My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008.03.27 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2008 PC Minutes
>
2008.03.27 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 2:29:21 PM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:11:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/27/2008
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes — March 27, 2008 <br />Page 4 <br />Moore thought they should plan for sewers in the area. <br />Kleissler said there should not be sewer in the rural area. <br />Phil Watkins, 13345 Homestead Avenue, said he was at the CSAH 7-8-9 reconstruction meeting <br />and it was apparent the residents in the agricultural area do not want the added traffic brought on <br />by development. <br />Fred Hummel, 7225 Oneka Lake Boulevard, suggested they also consider the wetland areas on <br />some of the large lots and pointed out that those areas would not be developable. <br />John Waller, 14310 Homestead Avenue North, said JD #2, Brown's Creek, and JD#1 were <br />natural dividers. The large property owners have spoken and it would be appropriate to size the <br />pipe larger in the JD#2 flowage area. <br />Kevin Aufderhar, 7325 132"d Street, said it made no sense to go from high density to low <br />density, back to high density. He said the character of eastern Hugo should be preserved. <br />John Waller talked more about how the area was broken up by the watersheds and about <br />continuing the pattern set on the west side by mixing 10 and 20 acre lots with high density. <br />Kathy Scobie, 7676 120th Street North, said the petition she circulated was to show those who <br />wanted to preserve open space, not high density. Ten -acre lots would be stove pipe lots, and <br />there would be driveways every 300 feet. <br />Clyde Wagner, 8650 136th Street North, asked about a letter that was sent out by the City to only <br />certain property owners. <br />The CDD explained letters were sent only to those whose land use designation was proposed to <br />be changed. <br />Phil Watkins said he thought five -acre development was a good compromise and questioned why <br />sewer and water should go there. He commented that large land owners were never promised <br />they could develop their land, and they should not have expected it. To allow development at <br />more than one home per five acres would offend many property owners. <br />John Waller said there was no rule in the township days regarding lot size. <br />Wally Stoltzman, 8139 157th Street North, said he thought the Comp Plan needed to be flexible <br />because we do not know what the future holds. <br />Victoria Hoffbeck, 8110 1201h Street North, said large land owners have much of their property <br />classified as Green Acres, which has lower taxes, so taxes should not be an issue; they will still <br />make money on their land. Forcing development has forced foreclosures, and cluster housing <br />will not preserve land. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.