Laserfiche WebLink
1. The Village should recognize and continue the Washington <br />County concept of a parkway system. A parkway is proposed <br />to follow Oneka Lake Boulevard and Hardwood Creek into Forest <br />Lake Township. <br />2. The Village should coordinate its designated major thorough- <br />fare system with the County Engineer in establishing future <br />right-of-ways. <br />3. Transportation planning should recognize and include snow- <br />mobiles, horse trails, hiking trails, pedestrian circulation, <br />and other similar forms of movement. <br />4. Future transportation should be planned on the assumption <br />that there will be a coordinated "system" including new forms <br />of mass transit as well as more conventional modes of travel. <br />5. Minor street openings (usually residential) onto thoroughfares <br />should be minimized to improve traffic flow and reduce traffic <br />hazards. <br />6. All streets should intersect at right angles to avoid traffic <br />hazards and to prevent the formation of unusable and odd - <br />shaped parcels of land. <br />7. Wherever possible, streets should follow line of main drainage. <br />8. Left turn lanes should be provided for moderate to heavy traffic. <br />9. Curb parking should not be permitted on thoroughfares and <br />collector streets with moderate to heavy traffic. (The courts <br />have ruled that parking on a public street is not a right; it <br />is a privilege which may be granted or taken away at will.) <br />The purpose of a street is to move traffic; as such, the decision <br />to permit or to ban curb parking should be a technical decision <br />based upon traffic needs rather than a political decision. <br />However, off-street parking should be provided in cases where <br />traffic necessitates the banning of on -street parking. <br />10. Where future traffic is expected to be exceptionally heavy on <br />major thoroughfares, right-of-way in addition to the minimum <br />of 80 feet should be acquired; an alternative is to require <br />an additional set -back along the route in anticipation of <br />future acquisition. <br />11. The right-of-way, number of moving lanes, and the determination <br />of whether parking should be permitted must be related to the <br />anticipated future peak traffic volumes which can be expected. <br />12. Street systems should be designed to serve morning and evening <br />"rush hours" not 24 hour traffic volumes. These peak or <br />design volumes, when computed from assigned and projected traffic <br />demand in terms of vehicles per hour to a future design year, <br />allow the calculation of capacity needs. <br />27 <br />