Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Planning Commission November 18, 1998 - Page 4 <br />Special Use Permit-Bernin Tree Farm <br />The Planning Commission considered the request of Bruce A. Bernin, 6540 Greene Avenue N., for <br />renewal of his special use permit to operate Bernin's Tree Farm and display four advertising signs. The <br />"choose & cut" Christmas tree farm would operate from the day after Thanksgiving through December <br />24th. The property is generally located on the south end of Oneka Lake and legally described as <br />Government Lot 5, Sec. 16, T3 IN, R21W. <br />Schumann read the public notice. <br />Peltier opened the meeting for public comment but there was none. <br />Pelter asked how long Bernin had been selling trees and was told by Mr. Bernin this was his ninth year <br />Puleo, referring to the permit granted in 1990, asked if the day after Thanksgiving was early enough to <br />begin tree sales, and if the hours would remain the same. Bernin felt it was early enough, and he intended <br />to keep the same hours as in the past. Puleo also asked if all the trees were grown on his property or if <br />some were brought in, and was told that approximately 50 trees are brought in each year. <br />Puleo made motion, Peltier seconded, to recommend approval of a special use permit for "Choose and <br />Cut" Christmas tree sales with the following conditions: <br />1. Permit to be renewed until the year 2008. <br />2. The allowed starting date for the sale of trees be changed from November 23 to the day after <br />Thanksgiving. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />Land Use Regulations hearing <br />Chairperson Peltier reconvened the meeting of November 14, 1998, to allow more time for public <br />comment. <br />Ron Cressman, 6085 165th St. N., expressed concern regarding the change in the zoning of his <br />neighborhood, the southeast corner of Highway 61 and 165th St., from residential to commercial, stating <br />that the proposed ordinance would not allow them to rebuild should their homes be destroyed by fire. <br />Mr. Waller, 14010 Homestead Ave. N., would like his ten acres to remain agricultural instead of the <br />proposed rural residential. <br />Beth Miner, 8131 140th St. N, would like her 85 acres to remain zoned agricultural instead of the <br />proposed rural residential. Approximately 30 acres of it is in pasture, which she rotates and seeds on a <br />regular basis. <br />Dean Stedt, 7416 132nd St. N., raises cattle on his 43.5 acres, and feels changing his property from <br />agricultural to residential would put unnecessary restrictions on his property regarding vehicles and <br />storage requirements. <br />Jeffrey Gruett, 7285 137th St. N., feels rezoning from agricultural to residential would take away his <br />vehicle and barn freedom. He would like to see everything north of 132nd Street remain agricultural. <br />Jerome Jessen, 7475 132nd St. N., who owns a dump truck that he operates in a business, feels that the <br />vehicle requirements in the proposed rural residential zone would impose a hardship. <br />Cathy Scobie, 7676 120th St. N., questioned section 3 of the zoning ordinance, stating there is no <br />provision regarding co-op farming, and people acquiring land in the area would not be grandfathered in. <br />She would like to see Section 6-13, Cluster Housing, I(2) to read active or potential where referring to the <br />preservation of agricultural operations on 20 or more acres and 1(3) to include wetlands and open area as <br />well as forested areas to be preserved from development by a permanent conservation easement. Scobie <br />