My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002.01.07 RESO 2002-0001
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2002 CC Resolutions
>
2002.01.07 RESO 2002-0001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 2:04:05 PM
Creation date
1/13/2015 4:39:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
1/7/2002
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution 2002- 1 <br />Page 2 <br />The hardships are unique to the property because the subject property is long <br />and narrow. The property to be divided is 553.50 feet X 1574.01 feet with the <br />553.50 feet fronting on Irish Avenue. Access from Irish Avenue would <br />require each lot to each be 276.75 feet wide. As for the side yard setback, to <br />maintain the 10 -acre minimum lot size, the proposed lot line would be 19.09 <br />feet from the existing garage, which would require a variance of 20.91 feet. <br />At the time the garage was constructed, it met all applicable setbacks. <br />c) The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent <br />of the ordinance. <br />The granting of the variance from the minimum lot width of 300 feet would be <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance by allowing the creation of <br />two 10 -acre parcels which are common and permissible in the Agricultural <br />zoning district. The granting of the variance for the side yard setback would <br />also be keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance because garages are <br />common accessory structures on residential property. <br />d) The property cannot be put to reasonable use without the granting of the <br />variance. <br />Without the proposed variances, the property could not be subdivided. Ten - <br />acre lots are permissible in the Agricultural Zoning District. <br />e) The variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the <br />locality in which it would be located. <br />The variances, if granted, would allow the creation of two 10 -acre parcels, <br />which are common and permissible in the Agricultural Zoning district. <br />The variance, if granted shall not have the effect of allowing, in any <br />district, any use prohibited in the district. <br />The variances would not alter the allowed uses of the property. <br />g) The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by the ordinance. <br />Variances for the required lot width and side yard setback would not permit a <br />lower degree of flood protection. At the time the vacant parcel is to be <br />developed, a final site drainage plan would be required by the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District. <br />h) The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject property is <br />in compliance with city and state codes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.