CCMin_66Jun8 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 1 1 REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 8, 1966 The meeting was called to order at 7s00 P.M. with the following presents Mayor Nilsen, Clerk Strandquist, Councilmen Warkentien, Black and Stone. Also present were Engineer Lemberg, Attorney Galvin and Treasurer Olsen. 2~ 7b Minutess Stone moved, seconded by Strandquist that minutes of the regular meeting of May 25, 19b6 be approved. Motion carried. Hearing of June Upon request of Attorney Jerome W. Beardsley, attorney for 22nd Continued - the petitioners for the vacation of walkway between Pascal Vacation of and Holton at Ruggles, the council agreed to continue said Walkways hearing from June 22nd to July bth. Beardsley stated he will be out of town on the earlier date. Correspondence: Letter from Carl Bucher, Ramsey County Weed Inspector, Weeds to be cut advised that weeds must be eut'by July 1, 1966. by July 1, 1966: Copy of letter of Jun® 7, written to St. Paul Water St. Paul Water Department signed by Engineer Lemberg, stated that offsets Department - found necessary during construction of Storm Sewer Pro3eet N.E,Area Storm 66-1, are authorized and cost of same should be billed to Sewer Project: the Village of Falcon Heights. Capitol City ~ Letter dated May 27 from Vincent Schadegg, insurance agent, Mutual Aid Agree- addressed to Attorney Galvin was reviewed. Saone was in ment -Insurance answer to inquiry regarding insurance premiums and the Premiums Capitol City Mutual Aid Association Agreement. HEA~TNGs Improvement on At 8:00 P.M., Mayor Nilsen opened the Public Hearing for the Albert Street Proposed Albert-Larpenteur Improvement. Clerk Strandquist North of Larpenteur read the official notice of hearing. There were approx- Avenue: imately twenty people present. Engineer Lemberg gave report as to what is to be accomplished on this proposed project. R. D. 1Rhaley That water has been hitting me for a long time. Ts this all 170l~ Alberts they are going to do? We .had good drainage before the sewer was put in. I was assured then that they would go back to the elevation of the street, but instead, they raised it about eight inches. I have taken the entrance to mgr drive- way and diked it. If you put this in, in this way, how do you intend to drain it? I am definitely against this. Harry Bruncke My driveway is about at the point where the sewer clean out 1710 Alberts was, and when the sewer was put in, the cover for that manhole was put down about six inches from where the original grade was and then they raised the road six inches and my driveway was about the same as Mr. Whaley's. The water gets into the driveway and there is no way for it to get out. We had very good drainage until they built Larpenteur. That upset the apple cart. The catch basin doesn't do the fob it should. A11 these factors have contributed to this water problem. About the sixty fast - it looks to us that it should go back 160 feet. Lembergs The reason for sixty feet - that is far enough from the intersection so we can reshape the gutters to carry the water into these lower places.