My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.02.18 CC Minutes - NE Metro Water Summit
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2016 CC Minutes
>
2016.02.18 CC Minutes - NE Metro Water Summit
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2016 4:14:01 PM
Creation date
3/8/2016 4:14:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
2/18/2016
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for the NE Water Summit on February 18,2015 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Update <br /> DNR Assistant Commissioner Barb Naramore talked about the White Bear Lake settlement <br /> agreement, stating it was compatible with updates to the Water Supply Plan. They are receiving <br /> comments and implementing ideas. The DNR is working with communities individually on <br /> Comprehensive Plan updates. They are on target to set the protective Lake elevation by <br /> November 2016. Barb explained this is not a guarantee lake level, but negative threshold reports <br /> will alert the DNR to examine it and address concerns. The Ground Water Management plan <br /> was finalized in 2015 and she talked about SF 1910 and explained where things were left off <br /> stating she didn't expect any changes. Naramore provided information on the augmentation <br /> study saying cost estimates to augment from the Saint Paul Regional Water Services chain of <br /> lakes would cost between $55M and $67M with operational costs of$500-$660k annually. <br /> Phosphorus levels and other contaminants were of concern, and advanced treatments would <br /> increase the cost by$23-$40 million, with maintenance going to $900,00044M. The study <br /> made no assumption on who would construct or operate the system. <br /> Columbus Council Bill Krebs said it was unfair to expect taxpayers pay for augmentation of <br /> White Bear Lake. <br /> MN House Rep Peter Fischer stated that the models they are looking at right now show that the <br /> lake will eventually dry up. The White Bear Lake Conservation District would be responsible <br /> for operating the system. He said he felt the state should be responsible if it is shown that ground <br /> water pumping is part of the problem. <br /> RCWD Commissioner John Waller mentioned diverting JD #1 Ramsey County into White Bear <br /> Lake because 1/2 of the water currently flowing through it would provide the 2 billion gallons <br /> estimated for augmenting the lake. <br /> Naramore replied to Krebs comment saying that the DNR is doing what legislation has directed <br /> them to do. Senator Roger Chamberlain added that it is a legislative issue now. Representative <br /> Matt Dean stated that augmentation of White Bear Lake is not new, and he thought the cost <br /> estimates were high. Another study is being done by the residents on White Bear Lake <br /> Metropolitan Council Update <br /> Met Council Environmental Services Leisa Thompson talked about the Met Council's vision to <br /> keep more water in the region by reusing it, and she highlighted some water reuse projects <br /> related to wastewater effluent stating that 250 million gallons a day gets reclaimed. The Water <br /> Resources Plan highlights creating a reclamation plant for groundwater recharge in lieu of <br /> enlarging sewer pipes, and this would be needed by approximately the year 2030. It is being <br /> suggested reclaimed water could be used to augment White Bear Lake, except phosphorus and <br /> chlorides would be an issue, along with water temperature. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.