Laserfiche WebLink
.PART III. <br />GOALS, POLICY AND STANDARDS <br />In the past, community planning has dealt with factors related <br />primarily to "physical" features, such as the location of housing, <br />shopping centers, industrial sites and the like. Only during the past <br />ten years have other elements gained proper recognition, with these <br />being economic and social considerations, ecology, governmental <br />efficiency and the entire area of "policy planning". <br />What is likely to happen in Hugo during the next few decades and what <br />do the residents want to happen? Within the bounds of legal, social, and <br />economic reasonableness, Hugo can be shaped much as the citizens desire. <br />This can be done via the "policy planning" method as follows: <br />1. Setting of Goals - If certain things are desired these should be <br />stated as specific goals to be achieved. An adequate open space <br />system, a satisfactory transportation network, and other desires <br />can be stated as general and translated into more specific objective-. <br />2. Policy,- Once goals have been set, "policy" is the official course <br />of action adopted and utilized to attain the desired goals. For <br />example, a goal to provide adequate open space in the Village. <br />should be accompanied by a policy statement of how this goal is <br />to be achieved. <br />3. Standards - Urban and rural development and maintenance standard-, <br />are measures of quality. These are usually considered as the <br />"minimum" quality desired and some standards may be enacted into <br />law via zoning, subdivision, housing, building and other codLs <br />and ordinances. Such standards also tend to serve as "goals" <br />although not necessarily the "ultimate" goals since they are <br />considered the minimum necessary for the public welfare. <br />To the extent feasible, the goals and policies should reflect the <br />general desires and aspirations of the citizens of the Community. These <br />should be reviewed on a periodic basis and adequately reflected iii the <br />standards set for controlling and guiding growth and development <br />the Village. <br />Ir, order to maximize the opportunity of the citizens to participate in <br />the planning process, two methods were utilized: (1) a public <br />informational meeting was held to provide an open forum for discussion <br />of planning and the future of the Village; and (2) a planning questionn- <br />aire was made available to all residents and property owners in atten- <br />dance at the public meeting asking their opinions and desires relatin'7 <br />to future growth and development. The following text on goals, polic"_. <br />and standards is based upon the results of such efforts. <br />A_ (;n Ai S <br />Approximately one hundred twenty-five (125) persons attended a public <br />meeting on November 8, 1972, to express their opinions, interests and <br />desires concerning the future development of the Village. A clear <br />14 <br />