My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002.06.17 RESO 2002-0025
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2002 CC Resolutions
>
2002.06.17 RESO 2002-0025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 2:04:06 PM
Creation date
1/13/2015 4:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
6/17/2002
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 2002- 25 <br />APPROVING SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A <br />DECK FOR CARRIE DORDING ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13921 <br />FOUNTAIN AVENUE NORTH <br />WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Carrie Dording that requests approval of a <br />variance to permit a deck five feet from the side lot line on property located at 13921 <br />Fountain Avenue North, as legally described as follows: <br />Lot 4, Block 1, Francine's Meadows. <br />WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments has reviewed said variance at <br />a duly called public meeting and recommends approval of the variance. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the <br />variance for Carrie Dording on property located at 13921 fountain Avenue North, subject <br />to the following conditions: <br />1. A variance is approved to allow a 12 -foot x 36 -foot deck five feet from the side <br />lot line in accordance with the application dated May 21, 2002. <br />2. The variances is approved based on the following findings: <br />a) The variance as requested is permissible bylaw. <br />The requested variance is from the dimensional requirements of the <br />ordinance and is permissible by law. <br />b) The strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship <br />because of circumstances unique to the individual property not caused by <br />the land owner. <br />The hardship is unique to the property because of the location of the <br />existing home and sliding glass door. The home was constructed 17 feet <br />from the north property line, and a sliding glass door was installed. The <br />applicant is desirous of installing a reasonable size deck to provide egress <br />from the home. <br />c) The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent <br />of the ordinance. <br />The footings for the deck would be located two feet outside of the five- <br />foot drainage and utility easement. The deck itself would cantilever up to <br />the easement and would not obstruct drainage. <br />d) The property can not be put to reasonable use without the granting of the <br />variance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.