Laserfiche WebLink
Idministrative Inter Schmeling reviewed this request with the planning <br />commission. He stated that Mr. Dan Santanni, 1019 W. Sherren St., <br />Roseville, has applied to the City of Hugo for an amended Special Use <br />Permit to construct a 50' X 81' accessory storage building instead of the <br />originally proposed 54' X 40' accessory storage building and requests the <br />waiver of conditions 1, 5, 6, 7 of the previous special use permit <br />approved on 10-6-89 by the city council. This tract is located north of <br />125th St. and east of Goodview Ave. (aka 7124 125th St.). The parcel is <br />zoned agriculture and is 80 acres in size. The property is legally <br />described as the east 1/2 of the northeast 1/4, Section 33, T31N, R21W, <br />Washington County. The city staff sees no problem with the larger <br />building but would question the desirability of eliminating the special <br />conditions of the previous permit. <br />Chairman Senkler requested comments from the public. Mr. Santanni stated <br />that he felt conditions 1, 5, 6, 7 were unreasonable and an infringement <br />of his constitutional rights. Mrs. Santanni was present and informed the <br />commission that her husband has a hearing problem and that contributes to <br />his confusion and misunderstanding of the issues. Mr. Santanni stated he <br />would welcome any representative from the City of Hugo at anytime to his <br />accessory building but does not feel the condition mandating it is <br />necessary. A majority of the commission members concurred that requiring <br />a building permit on an agricultural building was unnecessary if the <br />building is used solely for agricultural purposes. Administrator Huber <br />attended the meeting briefly and informed the commission that the building <br />zermit condition could be eliminated if the use is solely for farming <br />purposes. Several members also agreed that most farm operations do store <br />machinery outside and to forbid Mr. Santanni from doing so would be <br />unreasonable. <br />After a lengthy discussion and in a motion by Henry, seconded by Barnes <br />the commission recommended approval of the amended special use permit <br />request of Dan Santanni to construct a 50' X 81' accessory storage <br />building for storing his crops, grains, and farm machinery subject to the <br />conditions of his original permit with the following revisions: <br />1. Shall be deleted <br />5. If the owner initiates any action to subdivide all or a portion of the <br />80 acre site described, he shall be required to post a $3,000 letter <br />of credit with the City, assuring that a residential structure will be <br />constructed on the site where the proposed building will exist. Said <br />construction will take place within three (3) years of the submitted <br />letter of creditor the deposit forfieted. <br />6. No exterior storage of equipment or materials other than for farming <br />purposes shall be permitted on site. <br />7. Representatives of the City be allowed access to the site at <br />reasonable times to assure compliance with this permit. <br />Members voting Aye: Mezzano, Henry, Thoreson, Barnes <br />Members voting Nay: Senkler <br />Motion passed. <br />P.C. Minutes 11-21-89 3 <br />