Laserfiche WebLink
P.C. Meeting June 24, 1998 - Page 2 <br />Janet Schuneman Brandon Preserve Subdivision/P.U.D. <br />Janet R. Schuneman, 5420 117th St. N. and Cedarwoods Homes, Inc., 2202 5th St., White Bear Lake, <br />MN, had requested to subdivide approximately 82.27 acres of land into 15 lots for single family homes <br />and four outlots. The property is located in the RRl and Agricultural zoning districts, east of Goodview <br />Avenue and south of 130th Street. This property is guided for Urban Preserve and Rural Residential <br />development in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The fifteen unit density requested by the developers is <br />greater than that typically allowed by the City in these Zoning classifications. Their argument was that <br />they are moving five existing lots from Block One, Brandon Acres, to a more suitable development <br />location, as well as clustering homes from the additional 68.9 acres being developed. <br />Rubenzer read the public notice as published in the White Bear Press. <br />A representive of the developer stated they had been to the Planning Commission twice before with <br />concept plans and revised their plans accordingly to problems that had been addressed. He pointed out an <br />emergency -access -only road they added to their plan. <br />Peltier questioned where 130th was and would be. <br />A representative of the developer showed where 130th was on the plat and said an old plat showed a road <br />going east off Goodview. This was designated as 130th but the road was never improved. <br />Peltier opened the public hearing. <br />Mary Zerwas, 12725 Goodview Ave. N, claimed she bought outlot C from Mr. Schuneman (now <br />deceased) and an easement was granted so he could get back to farm the land. <br />Jim Zerwas, 12725 Goodview Ave. N., showed a copy of the legal description to the Planning <br />Commission, and said he sold Carl a temporary easement until 130th was put in. <br />The City Administrator explained that the City does not decide who owns the land, but ownership <br />obviously needs to be determined. <br />Gary Strumpfer, 12833 Goodview Ave. N., said no detailed engineer study has been done, and many <br />issues needed to be addressed such as watershed and impact on the pond, which Mr. Schuneman once said <br />was spring fed. Strumpfer wanted to know who was responsible to ascertain environmental impact. <br />Schumann said not every developer requires an EAW. <br />Brian Kass, 12855 Goodview Ave., would like a DNR impact study done. He also questioned how they <br />can do cluster housing when parcels are not even close in proximity. <br />A resident questioned one of the outlots that was zoned differently, and Peltier stated they were coming in <br />with a PUD. <br />Rubenzer pointed out an area shown on the plan to be an open area. Kassen said the area was a swamp <br />and that there is a beaver dam in that area which all floods out. <br />Dave Holm, 6460 125th St., reiterated what others said, and handed out a letter to the Planning <br />Commission from Shane Krey, 6640 125th St., since he could not attend the meeting. <br />Kurt Melancon, 6480 125th St. N., referred to a survey/questionnaire the City had sent to all residents, <br />regarding open spaces. He feels new neighbors should abide by the 10 acre minimum lot requirement. <br />Kevin Peltier, 13094 Goodview Ave., had concerns regarding drainage and felt there should be a complete <br />stormwater drainage plan submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />