Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes — February 9, 2006 <br />Page 4 <br />drives except for four units. The plan complied with lot size and set back requirements. Staff was <br />requesting revision to the landscape plan and a plan showing where snow would be stored. Staff was <br />also of the opinion that it met the purpose and intent of the Multi -Family Guidelines. <br />Dean Gannon, Cross Country Properties, explained that the original plan showed 34 units but had <br />been reduced to 30 units because of wetland issues, and the floor plan provided multi -generational <br />living with main floor bedrooms. <br />Schumann asked about providing a brick wrap-around to comply with the multi -family guidelines or <br />whether addition shrubbery could be planted along the sides of the homes. <br />Gannon said they could add additional landscaping; they wanted to make the homes affordable. <br />McRoberts asked what the selling price of the homes would be. <br />Gannon said they would be around $200,000. <br />Joanne, exterior designer, showed vinyl siding, brick, and shingle samples of neutral tones saying she <br />realized it was a more rural setting and the units would blend in better with the environment. There <br />were four different siding colors and no buildings would be the same. Different shake sidings would <br />give each home its own personal look. White trim of wider width than normal would be used. <br />Schumann suggested stone be used to wrap around the sides of the buildings. <br />Schumann reconvened the public hearing. <br />Rogers Seekins, 6130 150th Street North, said he lived in Oneka Lakeview Townhomes and asked that <br />the name of the development be changed. <br />Dick Keeling, 6102 150th Street North, asked if a traffic study had been done. Additional traffic <br />would be added to an already crowed road, and he asked if it could be routed a different way. <br />The CDD provided an update on the traffic. The City had submitted an application to MN DOT for a <br />traffic signal on Oneka Lake Boulevard and Highway 61 but was turned down. The City would <br />continue to pursue funding for a signal. <br />Keeling asked how drainage would be handled and if they would be adding additional water to the <br />pond on the Oneka Lakeview Development. <br />Duane Bengston, 6110 1501h Street North, questioned the setbacks on the building at the SE corner <br />and he questioned whether the landscaping would match that of the Oneka Lakeview townhomes. <br />Gannon said the setback was 25 feet. <br />There were no other comments, and Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />Don, a representative of Cross Country Properties who had worked on the architecture on the project, <br />explained they would be varying the depths on certain features on the entrances of the buildings, and <br />the shakes and gables would provide a craftsman look. Stone would be located around the columns <br />