Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes — April 13, 2006 <br />Page 5 <br />Schumann explained that it was a legal non -conforming business and the City would like to see it <br />removed. <br />Rennae Glidden, 7215 137th Street, said she owned 21 t/z acres and moved there 12 years ago for the <br />land and space. She said under the normal zoning, they would only be able to get three houses on the <br />property because they could not meet the 300 feet lot width requirement. She questioned whether it <br />was 40 contiguous acres since it was divided by the road and the pond further divided it. She felt they <br />should not be given credit for preserving the environment since the septic system was so close to the <br />pond. <br />John Southward, 7307 132nd Street North, said the lots should have a ten -acre minimum and the septic <br />system should not be next to the pond. <br />Schumann pointed out that the properties met at in the center of the road so they actually did connect, <br />and 50 percent or more of the site being left as open space would ensure it would never develop. <br />There were no other comments and Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />Rosenquist said he had a hard time granting bonuses for an open space that was not usable, and with <br />the outlot being on the other side of the road than the homes, it could become an attractive nuisance. <br />He also wanted to see the design of the septic system. <br />Hoffbeck had issues with the plan meeting the general intent of the ordinance. It did not fit the area. <br />and the open space did not connect to the community and was unusable. She had concerns about an <br />HOA for a small group being properly managed, and said street lights did not belong in a rural area. <br />Weidt agreed that Outlot A would not be a worthwhile piece of land. <br />Bailly said she believed that more homes it what should be expected with the rural preservation <br />program, but it did not look like they met the density bonus. The septic system could ruin what is there <br />right now. <br />Brent Thompson, Stoney River Development, said they made many revisions to the concept plan the <br />Commission had reviewed, and the property to the north perked nicely for the septic, which would be <br />managed by Connexus Energy. He said the purpose of the plan was to preserve everything to the <br />north. They could mitigate the wetlands and get homes back there but instead were preserving the <br />features. Bird houses and other features on the open space would discourage snowmobilers and ATV <br />riders. The location of the septic system exceeded the required setback and under the current <br />ordinance, two homes with two septic systems could be located there. The open space could <br />potentially be accessed in the future for homes should neighboring parcels develop. <br />Greg Priest, Stoney River Development, said firefighters do not take apparatuses off paved surfaces, <br />and the area could be accessed by crossing the pond in winter months and by boat in the summer. <br />Hoffbeck said that even construction of two homes on the north and a few on the south would not be as <br />much impact as 12 homes. There were too many homes in the wrong area. <br />Thompson said they did not want street lights on the road. The lots would be 1 t/4 - 3/4 acre in size and <br />architectural controls would provide for homes of the same value as existing homes in the area. <br />