Laserfiche WebLink
D6 Water Storage <br />Most cities maintain their own storage space and several have plans to increase storage capacity <br />before 2030. The opportunity to share storage facilities is another efficiency that can be provided by a <br />joint water system. Existing storage is shown in Table D6.1. <br />The Cities of Lexington and Columbus are not shown in Table D6.1 as they do not currently have any <br />storage. Lexington does not maintain storage, most likely due to its shared water supply with the City of <br />Blaine. Columbus has plans to add 150,000 gallons of underground storage in the near future and uses <br />a small hydropneumatic tank to maintain water pressure. <br />Table D6.1 Summary of existing storage facilities by city <br />City <br />Tank Number <br />Total Capacity <br />Type of Storage <br />Elevation <br />(Ma) <br />Centerville <br />1 <br />05 <br />Elevated <br />1054 5 ft <br />Circle Pines <br />1 <br />05 <br />Elevated <br />Not provided <br />Hugo <br />1 <br />15 <br />Elevated <br />Not provided <br />Hugo <br />2 <br />05 <br />Elevated <br />Not provided <br />Lino Lakes <br />1 <br />10 <br />Elevated <br />1054 5 ft <br />Lino Lakes <br />2 <br />1.0 <br />Elevated <br />1054 5 ft <br />Total <br />5.0 <br />Joint Water Utility Feasibility Study D-6 <br />