My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.04.18 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2016 CC Packets
>
2016.04.18 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2016 4:37:53 PM
Creation date
4/14/2016 4:33:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
4/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Interconnections will be used to convey water from the existing sources and storage facilities in <br />developed communities to those communities that are growing and need more water supply. The <br />development of a detailed hydraulic model to plan strategically placed interconnections is <br />recommended as a next step. In general, the cost of interconnecting the communities is considered to <br />be at no additional cost to implement in the long run. All interconnections would be recommended in <br />locations where existing watermains would have been placed anyway. The sizes would be increased in <br />some cases but the benefits of interconnecting the systems would actually reduce other watermain <br />sizes within each of the growing communities. In most cases watermain was already planned to be <br />installed in the areas shown in Figure A6. However, some of the planned watermain would be installed <br />as new trunk main interconnecting the communities. <br />For areas where dead-end watermain exists, additional watermain is recommended to be installed to <br />loop the piping for improved circulation and water quality. A benefit of a joint utility is that dead end lines <br />could be more easily looped with pipes in neighboring communities rather than looped back to another <br />main in the same community. In some cases joining the pipes would be a few feet of additional <br />watermain as opposed to hundreds needed to loop back to another main within the same community. <br />A key factor in analyzing a joint utility will be planning the future watermains so that there is no net <br />increase in cost over the cities developing independently. If planned properly and early, there should be <br />opportunity to actually reduce costs over independent development. Cost reductions could be realized <br />through the elimination of dead end watermain by interconnections at city boundaries (rather than <br />looping watermain within each city), as well as eliminating the need to provide perimeter trunk main <br />(medium to large diameter watermain around the perimeter of a city) for each individual city. <br />Interconnections would eliminate the need for each community to carry large diameter trunks along <br />their municipal border parallel to similar large diameter main in the adjacent community. In other words, <br />perimeter trunk main could be provided for the joint utility as a whole, thus reducing redundancies <br />created by individual adjacent systems. <br />Joint Water Utility Feasibility Study 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.