Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director John Rask. <br />The committee met on November 14, 2001 to discuss potential options for the property. The <br />committee examined in detail the natural features of the Molitor site and found that given the <br />location of wetlands and floodplain that much of the site could not accommodate larger building <br />footprints commonly found in industrial developments. However, the committee found that the <br />site could accommodate smaller office building pads. <br />The Committee met again on November 27, 2001, and concluded that both the Molitor and <br />Cheeta properties should be considered in the adoption of a new office zoning district given the <br />close proximity of the two parcels. The committee decided to meet again to discuss the potential <br />uses in this district and hold a public hearing on the rezoning at the Planning Commission meeting <br />of December 19, 2001. <br />Rosenquist made motion, Peltier seconded, to recommend denial of the rezoning from Multi -Family <br />to General Industrial, and to schedule a public hearing to consider adoption of a new zoning district to <br />included office type uses. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />Granger & Granger L.L.P. Site Plan Approval for 14849 Forest Blvd. N. <br />The Planning Commission considered the request of Granger & Granger, L.L.P. for site plan approval <br />for a 1,800 square foot addition to the existing building located at 14849 Forest Blvd. The addition <br />would be located on the east side of the existing building and would meet all required building <br />setbacks. The building would be occupied by general retail and service businesses. <br />The applicant would also add a new facade to the building and improve the parking lot to <br />accommodate 37 parking stall and construction of a barrier type curb. Access to the property was <br />provided from Highway 61 and 148`h Street with the access along 148`h Street generally unrestricted, <br />which has created an unsafe situation. The proposed parking lot construction would close all the <br />existing access points with the exception of the 148`h access located on the far east side of the site and <br />a barrier curb would be installed to control access. The proposed parking lot would encroach <br />approximately six feet into the right-of-way of 148'h Street north to allow two-way traffic circulation <br />in the parking lot. Staff found that the requested encroachment would greatly enhance traffic <br />circulation on the site, and would allow the applicant to close the unsafe accesses. The City's Public <br />Works Director had reviewed the site plan and found it acceptable. There are no utilities on this side <br />of the street that would be impacted by the encroachment. A formal encroachment agreement would <br />be required to allow the parking lot to encroach into the public right-of-way. <br />A landscape plan had been provided showing a variety of shrubs and ornamental trees near the <br />foundation of the building. The proposed plan showed no exterior lighting. The applicant said he <br />would install lighting on the building by each entrance, and he felt there was sufficient lighting from <br />adjacent buildings and the street light at the corner of Highway 61 and 1481h Street North. <br />Staff found that the requested site plan complies with the applicable ordinance requirements and <br />