Laserfiche WebLink
June 1990 <br />[he regular meeting was called to order by Chairman Senkler ai <br />PRESENT: Henry, Thoreson, Oswald, Senkler, Administrator Huber <br />Carole LaBelle ` <br />ABSENT: Barnes <br />Motion made by Thoreson, seconded by Henry to approve the minutes o f th <br />May 2S, 1990 meeting as amended. e <br />All aye, motion passed. <br />Motion made by Henry, seconded by Senkler to approve the minutes of J <br />1*1 1990 meeting as amended, une <br />MINOR SUBDIVISION (ED ) <br />Chairman Senkler requested Administrator Huber review this <br />the planning commission. Mr. Huber stated that Mr. Ed W request with <br />application to the City of Hugo for a minor subdivision i Waugh has made <br />formal platting requirements to subdivide a 9.45 �s on an� waiver of the <br />two lots. The property in question is zoned ^B acre tract of land into <br />southeast corner of Highway 61 and County Rd.'�BAandTis located at the <br />the subdivision is to accommodate the sale oa ^ �e primary purpose of <br />the construction of a Tom Thumb Superette with two acre tract of land for <br />a car wash. This development is subject t r gas pumping facilities and <br />The minor subdivision proposed is affected <br />use Permit review. <br />constr�ints: e Y the following physical <br />I. County Rd. 8A on the north. <br />2. Trunk Highway 61 on the west. <br />3. A major drainage area and flood plain on the east. <br />The <br />drainage easement on site has been identified as per request of th <br />Ricerequested that <br />District. The Washington County Highway Departmente <br />"asriequesfed that the City require the dedication of an additional 7t <br />Of gnr_o -way on County Rd. 8A to help accommodate improvement t tree <br />roadwayinthetfuture. The county needs a total of 80 ft of rishtoof��s <br />and currently here is 66 ft- of right-of-way in this area. <br />Th y - -way <br />question appears to meet most of technical requirements of the The survey in <br />City— <br />ordinance with the exception that approval of this ` s <br />landlocked parcel of land owned by Mr. Ed Waugh survey would create a <br />question as identified on the - aug south of the site in <br />ProPerty is attached to and becomes a part of Tract B so that said tract <br />The attorney ƒ roadway, we could not recommend approval of <br />this survey, addition rney or the developer has indicated he will be <br />problem Wh on <br />g on of this landlocked parcel to Tract B to resolve thi <br />the it, e ave notified the developer that any future subdivision f s <br />this, <br />reewou/d require formal platting' If the Planning Commission <br />that quesr is consistent with <br />be sub�ect <br />the coeprehensive plan we wo ld '' <br />a said ,ecommendation to specjal conditi'ns' usugJest <br />