Laserfiche WebLink
u 0 <br />CITY OF HUGO <br />WASHINGTON COUNTY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />Council member Debra Barnes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2000-9 <br />RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR <br />TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-1 WITHIN DEVELOPMENT <br />DISTRICT NO. 1. <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Hugo, Minnesota (the "City"), <br />as follows: <br />Section 1. Recitals. <br />1.01. The City of Hugo (the "City") has heretofore established Tax Increment Financing District <br />No. 1-1 within Development District No. 1 and adopted a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") <br />therefor. It has been proposed that the City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan <br />Modification") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-1 ("District No. 1-1"); all pursuant to and in <br />conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections469.174through469.179(the"Act"), <br />all inclusive, as amended, all as reflected herein, and presented for the Council's consideration. Generally, <br />the substantive changes to the Tax Increment Financing Plan include an administrative modification to the <br />Plan's budget line items. This modification will not increase the Plan's total budget. The purpose of this <br />Plan Modification is to ensure the DistrictNo. l -1's budget accurately reflects project expenditures. The City <br />is not modifying the boundaries of District No. 1-1 or term of TIF District No. 1-1. <br />1.02. The Council has investigated the facts relating hereto. <br />1.03. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption and <br />approval of the proposed Modified Plan. Because of the nature of this modification, and because this <br />Modification does not entail an enlargement of geographic area, an increase in the amount of bonded <br />indebtedness, an increase to the amount of interest on debt, an increase in the portion of the captured net tax <br />capacity, or an increase in the total estimated tax increment expenditures, this modification is not subject to <br />a public hearing requirement. <br />Section 2. Findings: <br />2.01. The existing budget as adopted on February 7, 2000 for District No. 1-1 is attached hereto <br />in Exhibit A. The City is not increasing the total amount of the budget or total project costs to be financed <br />from tax increment in District No. 1-1. The City hereby modifies the budget for District No. 1-1 as <br />illustrated in Exhibit A attached hereto. <br />2.02. The Council hereby reaffirms the original findings previously made for District No. 1-1, <br />as a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10 (a)(1). <br />