Laserfiche WebLink
Bellamy and Smith CUP <br />Page 4 <br />The applicant has summited a facility and waste management plan. The plan outlines the <br />management of each `lot" in the feedlot area in regards to frequency of manure removal and <br />paddock clean up, stockpile locations, removal of manure, and land application. Staff is <br />comfortable with the management plan as submitted. <br />The PCA allows manure stockpiling on properties for no longer than a year. The stockpiles shall <br />be spread on the pasture areas or removed from the property after a year. <br />As a condition of approval, staff is requiring Lot E to be graded to the dirt base, like the other <br />"lots" in the feedlots area, and all manure be removed from the property. This is work that shall <br />be completed at the time the culvert on the west side is relocated. This relocation is further <br />described in the next section. <br />Drainage <br />During an inspection of the property on August 21, 2014, with the PCA it was found that there <br />was run-off from the paddock areas in to the road ditch, the wetland to the north, and onto the <br />neighboring property through a culvert. The PCA stated there were violations in regards to water <br />quality discharge standards. The applicant was requested by the PCA to correct the State <br />violations in regards to the run-off in the road ditch and wetland. Staff requested the applicant to <br />re -direct the run-off away from the neighboring property onto their own property. <br />The applicant graded the paddock areas and used sandbags to provide berms around the fences in <br />areas in an effort to keep all run-off in the paddocks. After an inspection on September 22, 2014, <br />the PCA issued a letter to the applicant stating the property was in compliance with State rules. <br />There is a culvert on the west side of the paddocks that drains the paddock (Lot E). Although the <br />PCA stated that the drainage meets its water quality discharge standards, the drainage is going <br />onto the neighboring property. On October 24, 2014, staff met the applicant on the property to go <br />over ways to redirect the drainage and to relocate the culvert. Staff and the property owner <br />arrived at a solution that involves adding 100 feet of culvert along the north property line. The <br />applicant has not completed this to date, but it is a condition of approval. Redirecting the <br />drainage is not easy because the property naturally drains this way. The applicant will be <br />required to grade the paddock area to ensure the drainage will flow correctly to the culvert. The <br />applicant will be required to remove the existing culvert and add a new culvert at the correct <br />slope to redirect the drainage. <br />4. ANAYSIS OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: <br />A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making <br />The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or <br />not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the City's Comprehensive Land Use <br />Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. <br />