My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001.04.02 RESO 2001-0012
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001 CC Resolutions
>
2001.04.02 RESO 2001-0012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 2:04:01 PM
Creation date
1/14/2015 8:46:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
4/2/2001
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF HUGO <br />WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />RESOLUTION 2001-12 <br />APPROVING FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR JOHN D. TOMNITZ FOR <br />PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7180 -177TH STREET NORTH <br />WHEREAS, an application has been filed by John D. Tomnitz that requests approval of a <br />front yard setback variance for a 1,600 square foot pole building on property located at <br />7180-177' Street North, as legally described as follows: <br />Insert Legal Description. <br />WHEREAS, the Boad of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments has reviewed said variance at <br />a duly called public meeting and recommends approval of the variance. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the site <br />plan for John Tomnitz on property located at 7180-177' Street N. subject to the following <br />conditions: <br />1. A 12 -foot front yard setback varinance is approved for a 1,600 square foot <br />building in accordance with the application dated December 19, 2000. <br />2. A building permit shall be required prior to constructing the building. <br />3. The variance is approved based on the following findings: <br />a. The variance as requested is permissible by law. <br />The requested variance is from the setback requirements of the ordinance and is <br />permissible by law. <br />b. The strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship <br />because of circumstances unique to the individual property not caused by the land <br />owner. <br />The hardship is unique to the property because the setback of the home far <br />exceeds the 40 -foot minimum front yard setback of the ordinance. The increase <br />setback of the home and the zoning ordinance requirement for the pole building to <br />be no closer to the road than is the home creates a unique hardship. Additionally, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.