reduction goal as established by the Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and will be eligible for up to 15,400 credits from the RCWD to
be applied towards street reconstruction projects.
We have discussed this project with the PFA and MPCA and they have determined that this
project is eligible to receive TMDL grant funds.
Minneapolis • St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
CAUmsV3nib So<niUPPDmaU. nMNitr0S0AWin0ov4Wngwnry InRni11F&II(owolG.11wkOMMI17OVI MDL Guaw RCSOWiIon(,,,ISIItt d.
48 City of St. Anthony Village
7/1/13
Page 2
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Todd E. I-lubmer, PE
City Engineer
Attachments
CpU rsV1aiL.Slain\APPIAmV.aalIM... O, III\NHJ-Vl'emlpltlp' Imm...m files\ConsntOwloak\l1116511%01TMDL (imnt Resolteion (brct IcllaAm
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 13-053
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE TO SUBMIT A
POINT SOURCE IMPLEMEMENTATION GRANT APPLICATION
TO THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC FACILITES AUTHORITY (PFA) AND TO AUTHORIZE CITY
OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE A GRANT AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ST.
ANTHONY VILLAGE FOR THE SILVER LAKE STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the Point Source Implementation Program, established in Minnesota Statutes 446A.073,
as amended provides funds for construction projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village is hereby applying to the Minnesota Public Facility
Authority for funds to be used for eligible costs for the Silver Lake Stormwater
Treatment System, and
WHEREAS, grant monies will provide up to 50% of eligible improvements,
WHEREAS, to remain eligible for these funds, as -bid costs must be submitted to the PFA and
MPCA and,
WHEREAS, these costs must receive MPCA certification no later than June 30, 2014.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village that:
1) The City of St. Anthony Village has the legal authority to apply for the grant, and the financial,
technical, and managerial capacity to ensure proper construction, operation and maintenance
of the project for its design life.
2) Upon approval of its application by the PFA, the City of St. Anthony Village may enter into an
agreement with the PFA for the above referenced project, and that the City of St. Anthony
Village certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in all
contract agreements described in the Compliance listing of the grant application.
3) The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute such agreements, and
amendments thereto, are as necessary to implement the above project on behalf of the City of
St. Anthony Village.
Adopted this 9th day of may, 2013.
ATTEST:
Barbara J. Suciu, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
Mark Casey, City Manager
49
50
`This page left intentionally blank
51
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Mark Casey, City Manager
Date: July 9, 2013
RE: 2013 Goals Update
The following information is provided to the Mayor and Council for the first 2013 goals
update. Attached is the pyramid which outlines the City's Mission, Vision, Strategic
Initiatives, Goals and Action items followed by the Goals Charting document. This document
lists action items the City is attempting to achieve over the next couple of years. Some action
items maybe added or deleted as the year progresses. A large portion of the action items will
be on-going from year to year.
1
52
Continue single -
hauler discussion
Implement
phosphorus
reduction grant
Explore Silver
Lake & Mirror
Lake clean-up
Review effect
of tiered
water rates on
conservation
Hold a rain barrel
and rainwater
gardens
workshop
Become a "Green
Step 4 City"
Explore green
roof on water
storage tank
Monitor wood
fires impact
Explore less
paper office
concept
Explore alternate
energy ideas
Mission
. C ain thon
ilia e
To be a progressive
and livable community,
a "walkabie" Village which is
sustainable, safe and secure.
..........................................
VISION
"SaintAnthony is a vibrant community that values our unique
environment, our fiscal soundness and a tradition of being a desirable
city in which to five, work, learn and play."
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
Explore joint
Enhance web
Explore
Develop social'
Develop
Develop financial
fiber partnership
page
Sustainable house
media policy and
Technology Plan
plan for facilities
Complete 2013
Maintain farmer's
remodel project
enhance usage
Plan and
and capital assets
street, utility and
market in SA
Implement
Install new
implement new
Continue grant
sidewalk project
Village Shopping
housing
"SAV" signs on
technology for all
tracking
Perform
Center
rehabilitation
secondary City
city equipment
Explore
feasibility study
Explore Cultural-
and reinvestment
accesses
Update Hennepin
cooperative
of underground
Historical Center
programs
Create
County mass
ventures with
utilities
Hold former
Phase III Silver
Communication
dispensing plan
other governments
Explore
elected officials
LakeVillage
Plan — Branding
Continue
and entities
accessible
open house
Develop business
and use of logo
National Incident
Plan 2014 levy
pedestrian signal
Create "Virtual"
outreach ideas
Create new
Management
and street
(APS) funding
City Hall — 24
Conduct Council
resident
Systems training
improvement
Hold city facilities
hour access from
Tour of City
Welcome Packet
for Council/staff
program
open house for
website
Ensure city
Create
Expand summer
Review
residents
Explore
code reflects
Community
survival school
compensation,
Pursue Min
Mirror
alternative polling
sustainability
Profile (rep lace
Continue crime
staffing and =,-
Lake area
place (Ramsey
initiatives
CAFR)
prevention
organizational
flooding options
Co)
Explore a
Review/update all
strategies
structure
Explore LEU
Conduct a
Redevelopment
forms and place
Identify trafficPrepare
a financial
Lighting
citizen's academy
Study
on web
studies on major
plan exploring
Explore "Storm
Proofing"
Conduct a
citizen's survey
Explore Dog Park
Explore use of
credit cards —
roadways and
intersections
alternative
revenues
(electrical
Create
utility billing
Enhance
Perform human
outages) )
Technology
"Village"
pedestrian &
resource risk
in
bike -friendly
assessment
Business Park
routes including
Analyzelvalidate
Create
sidewalks
contracts
Resources for
start-up business
(entrepreneurial)
3-12-2013
53
a
a
T
p
d
C
O
m
C
U
-Y
`o
y
3
E
�
@
N
a
L
3
o
N
c
ry
a
0
p
.y
�
m
C
NTO
41
m
N
O
N
@
m
N
O
N
T
Fa
>
u
c
>
>H
�WzUW�u
O�
Y
raa
O
l
t
z
4
t3
,,
C
t
t
t
t
t
.
iE
0?UC7q
a
o
Z
=
a
U
o
N
O
ry
«
C
y
O
w
Y
N
U
d
m
a
N
o
m
0
p
C
c
N
N
QI
@
m
m
(p
v
'g0
3
N
6
@
c
m
o
N
N
�
C
m
0
p'
C
"_--
Op
@
�
`0
n
0
o.
o
o.
i
o
U
E
x
w
m
w
o
x
v
m
x
x
w
O
0
x
w
x
w
x
w
o
o
w
a
x
w
o
x
J
a
x
w
x
w
54
51,
=
\
E
\
)
\
\
\C)
\
\
\
)
7-5
&
\
\
/
`
\
y
0
\
\
\
E
\
\
\
\
\
55
U
�
O
O
N
C
(n
O
N
E
O
C
@
C
T
N
U
N
6 CC
N
d
m
O
O
m
O
N
N
C
U
O
m
`o
w
�'
.E
m
n
w x
c
N
O
G
C
C
U
m
m
75
W
N
N
C
O
L
O
'O
m
O
m
CO
LN.• p
Ol
N
C
Uo
O
U
U
4.
LL
O
O
�L
C
W
O
M
Q
O
N m
Yd
W
gyp`
O
Off:
N
a
iY
N
VI
a
y.�
O O
N
7�'.
aj
k
•a
�
L c
UU
z
�-
0 0
V
@
I r
�
x
c
CO
N
K 'E N
N
O
N
@
L O N
m
O
9
@
I m
pi
]
N
O
@
E2
m
C
N
N
n
15
m
ry
u
d
@
N
n
O
m
N
@
'N
YO
O
0
-C8>
�
`S
o
m
rn
m
E
O: 2
�
E
m
0
w
m
o
oI-
�
o
°'
w
'o U m
N
E
o
B
«
N
d
A
N
_
a)
@
@
N
O
m
C
"O
C
C
C
L
C
C
j
6C
ry
YU
N
d
d
d
0
�O'
@
6
O
6
O
al
C
a)
O
6
%
(6
i p
5
U
U
U
x
X
w
S
a
D
U
X
w
U
w
-: p
0
w
a
56
This page left intentionally blard<
2014
Swearing in of Newly Elected Officials
FUTURE COUNCIL
7/9/2013
Planning Commission Items from December
Meeting
Meeting
Staff
Date
Type
Items/Issues
Present
Special
City Council
July 22
4:30 pm
'four of the City
City Manager
City Manager
6:30 par
Worksession
Dept Beads
Department Heads
Night to Unite Proclamation - Consent
City Council
July 23
Regular
Presentation by St. Anthony Police Department
City Manager
City Manager
Ordinance Amendment regarding fences
Sgt. Jon Mangseth
City Engineer
Planning Commission Items from August
City Council
August 13
Regular
St. Anthony Liqun Operations Mid -Year Report
City Manager
Accepting bids from Silver Lake Stormwater Treatment System
Mike Larson, LOM
City Engineer
2014 Budget Presentation
City Council
School District Presentation
City Manager
August 27
Regular
Resolution for Chamber Fall Event
Finance Director
Accept Feasibility Report/Order Plans & Specifications for 2014 Street
Wendy Webster, SANB Schools
Project
City Engineer
City Council
September 10
Regular
Preliminary approval of the 2014 Levy
City Manager
Finance Director
September 24
Regular
Kiwanis Peanut Day Proclamation
City Council
Approval of Election Judges for the 2013 Municipal General Election
City Manager
October 8
Regular
Planning Commission Items from September
City Council
2013 Goals Update
City Manager
October 22
Regular
City Council
City Manager
November'12Regular
Planning Commission Items from October
City Council
Canvass of Municipal General Election Results
City Manager
Approval of the 2014 Pee Schedule
City Council
November 26
Regular
Approval Plans & Specifications & Order Advertisement for Bids For the
City Manager
upcoming Street Project
City Engineer
Fire Prevention Poster Contest Winners
Fire Chief
Planning Commission Items from November
Adopt 2014 City Council Meetings Calendar
December 10
Regular
Appoint Parks & Planning Commission Members
City Council
City Manager
Approval 20'14 Final Levy
Finance Director
Accepting Donations & Grants
Adopt 2014 City Meeting Calendar
2014
Swearing in of Newly Elected Officials
January 14
Regular
Planning Commission Items from December
City Council
Housekeeping Resolutions
City Manager
Planning Commission Workplan
City Council
January 16 &'17
Regular
Goal Setting Retreat
City Manager
Department Heads
2014 Street Project
City Council
January 28
Regular
Resolution Calling for Hearing on Improvements
City Manager
Resolution for Hearing on Assessments
City Engineer
Calling for Preparation of Assessments
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
July 9, 2013
Call to Order.
Roll Call.
I. Approval of July 9, 2013, H.R.A. Agenda.
IL Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve June 11, 2013, H.R.A. Minutes. (pp. 1-2)
B. Claims. (pp. 3-4)
III. Public Hearings.
IV. General Policy of Business of the H.R.A.
V. Staff Reports.
VI. H.R.A. Commissioner Comments.
VII. Information and Announcements.
New Businesses:
• Golden State — 2526 Highway 88 #9 (internet automotive sales)
VIII. Adjournment.
FACouncil Meetings12013107092013\HRA agenda.docx
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
ROUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
JUNE 11, 2013
CALL. TO ORDER.
Chair Faust called the meeting to order at 7:39 p.m.
ROLL CALL.
Commissioners present: Chair Faust; Commissioners Gray, Jenson, Roth, and Stille.
Commissioners absent: None.
Also present: Executive Director Mark Casey.
L APPROVAL OF JUNE 11, 2013, H.R.A. AGENDA.
Motion by Commissioner Gray, seconded by Commissioner Jenson, to approve the June 11,
2013, Rousing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
II. CONSENT AGENDA.
Motion by Commissioner Jenson, seconded by Commissioner Gray, to approve the Consent
Agenda, which consisted of:
A. R.R.A. Meeting Minutes of May 14, 2013; and
B. Claims.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
None.
IV. GI!;NERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
None.
V. STAFF REPORTS.
None.
VI. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
None.
Motion carried unanimously.
1
2
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2013
Page 2
VII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
Executive Director Casey announced that "NEI) Services," 3805 Stinson Boulevard, recently
opened and provides computer repair services. He also announced that "Hindia Wireless, LLC,"
3805 Stinson Boulevard, recently opened a retail store for wireless and wireless accessories.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT.
9 Chair Faust adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m.
10
1 I Respectfully submitted,
12 Barbara IIughes
13 TimeSaver Off :Site Secretarial, Inc.
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER
Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 7/2/2013.
— -------------------- ----- --
7/2/2013
-- -------- -------
Jul 02, 2013 01:59PM
Vendor Number
Payee
Check Number
Check Issue Date
Amount
10180
BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION
20863
07/02/2013
750.00
10432
DORSEY & WHITNEY
20864
07/02/2013
2,733.50
10461
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC
20865
07/02/2013
300,00
11715
WELLS FARGO BANK MACN9303-121
20866
07/02/2013
400.00
11738
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
20867
07/02/2013
232.00
Grand Totals: 4,415.50
This page left intentionally blank