My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014.12.15 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2014 CC Minutes
>
2014.12.15 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 1:46:24 PM
Creation date
2/2/2015 5:03:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for December 15, 2014 <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />Approval of CUP for Additional Animal Units at 17260 Ingersoll Avenue North <br />Cindy Bellamy and Shirley Smith have submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit <br />(CUP) to allow double the amount of animal units allowed on property. The applicant is <br />requesting to have 14 horses on the property where seven are allowed by ordinance. The <br />ordinance allows double the amount of animal units with a CUP and an approved facilities and <br />waste management plan. At its December 4, 2014 meeting, the Planning Commission held a <br />public hearing and recommended Council approve the CUP application with a vote of 4-2. Two <br />residents spoke in opposition of the issuance of the CUP citing mismanagement of manure, <br />drainage onto other properties, and excessive number of horses. <br />Planner Rachel Juba presented the application to the Council. She explained that this was <br />initially brought to the City's attention as a complaint on the management of the animal waste, <br />drainage onto neighboring property, and the excessive number of horses on the property. Staff <br />inspected the property and found there were violations and provided the applicant with a letter <br />outlining them and requesting compliance. Staff met on site with the property owner on several <br />occasions and made contact with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA) to ensure all <br />State regulations in regard to feedlots and manure stockpiling are being met. The applicant has <br />been working with staff and the PCA to correct the violations and to comply with City ordinance <br />and State standards. The PCA has issued the applicant a letter of compliance, and staff is <br />comfortable with the management plan as submitted. Rachel reviewed with Council the criteria <br />for approval of a CUP and stated that the application meets all the requirements. <br />Property owner Cindy Bellamy stated that her horses have been on the property for 18 years, and <br />she thought her property was in compliance. She said she is addressing the manure issue, and <br />she explained that part of it is used for spreading on her property and the rest is taken elsewhere. <br />She said she is now familiar with the rules and has no problem complying. <br />Vince Niemczyk, 17233 Henna Avenue North, stated he has no problem with horses but is <br />concerned about the water in the ditch that runs into Judicial Ditch 2. He also asked if a <br />contractual agreement should be required to spread manure on another's property. <br />June Young, 17396 Ingersoll Avenue North, asked Council to consider six horses on the <br />property. She said she has not seen the manure removed, just moved. Her main concern is <br />manure runoff into the water. <br />Larry Keck, 17376 Ingersoll Avenue North, stated that the culvert is on his property, and if the <br />culvert is moved, runoff will still go onto his land no matter where they put it. He said that no <br />manure has been removed from the property, and that he had a survey showing that wetlands <br />have been filled. He talked about another complaint in 2004 that was resolved by getting grazing <br />rights on other properties. He said he didn't think a CUP was needed to regulate her; she has 9.1 <br />acres and should only have six horse regardless of whether she has the CUP. He also said that <br />she is still regulated as a feedlot, and it is not 100 feet from his wetland, so it is in violation. <br />The Council discussed the wetlands, elevations of the paddocks, lack of complete compliance, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.