My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014.12.04 PC Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2014 PC Packets
>
2014.12.04 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2015 11:08:11 AM
Creation date
2/20/2015 12:50:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
12/4/2014
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13. Feedlot Components (continued) <br />'"' double-click "' <br />to insert checkmarks <br />in these columns <br />Checklist <br />Questions <br />Y <br />N -. <br />NA <br />I NI <br />Notes: <br />B.1 <br />is Registration current (date within previous 4 -year block)? <br />of Natural Resources (DNR)? 7020.2015, sub . 2 <br />0.1 <br />f32 <br />Have animal units and animal species, types and numbers changed since <br />3.2 <br />Are clean -water diversions in place; operational and maintalned? <br />_ . <br />the most recent registration or inspection? <br />3.3 <br />Are runoff controls in place, operational, and maintained? <br />y <br />Have animal holding areas or manure storage areas changed since the <br />Is there evidence of runoff leaving the open lot(s) or runoff oontrol(s)? <br />B.3 <br />most recent pemtit, Notice of Construction or Expansion, MlnnFarm or <br />(past or present) <br />., <br />.-... <br />Inspection? <br />rf�'bIly�ar, <br />ra <br />• <br />s@ <br />E <br />h.4 <br />4 ' ;: <br />Inspection Requirement <br />c <br />NC <br />NA <br />NI <br />fid <br />Construction or expansion requirements met <br />_. <br />commonly owned feedlots adjacent to or within ''%mile of this feedlot <br />PPgD <br />020.0405; su b. 2 <br />Is there evidence runoff reached surface waters or tile intakes, <br />sinkholes, fractured bedrock, well, mine or quarry? <br />meet or exceed the CAFO threshold (# of head per species) or 1,000 - <br />�: ✓•: <br />C. Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Identification <br />. Checklist Questions <br />Y <br />N <br />NA <br />I NI <br />Notes: <br />- <br />Does the maximum capacity of this feedlot meet or exceed the CAP <br />:. <br />of Natural Resources (DNR)? 7020.2015, sub . 2 <br />0.1 <br />threshold (# of head per species) or 1,000 animal units? <br />3.2 <br />Are clean -water diversions in place; operational and maintalned? <br />_ . <br />(if yes the feedlots must seek NPDES Permit Coverage) <br />3.3 <br />Are runoff controls in place, operational, and maintained? <br />y <br />Does the owner own (all or part of) other feedlots adjacent to or within y.'`• <br />Is there evidence of runoff leaving the open lot(s) or runoff oontrol(s)? <br />mile of this feedlot?- <br />(past or present) <br />., <br />.-... <br />If Yes- Evaluate the following: <br />rf�'bIly�ar, <br />ra <br />i :•P <br />s@ <br />E <br />h.4 <br />4 ' ;: <br />.. <br />Does the maximum capacity of this feedlot combined with other <br />_. <br />commonly owned feedlots adjacent to or within ''%mile of this feedlot <br />PPgD <br />3.4 <br />Is there evidence runoff reached surface waters or tile intakes, <br />sinkholes, fractured bedrock, well, mine or quarry? <br />meet or exceed the CAFO threshold (# of head per species) or 1,000 - <br />�: ✓•: <br />inadequate buffer, steep slopes, channels, matted or dead vegetation, <br />(e.g.9 P P 0 <br />C.2 <br />animal units? <br />clean water run-on, stortmdater flow) <br />rG <br />(If yes the feedlots must seek a NPDES Permit - refer to MPCA) <br />Does the owner use common land application acres for This feedlot <br />- <br />and other commonly owned feedlots, and if so do the feedlots <br />... <br />combined meet or exceed the CA FO threshold (# of head per species) <br />., <br />or 1,000 animal units? <br />if yes the feedlots must a NPDES Permit- refer to MPGA) <br />- <br />Is the owner required to seek NPDES/SDS permit coverage for this <br />C.4 <br />feedlot and other commonly owned feedlots? <br />(Refer to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)) <br />1. Open Lot Agreement (OLA) <br />2. Animal Confinement Barn(s) <br />Checklist Questions <br />2.1 Is any manure seepage from bare <br />Does uoslooe water drain throuol <br />3. Open Lot(s) <br />Not Applicable to this Facility <br />NA I NI. <br />Checklist Questions <br />Y <br />N <br />NA <br />NI <br />31 <br />Do animals have access to a lake classified by the Minnesota Department <br />:. <br />of Natural Resources (DNR)? 7020.2015, sub . 2 <br />3.2 <br />Are clean -water diversions in place; operational and maintalned? <br />_ . <br />v <br />3.3 <br />Are runoff controls in place, operational, and maintained? <br />y <br />Is there evidence of runoff leaving the open lot(s) or runoff oontrol(s)? <br />(past or present) <br />., <br />If Yes -Evaluate the following: - <br />I + <br />f"' <br />4 ' ;: <br />Is runoff currently reaching surface waters? <br />PPgD <br />3.4 <br />Is there evidence runoff reached surface waters or tile intakes, <br />sinkholes, fractured bedrock, well, mine or quarry? <br />inadequate buffer, steep slopes, channels, matted or dead vegetation, <br />(e.g.9 P P 0 <br />e"w. ` <br />clean water run-on, stortmdater flow) <br />rG <br />Page 1 of 3 of the Checklist <br />Notes: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.