My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.04.18 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2016 CC Packets
>
2016.04.18 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2016 4:37:53 PM
Creation date
4/14/2016 4:33:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
4/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.0 Water Supply and Demand <br />The major components of the various water systems were analyzed to determine existing performance <br />and future needs, both as a joint utility and individually. Water supply and demand was the first quantity <br />examined. Historical data showing water pumped in previous years provides a useful tool for predicting <br />future water demand. The last five years of well pumping data for each city was reviewed in order to <br />establish general trends and per capita use. Water demand projections are based on average historical <br />water use patterns from 2009 to 2013, along with expected population growth for the region. Most of <br />the data is from city documents such as comprehensive plans, DNR Water Conservation Plans and <br />DNR annual reports. Missing data was estimated on a case by case basis. <br />5.1 Well Supply Requirements <br />Well supply or production is a measure of the water system's ability to supply water needed to sustain <br />demand. Per "Ten State Standards" a water system should be designed with sufficient firm capacity to <br />supply the peak day demand of the system. Firm capacity is the amount of water that would be <br />available if the highest capacity well was out of service (in case of maintenance or emergency). Peak <br />day demand is the day of highest demand over the course of a year. It is usually calculated as a <br />multiple of the average day demand based on historic trends. This is a key factor in understanding the <br />potential benefit of a Joint Utility. In a Joint Utility fewer wells are needed to meet firm pumping <br />capacity. As independent cities each would require one extra well to meet firm pumping capacity. In a <br />Joint Utility those same six communities would only need one extra well to meet firm pumping capacity. <br />5.2 Unaccounted-for Water Use <br />Water systems lose water through leaks in watermains, flushing, or other un -metered activities such as <br />firefighting, street cleaning, construction, unauthorized water use and improper meter calibration. The <br />amount of water pumped will always be greater than the amount of water sold. The Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which regulates groundwater appropriations, recommends <br />that the amount of unaccounted water should be less than 10% of the total water pumped in order to <br />minimize lost water. For this study each city's unaccounted for water use was assumed to remain <br />constant and meet historical averages through the future study period. <br />Figure 5.1 shows unaccounted for water as a percent of total water pumped from the most recent five <br />years of data available for each of the six cities. As a joint utility, the amount of water unaccounted for is <br />less than 10%, meeting the DNR benchmark. However, some cities have unaccounted water greater <br />than or close to 10%. It would be beneficial for these cities to begin taking steps to reduce the amount <br />of unaccounted water regardless of whether a joint utility is created or not. <br />Joint Water Utility Feasibility Study 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.