My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002.01.07 RESO 2002-0002
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2002 CC Resolutions
>
2002.01.07 RESO 2002-0002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 2:04:05 PM
Creation date
1/13/2015 4:39:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
1/7/2002
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 2002 — 2 <br />APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT DENYING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />AMENDMENT AND REZONING FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF FENWAY <br />AVENUE, SOUTH OF 140 STREET, AND NORTH OF THE TOWNHOMES OF <br />BALD EAGLE LAKE (TSCHIDA AND MOLITOR PROPERTIES) <br />WHEREAS, the City of Hugo initiated a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to <br />change the zoning from Multi -Family to General Industrial for property located west of Fenway <br />Avenue, south of 140x` Street, and north of the Townhomes of Bald Eagle Lake (Tschida and <br />Molitor properties); and, <br />WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows: <br />NE %, NE % and the SE V4, NE Y4 and the NE '/ , SE %, all within Section 30 T31N- <br />R21 W. <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing <br />and recommends denial; and <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the rezoning from Multi -Family <br />and Urban Residential to General Industrial, based on the following findings: <br />1. Rezoning the subject property to General Industrial would make it difficult to adequately <br />buffer the adjacent residential homes. <br />2. The City's General Industrial district allows a variety of high intensity uses that could <br />have adverse impacts on nearby residential properties. <br />3. Rezoning the subject property to General Industrial may result in greater tree removal <br />than if the property were developed with residential uses, because industrial <br />developments generally require larger building pads and large parking lot areas. <br />4. The physical characteristics of the property, including the location of wetland, floodplain, <br />and steep slopes, are not conducive to large industrial buildings. <br />ADOPTED by the City Council on January 7, 2002 <br />1 <br />�01? <br />ATTEST: <br />Mary Creager, City Cler <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.