My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005.12.19 RESO 2005-0072
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2005 CC Resolutions
>
2005.12.19 RESO 2005-0072
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 2:04:21 PM
Creation date
1/13/2015 3:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
12/19/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 2005-72 <br />APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT DENYING THE REZONING <br />APPLICATION FROM RS, RESIDENTIAL SERVICE TO C-1, CENTRAL <br />BUSINESS FOR TERRY MONTPETIT FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT <br />LOCATED AT 13891 FOREST BOULEVARD NORTH <br />WHEREAS, Terry Montpetit, has requested approval of a Rezoning application to allow <br />for the development of a bar and restaurant at13891 Forest Boulevard North, and; <br />WHEREAS, Terry Montpetit has applied separately for a Liquor License 2 a.m. closing <br />and said applications are incomplete. <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for a Rezoning at a <br />duly called Public Hearing and recommends denial. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the rezoning, <br />based on the findings contained in the staff report dated December 5, 2005, including the <br />following: <br />I. The requested amendment is not in compliance with the City's <br />Comprehensive plan. Specifically because the plan envisions three types of <br />commercial development as reflected in the zoning regulations; a downtown <br />commercial area, a regional commercial format, and a neighborhood <br />commercial format. This property, being outside the downtown, being only <br />three acres in size, being directly adjacent to residential, and near the entrance <br />to several residential neighborhoods is suited best for a neighborhood <br />commercial format. <br />2. The requested amendment does not comply with the intent of the C-1 District, <br />which is intended to "provide for the establishment of a downtown which is a <br />blend of cultural, recreational, civic, entertainment, retail, sales, and office <br />uses." The property is not located within the downtown area but is adjacent to <br />residential uses on its east and south boundaries and is separated from the <br />downtown by additional property that is zoned in the Residential Service <br />District and by 14& Street. <br />3. The requested zoning would constitute an isolated spot of C-1 zoning that is <br />not contiguous to any other C-1 zoned property. Zoning and planning goals <br />would be better served by having C-1 zoned areas located nearer to <br />commercial or industrial uses and not directly adjacent to residential uses. <br />4. The uses allowed by the C-1 District, including taverns and restaurants -the use <br />contemplated here, will have unreasonable negative impacts on adjacent <br />properties. This is particularly the case here because the adjacent properties <br />consist of residences that would be impacted by noise, light, loud music, <br />crowds, vehicle traffic and other activities that would be anticipated with the <br />uses allowed by the C-1 District. In comparison, a residential service use <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.