1990.05.23 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

P.C. Minutes - May 23, 1990 Page 4 north of 125th St., approximately 300 ft. east of Fiona Rd. The tract of land in question is not within the Municipal Urban Service Area but does meet the minimum 5 acre requirement outside the MUSA area. From a long range planning standpoint it would probably be more appropriate to address the zoning of the entire 79 acre tract of land in question, however, the request before you does appear to be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan and previous council policy regarding five acre tracts of land outside the MUSA. After a brief discussion the planning commission concurred that this request was consistent with the comprehensive plan and could see no objections to the rezoning. Motion made by Senkler, seconded by Barnes to recommend approval of the request of Mabel Hauble to rezone a five acre tract of land from Agricultural to RR2 (five acre Minimum) described as follows: The south 419.21 feet of the east 520 feet of the west 841.47 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4, Section 32, T31N, R21W, Washington County. Subject to 125th St. North along the south line. All aye, motion passed. Subdivision Reouest (Mabel Hauble) Mabel Hauble, Gerald Hauble, and Donald Hauble have made application to the City of Hugo for a minor subdivision and waiver of the formal platting requirements for a tract of land identified as the south 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 31 north, Range 21 west, Washington County, Minnesota. It is the intent of the applicants to subdivide the property in question into three parcels by certificate of survey. Parcel A consists of 46.3 acres, Parcel B, 5 acres, and Parcel C, 21.1 acres. There are currently residences located on Parcel A and Parcel B, and Mr. Donald Hauble has indicated that he will be applying for building permits to construct a residence on Parcel C. All three parcels in question have direct access to 125th St. No. All sites in question meet dimension requirements if Parcel B is rezoned as requested. The lot sizes have been determined so as to accommodate the possible further subdivision of Parcels A and C in the future. The applicants have been informed that any further subdivision of the site will require formal platting. If the planning commission feels this request is consistent with the comprehensive plan regarding minor subdivisions, we suggest that any recommendation for survey approval and waiver of formal platting requirements be subject to special conditions. The planning commission was concerned that the driveway to Parcel A crosses Parcel B and felt that a private driveway easement should be provided but preferably the driveway should be relocated onto Parcel B. Motion made by Barnes, seconded by Mezzano to recommend approval of the request of Mabel Hauble to subdivide approximately 79.4 acres into three parcels identified as; the south half of the northwest 1/4, Section 32, T341N, R21W, subject to the following special conditions.