My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001.05.07 RESO 2001-0014
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001 CC Resolutions
>
2001.05.07 RESO 2001-0014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 2:04:01 PM
Creation date
1/14/2015 8:46:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
5/7/2001
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 2001-14 <br />APPROVING SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR JOHN AND ROBYN <br />UDSTUEN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15190 EVERTON AVENUE NORTH <br />WHEREAS, an application has been filed by John and Robyn Udstuen that requests <br />approval of a side yard setback variance for a 1,200 square foot pole building on property <br />located at 15190 Everton Avenue North, as legally described as follows: <br />The south 330.72 feet of the north half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter, <br />according to U.S. Government Properotional Methods, of section 18, Township 31N, <br />Range 21 W, Washington County, Minnesota. <br />WHEREAS, the Boad of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments has reviewed said variance at <br />a duly called public meeting and recommends approval of the variance. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the <br />variance for John and Robyn Udstuen on property located at 15190 Everton Avenue, <br />subject to the following conditions: <br />1. A 20 -foot side yard setback varinance is approved for an approximately 1,200 <br />square foot building in accordance with the application dated April 12, 2001. <br />2. A building permit shall be required prior to constructing the building. <br />3. The variance is approved based on the following findings: <br />a) The variance as requested is permissible bylaw. <br />The requested variance is from the dimensional requirements of the ordinance <br />and is permissible by law. <br />b) The strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship <br />because of circumstances unique to the individual property not caused by <br />the landowner. <br />The hardship is unique to the property because of the location of the existing <br />home and septic system. The location of these improvements limit the area in <br />which to construct the accessory building. <br />The applicant constructed the existing home approximately 159 feet from the <br />north property line with plans to construct an accessory building between the <br />home and the north property line. At the time the applicant constructed the <br />existing home, the side yard setback was 20 feet. In July of 1999, the City <br />increased the side yard setback from 20 feet to 40 feet. Therefore, the <br />hardship was not caused by the landowner; but rather, a change in the setback <br />requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.