My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007.07.26 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2007 PC Minutes
>
2007.07.26 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 2:27:53 PM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:31:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
7/26/2007
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes — July 26, 2007 <br />Page 3 <br />parcel could be an issue in the future. <br />Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />McRoberts made motion, Schumann seconded, to recommend approval of the conditional use <br />permit and variances for the property line adjustment. <br />Aye: Bailly, McRoberts, Moore, Rosenquist, Schumann <br />Nay: Weidt <br />Motion carried. <br />Multi -Feeder Variances and Site Plan <br />The Commission considered the request of Neal Nordling, 4821 White Bear Parkway, White <br />Bear Lake, for site plan review for a building on 7.05 acre site located at Lot 3, Block 1, Bald <br />Eagle Industrial Park 4th addition. The plan consisted of a two story building totaling 28,331 <br />square feet for use by Mutifeeder Technology and showed two future building sites that would <br />not be approved as part of the site plan review. The Associate Planner explained that when the <br />applicant was ready to develop the rest of the site, they would need to subdivide the property or <br />apply for a conditional use permit for a campus development to allow three buildings on one <br />parcel. <br />The Associate Planner explained the applicant was also requesting approval of two variances. <br />The first variance was from the north and south side yard setback requirements to permit the two <br />future buildings to be built 10 feet from the side property line where the ordinance required the <br />buildings to be set back at a distance that is at least equal to the height of the building, and in no <br />case less than 10 feet. The second variance request was from the front yard setback to permit a <br />sign to be located at the property line where a 30 foot setback from the property line was <br />required. <br />McRoberts asked if the infiltration basins were on low ground and if the pond could be pulled <br />back to have the sign in compliance. <br />Bear said there was some flexibility to redesigning the infiltration basins. <br />Schumann said there were minimum sizes to these basins, and he asked if it would be <br />appropriate for the applicant to withdraw the request for the variances <br />Bear said they could do that and reapply in the future when they had a site plan. <br />Schumann opened the public hearing. <br />Bruce Schwartzman, 2680 South Shore Boulevard, White Bear Lake, said he was the architect <br />for the Nordling property, and he had been working with staff and found the industrial park to be <br />exemplary in design. The infiltration ponds had been designed with a gradual slope and a <br />steeper pond would be more difficult to maintain. To move any of the ponds to the east would <br />create more hardships to the lots. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.