Laserfiche WebLink
Table 131.2 Total well capacities for individual cities and a joint system <br />City <br />Total Well Capacity <br />Total Well Capacity <br />Firm Well <br />firm Well <br />U)M) <br />(rngd] <br />C91PB it (gpmj <br />Gdpacii yr (mgd) <br />Centerville <br />1 660 <br />24 <br />560 <br />08 <br />Circle Pines <br />2.200 <br />32 <br />1,000 <br />14 <br />Columbus <br />2 400 <br />35 <br />1 400 <br />20 <br />Hugo <br />5.426 <br />78 <br />4.225 <br />61 <br />Lexington <br />945 <br />14 <br />0 <br />0 <br />Lino Lakes <br />5.450 <br />79 <br />3.650 <br />5533 <br />Total <br />18.080 <br />260 <br />16.280 <br />234 <br />D2 Water System Demands <br />Current average day and peak day water use for each city, and the combined cities, are summarized <br />below in Figure D2.1 and Table D2.1. The City of Columbus has only four residential connections, so its <br />gallons per capita water use Is not a comparable metric for that municipality. Additionally, the peaking <br />factor for the City of Lexington is unusually high which can most likely be attributed to incomplete <br />historical data. <br />14,000,000 <br />12,000,000 <br />peak day <br />a average day <br />10,000,000 <br />'q 8,000,000 <br />CO <br />0 <br />0 <br />CL <br />H <br />0 6,000,000 <br />m <br />0 <br />2,000,000 <br />0 �- <br />i <br />kL <br />Centerville Crile Pines Columbus Hugo Ladngton Lino Lakes Joint System <br />Figure D2.1 Five year average, average day and peak day water use <br />Joint Water Utility Feasibility Study D-2 <br />