Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 3, 2014 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />Jim Veiman, 16585 Ingersoll Avenue North, said the road drops off into steep ditches and is <br />eroding away; maintenance should be considered instead of the overlay. <br />John Lutz, property owner at corner, said there is water every year across Ingersoll, and an overlay <br />will not last more than five years. The road was too low in that spot. <br />There were no other comments, and Mayor Weidt closed the public hearing. <br />Council Member Klein said the corner was the worst section of the road, but it would be a huge <br />cost to fix the subsurface. He also felt there was no point in widening the road to accommodate a <br />trail since there would be one on CSAH 4. He said he wanted to see the road made safer but felt <br />that if a majority of the property owners are not happy with it, the City should move on to another <br />project, but he noted that it would cost more to fix 165th in the future. <br />Council Member Bronk asked what it would take to correct the subsurface. Kennedy stated that <br />the cost would be substantially more and assessments would go up. The road is not heavily <br />traveled, and what was being proposed was a reasonable cost alternative to extend the life of the <br />pavement. Bronk talked about the realignment of the intersection and the elimination of two <br />gravel road segments for one. He said he understands the safety factor but thinks the money spent <br />to widen the road may be setting a precedent of the next project. <br />Council Member Haas talked about the Assessment Policy and how it had been changed to a cost <br />per unit instead of a linear foot charge. He also noted that the policy does not consider road <br />widening for the addition of a trail, and the City should not consider it without a policy to address <br />it. He said he was surprised at the number of people opposing the project. Haas acknowledged <br />the subsurface problem, and he questioned whether this project is the best use of money. <br />Council member Petryk agreed that the widening was not appropriate at this time. She asked what <br />it would cost to continue to seal coat and patch it. Jay did not have exact cost, but he said he felt <br />the benefit would be limited considering the condition of the road. <br />Mayor Weidt stated that the City does not want to force a project if the neighborhood does not <br />want it, though he felt it would be a good project to be done. He pointed out that the road will <br />continue to decay. The cost to fix it in the future would be higher, but if the neighborhood didn't <br />want it, the money should be put into another project. <br />Council Member Petryk said she was unclear on how many landowners wanted to do this project, <br />and she didn't want to move forward with it if the vast majority were opposed. Kennedy noted <br />that there were approximately 67 affected property owners. <br />Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to table to allow time to hold another informal <br />neighborhood meeting and bring the issue back to the Council at the March meeting. <br />Ayes: Klein, Bronk, Haas, Petryk, Weidt <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried. <br />Council took a short break. Mayor Weidt called the meeting back to order at 8:45 p.m. <br />