Laserfiche WebLink
City Council meeting of March 19, 2001 <br />Page 3 <br />Kitty Cheesebrow, who lives across the street from the property, supported the project stating that the <br />site would be a beautiful location for a park. <br />James Weber, Harrow Avenue, questioned how much of the property was "swamp", and was informed <br />there were seven acres of wetland. He felt that the appraised price was too much considering the amount <br />of wetlands. Because the lake is shallow, Mr. Weber felt that a pier would have to go too far into the <br />lake to be serviceable. He also suggested that the City consider purchasing the Seever property and <br />develop part of it to recoup part of the investment. Mr. Weber expressed real concern that acquisition of <br />the Bernin property would be a forerunner to a trail around the lake. <br />Tom Bina, Oneka Lake Boulevard, supported acquisition of the property, but with certain restrictions: <br />no motorized watercraft; no trails; no disturbance of vegetation; and preservation of lake. <br />Bonnie Weber, Oneka Lake Blvd, questioned if an EIS was necessary, as well as the type of park would <br />be established. Community Development Director John Rask stated that the park would have passive <br />open space usage and that an environmental review is part of the grant application. She was concerned <br />that wildlife be protected. <br />Dan Wittkop, Egg Lake Road, a young man who fished the lake, felt that a pier would be a great place <br />for kids to go fishing. <br />Robyn LaCasse, Chair of the Parks Commission, stated that it was the intent of the Commission to have <br />the property remain pristine, and that if the property would be sold to developers, the wildlife would lose <br />their habitat. <br />The public hearing was closed for Council consideration. Council member Petryk reiterated that it was <br />the City's intent to keep the land as a `natural" park. Mayor Miron discussed the differences in the <br />Seever/Bernin properties for use as a park, and their monetary value. <br />Miron made motion, Petryk seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION 2001-7, AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO <br />SUBMIT A MNDNR NATURAL AND SCENIC AREA GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE BERNIN <br />PROPERTY. <br />VOTING AYE: Haas, Petryk, Puleo, Miron <br />Motion Carried. <br />KATIE POIRIER LEGISLATION <br />At a recent Council meeting, Council member Becky Petryk presented Council with material she had <br />obtained from a local resident supporting the Katie Poirier legislation. This issue was placed on a <br />subsequent Council meeting but tabled to complete additional research with the assistance of the League <br />of Minnesota Cities. City staff spoke extensively with the LMC research officials and found that the <br />legislation material submitted to Council member Petryk was outdated, and was, in fact, for the 2000 <br />legislative session; therefore, there is no action required of the Hugo City Council regarding this <br />legislation. The new legislation that was recently introduced in the Minnesota State Legislature <br />regarding additional changes sought by supporters of the Katie Poirier legislation is for security systems <br />that include high-resolution video cameras and VCR playback machines. Staff presented this material to <br />Council for information purposes only, and (staff) and the League does not take a position, nor do they <br />advocate at this time, that the Council take a position regarding this proposed new legislation. Council <br />member Petryk asked that this matter be placed on the Council meeting agenda for April 2, 2001, for <br />further clarification from City Administrator Mike Ericson. <br />