My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008.03.13 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2008 PC Minutes
>
2008.03.13 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 2:29:12 PM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:11:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/13/2008
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes — March 16, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br />All aye. Motion carried. <br />Weidt made a motion, seconded by Rosenquist, to forward the hunting issues on to the City <br />Council without a recommendation. <br />There was discussion on changing the motion. Rosenquist withdrew his second. <br />Weidt made a motion, seconded by Rosenquist, to forward to the Council the recommendation to <br />maintain the language that is currently in the Comprehensive Plan related to hunting on City <br />property, public land, and water. <br />Aye: McRoberts, Weidt, Moore, Rosenquist <br />Nay: Schumann and Kleissler <br />Motion carried 4-2 <br />Schumann asked staff to hold a meeting with Kevin Rhodes on the Bald Eagle Sportsman's <br />Association concerns. <br />Schumann talked about the proposed trail around Oneka Lake and the concerns from the <br />property owners around there. CDD stated that the Parks Commission recommended having the <br />trail shown on the map, to encourage developers to have a trail if they develop in that area. There <br />are trails shown in the rural area of Hugo also. <br />Weidt stated that this is a long range plan. He said he thought the map should stay, and we could <br />just strengthen language that stated that it would only be proposed if development occurs. <br />The City Planner stated that staff can strengthen that language. <br />Schumann talked about the emails the City received in regarding the area of 165th Street and <br />Elmcrest regarding some of the property owners not wanting to be in the MUSA boundary. He <br />stated that we need to look at this more since only two people emailed. He suggested having a <br />neighborhood meeting. <br />CDD stated that staff can hold a neighborhood meeting. <br />CDD stated that at the meeting of March 6, 2008, the Planning Commission did vote on the east <br />Oneka Lake area including Greene Avenue. McRoberts stated that the change may be a <br />transition issue. Schumann stated that some people in the area had questions about how their <br />taxes would be effected by being within the MUSA boundary. He suggested having a <br />neighborhood meeting with the City Assessor to answer the questions the property owners have. <br />Tom Bina, of 7115 Oneka Lake Boulevard, gave a letter to the Planning Commission from a <br />resident in his neighbor regarding the proposed MUSA boundary. <br />Schumann asked if the Planning Commission can leave the rest of the discussion to the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.