Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution 2001- 68 <br />Page 2 <br />The applicant has attempted to minimize the extent of the encroachment by <br />constructing a twelve -foot wide deck. Further, the deck would not encroach into <br />the six-foot drainage and utility easement. <br />d. The property cannot be put to reasonable use without the granting of the <br />variance. <br />The property is planned and zoned for residential use. The applicant is proposing <br />to add a deck to the south side of the home adjacent to an existing sliding glass <br />door. <br />e. The variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the <br />locality in which it would be located. <br />The proposed deck is consistent with the essential character of this residential <br />area. While the deck would encroach into the required setback, the deck is <br />relatively small and would not represent a significant encroachment. <br />f. The variance, if granted shall not have the effect of allowing, in any <br />district, any use prohibited in the district. <br />Decks are permitted in this residential zoning district. <br />g. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by the ordinance. <br />The proposed deck would not be within a designated floodplain. <br />h. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject property is <br />in compliance with city and state codes. <br />The proposed deck would not require any improvements to the municipal water <br />and sewer systems that serve this property. <br />ADOPTED by the City Council on November 5, 2001. <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA) <br />COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) SS. <br />The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Hugo, <br />Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the <br />Hugo City Council on November 5, 2001 with the original thereof on file in my office, <br />and the same is a correct transcription thereof. <br />