2007.11.05 RESO 2007-0056 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RESOLUTION 2007-56 APPROVING AN INTERIM USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A HOME OCCUPATION AS AN ACCESSORY USE, PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7180177TH STREET NORTH WHEREAS, Joseph Modrow has requested approval of an interim use permit to allow for the operation of a home occupation as an accessory use on the property legally described as follows: SECTION 4 T31N R21W PT NE1/4-NE1/4 SEC04T31R21 BEING THE E 330FT OF W 660FT OF SD 1/4 OF SEC 4 HUGO WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Joseph Modrow for a interim use permit to allow for the operation of a home occupation as an accessory use with the following findings, subject to the conditions included therein: 1. The applicant owns the property and resides in the principle residential address associated with the home occupation. 2. The home occupation is allowed as an accessory use in the Future Urban Service zoning district. 3. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow a way for a property owner to have a home occupation with an interim use permit with conditions to limit the operation of the business. The home occupation shall meet the general performance standards and procedures by which home occupations can be conducted without jeopardizing the health, safety and general welfare of the surrounding properties. Staff feels that the home occupation meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 4. The present character of the surrounding area is large lot residential. The applicant is requesting approval to allow more business related vehicles on the property that may alter the character of the area, but are adequately screened from the adjacent properties. The applicant does drive the large vehicles down the street, however the number of trips are minimal. 5. The interim use permit shall be reviewed in two years. 6. It does not appear that the home occupation would impose additional unreasonable cost to the public.