My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.04.18 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2016 CC Packets
>
2016.04.18 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2016 4:37:53 PM
Creation date
4/14/2016 4:33:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
4/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9.9.2 Repair and Replacement Costs <br />Repair and replacement costs, shown in Table 9.3, are divided based on ownership. Maintenance costs <br />are likely to be lower for a joint utility compared to individual development since less infrastructure will <br />need to be maintained and administrative costs can be combined. <br />Table 9.3 Summary of annual repair and replacement costs for Options 1, 2, and 3 <br />9.9.3 Anticipated Water Costs <br />Anticipated water costs are shown in Table 9.4. The average cost of 1,000 gallons (kgal) of water sold <br />in the six -city region in 2010 was $2.07. The cost of water is expected to increase in both Individual <br />Development and Joint Development scenarios as more infrastructure is needed to accommodate <br />growth and maintenance costs. However, the increase in costs is less for joint development as less <br />infrastructure is required per person served. <br />Table 9.4 Average cost of water per 1000 gallons sold <br />Cost per <br />thousand gallons <br />2010 (average) $207 <br />2030 Joint Development $277 <br />2030 Individual Development $295 <br />9.2 Analysis of Options 1, 2 and 3 <br />9.2.9 Comparison of Capital Costs <br />Capital Costs for Option 1 —jointly owned supply, storage and treatment system <br />The cost estimates for Option 1 were developed using population projections and historical water use <br />data. Using this data, the trigger charts in Figures A5 and A7 were created. The trigger charts were <br />used to estimate when additional wells and storage would be needed. Future watermain was adapted <br />from cities' comprehensive plans and additional watermain was added to connect all of the cities and <br />provide looping to improve circulation where it was needed. The joint system would need specific <br />locations of trunk watermain installed to facilitate interconnections and combine the separate <br />distribution systems. This cost is estimated to be the same or less than individual 2030 trunk <br />watermain costs, but the future watermain would be in slightly different locations or slightly larger in <br />Joint Water Utility Feasibility Study 30 <br />Option Z <br />Option 2 <br />Option 3 <br />Centerville <br />$300.000 <br />$0 <br />$500.000 <br />Circle Pines <br />$300,000 <br />$0 <br />$500,000 <br />Columbus <br />$200,000 <br />$0 <br />$300,000 <br />Hugo <br />$1.600000 <br />$0 <br />$2,200;000 <br />Lexington <br />$200000 <br />$0 <br />$200.000 <br />Lino Lakes <br />$1,700,000 <br />$0 <br />$2.100;000 <br />Joint Utility <br />$1.400,000 <br />$5:700,000 <br />$0 <br />Total <br />$5,700,000 <br />$5,700,000 <br />$5,800,000 <br />9.9.3 Anticipated Water Costs <br />Anticipated water costs are shown in Table 9.4. The average cost of 1,000 gallons (kgal) of water sold <br />in the six -city region in 2010 was $2.07. The cost of water is expected to increase in both Individual <br />Development and Joint Development scenarios as more infrastructure is needed to accommodate <br />growth and maintenance costs. However, the increase in costs is less for joint development as less <br />infrastructure is required per person served. <br />Table 9.4 Average cost of water per 1000 gallons sold <br />Cost per <br />thousand gallons <br />2010 (average) $207 <br />2030 Joint Development $277 <br />2030 Individual Development $295 <br />9.2 Analysis of Options 1, 2 and 3 <br />9.2.9 Comparison of Capital Costs <br />Capital Costs for Option 1 —jointly owned supply, storage and treatment system <br />The cost estimates for Option 1 were developed using population projections and historical water use <br />data. Using this data, the trigger charts in Figures A5 and A7 were created. The trigger charts were <br />used to estimate when additional wells and storage would be needed. Future watermain was adapted <br />from cities' comprehensive plans and additional watermain was added to connect all of the cities and <br />provide looping to improve circulation where it was needed. The joint system would need specific <br />locations of trunk watermain installed to facilitate interconnections and combine the separate <br />distribution systems. This cost is estimated to be the same or less than individual 2030 trunk <br />watermain costs, but the future watermain would be in slightly different locations or slightly larger in <br />Joint Water Utility Feasibility Study 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.