Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes - February 24, 1988 <br />Page 4 <br />18. Developer shall deposit with the City a certified check in an amount <br />to cover initial costs incurred by the city for engineering review, <br />legal review, and administration of this request. The developer shall <br />pay any costs incurred and the city shall reimburse the developer any <br />remaining funds to cover staff review ($10,000 recommended amount). <br />19. A copy of all as -built drawings for utility installation must be <br />recorded within 30 days of construction completion with the city <br />clerk. <br />20. Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred for engineering <br />inspection during the course of utility and roadway construction. <br />21. Restrictive covenants shall address maintenance and activities in the <br />protected wetlands that extend onto the state recognized wetlands <br />area. Restrictive covenants shall also prohibit the construction of <br />fences, buildings, or other vegetation in easements or wetlands. <br />22. Developer shall install one tree of a minimal size within the <br />subdivision development as per subdivision regulations. <br />23. Approved driveways or drainage ways must include the installation of a <br />minimum 15" diameter corrugated metal culvert in a manner acceptable <br />to the City. <br />24. All applicable conditions of the preliminary plat and development <br />agreement must be met prior to approval of the final plat by the City <br />Council. <br />25. No significant deviations from the approved preliminary plat shall be <br />made unless reviewed by the Planning Commission. <br />26. Developer shall be responsible for the improvement and completion of <br />the ditch system, at the time of utility installation unless an <br />underground system is installed. <br />27. Developer shall be responsible for obtaining a traffic count on <br />existing roads to determine whether the proposed and existing road <br />can handle the additional traffic anticipated. <br />All voting aye, motion passed. <br />Rezoning Re UeSt (Keystone BUilders/Arcand) <br />Chairman Sent. -:ler opened the public hearing and requested taht the City <br />administrator review the background of the request before the commission. <br />Mr. Huber stated the Ms. Irene Arcand and Keystone Builders Corp. have <br />made application to the City of Hugo for the rezoning of 160 acres from <br />Agricultural to RR1 Residential. The property in question is described as <br />the easterly 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 33, T31N, R21W, and the <br />western 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 34, T31N, R21W, and <br />approximately 2.13 acres owned by Irene Arcand lying north, northwest of <br />County Rd. 10 in the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 5, T30, <br />R21. The property abutts 125th St. on the north and County State Aid <br />Highway 10 on the south. Agricultural zones require a minimum 10 acre lot <br />size while the developers are requesting the minimum lot size be 3 acres. <br />The applicant is proposing this rezoning with the intent to subdivide <br />(into approximately 45 building sites) and construct homes in a price <br />range of $200,000 to $400,000. The applicant has entered into a purchase <br />agreement to buy the 160 acres in question if the property is rezoned. <br />The developer has indicated that they intend to develop the land taking <br />into account the wooded areas and lowlands as valuable asthetic features <br />of the site. The property in question abutts Grant Township to the south <br />