Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes — December 22, 2005 <br />Page 4 <br />Ashkar said the homes would be two -stories. <br />The planner said sewer and water would not go down Goodview Avenue; a lift station would be <br />used. The developers were still working with the City on those issues. <br />Schumann pointed out that infrastructure would be constructed at the developer's expense. <br />Peltier said there was access to the piece north of Wilderness View I, it was not all wetland and <br />there were woods there until it was flooded by the Beaver Ponds Development. He said the <br />south property had always been agricultural and many areas of the field were higher than <br />Wilderness View. He indicated that the building on the property was partly used by the cell <br />tower and they needed access to it. He said he was not dumping landscape materials in a location <br />that would be hard for him to access and, he did process wood with wood burners but would no <br />longer be doing that type of business. <br />Jim Zerwas said he was the president of Interstate Lumber Company for many years and many <br />products had creosote which is no longer permitted, and the cost of getting rid of it is huge. He <br />questioned how anyone knew that none of it was on Kevin's property. <br />Brian Gabrio, 5858 128th Alcove North, was concerned that there would be more storage on the <br />Peltier property and about the drainage. <br />Schumann told him that all subdivisions needed to have a drainage plan that was reviewed by the <br />City. <br />McRoberts noted that because the entire 98.5 acre parcel was being rezoned, the PUD would <br />include a restriction to additional buildings on the outlot. <br />There were no other comments and Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />Hoffbeck questioned the flag lots, how many feet would be between the homes, and how big the <br />lots were. <br />Ashkar said approximately ten feet between buildings and the lots ranged from 14,000 to 10,400 <br />square feet. <br />Hoffbeck said flag lots could be more preferable to those seeking more privacy. The CDD pointed <br />out that it was not always the home on the flag lot that was less preferable, but the home on adjacent <br />lots; the backs of the home could face the front of another. <br />Hoffbeck asked if it could be addressed in the HOA. The CDD said review of the building plans <br />does not include the orientation of the homes. Ashkar said he would be comfortable with putting it <br />in the bylaws. <br />Bailly pointed out that with homes on the flag lots pushed closer to the streets, the other homes <br />