My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1991.06.26 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1991 PC Minutes
>
1991.06.26 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2015 11:38:50 AM
Creation date
2/25/2015 8:34:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
6/26/1991
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes - June 26, 1991 <br />Page 8 <br />Commissioners Peltier and Oswald were extremely concerned that there was <br />not adequate ponding and drainage for the proposed development. While <br />Commissioners Thoreson and Henry felt this was an appropriate area for <br />development and were satisfied that the property could be developed with <br />satisfactory water storage on site. <br />Motion made by Oswald, seconded by Peltier to recommend denial of the <br />request of Richard Sagstetter and Richard Schreier/Arlington Properties to <br />subdivide 45.02 acres into 98 residential lots as described above, based <br />on the developers refusal to accept tabling this issue until the City can <br />get answers to the questions raised tonight and in the City Engineers <br />report. <br />AYE: Peltier, Oswald <br />NAY: Henry, Thoreson <br />Motion failed. <br />Motion made by Henry, seconded by Thoreson to recommend approval of the- <br />request <br />herequest of Sagstetter/Schreier/Arlington Properties to subdivide 45.02 <br />acres into 98 residential lots subject to the following 21 conditions: <br />1. The final plat must be recorded with Washington County within 60 days <br />of plat approval or said action shall be null and void. <br />2. Final plat approval shall be contingent upon compliance with grading, <br />storm water drainage, and utility plan approval by the city engineer' <br />3. All applicable conditions of plat approval must be met prior to the <br />recording of the final plat at the Washington County Recorder's <br />Office. <br />4. The property lines identified on the plat must be identified by the <br />applicants to assure proper setbacks when buildings are to be <br />constructed if required by the building inspector. <br />5. No building or other permits shall be issued until the final plat has <br />been recorded with Washington County, and utility/road improvements <br />are substantially completed (see developer's agreement). <br />6. The required permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District and DNR <br />must be approved and submitted to the City prior to approval of the <br />final plat. <br />7. All fees relating to this subdivision shall be paid by the applicant <br />including the cost of recording documents with Washington County. <br />B. Payment of the required fee in lieu of parkland dedication shall be <br />made prior to signing of the final plat. <br />9. Installation of required roadways, including streets, curb and gutter, <br />stormwater control, and utilities shall be at the developers expense <br />as per the developers agreement and approved plans. <br />10. Plat approval shall be contingent upon full compliance with the <br />developer's agreement. <br />11. No improvements, landscaping, or grading shall be permitted in defined <br />drainage areas without the express written authorization of the City <br />and the approved watershed district. <br />12. All property owners shall be held responsible for maintenance of <br />drainage areas within the easements on their property and deed <br />restrictions shall limit activities permitted in these drainage areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.