2001.11.05 RESO 2001-0066 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Resolution 2001- 66 Page 2 d) The property can not be put to reasonable use without the granting of the variance. The property is zoned for agricultural use. Pole buildings and other similar accessory buildings are a common use in the agricultural zoning district and are often needed for storage of equipment, personal belongings, and other items consistent with large lot agricultural/residential properties. e) The variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality in which it would be located. The agricultural pole barn would meet all applicable setback requirements, and as such would not alter the essential character of the area. Further, other properties in this area of the City have large agricultural pole buildings. The variance, if granted shall not have the effect of allowing, in any district, any use prohibited in the district. The proposed accessory building is a permitted use in the agricultural zoning district. g) The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood protection than required by the ordinance. The proposed building would not be within a designated floodplain. h) The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject property is in compliance with city and state codes. The new building would not require any improvements to the on-site sewage treatment or water systems found on the property. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 5, 2001. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Hugo, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Hugo City Council on November 5, 2001 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.