Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes - April 5, 1988 <br />Page 5 <br />5. All fees relating to this subdivision approval shall be paid by the <br />applicant including the cost of recording documents with Washington <br />C(:)t_tn ty . <br />b. On site activities permitted as a result of this Subdivision shall not <br />cause the altering of any watercourse, ditch, or drainage system .in <br />this area. <br />Residences built on this site must be located in the proximity of the <br />soil test area or additional soil tests will be required prior to <br />i. :seance of a building permit. <br />8. All parkland dedication fees shall be paid prior to approval of the <br />final survey. <br />9. No filling of any of the wetlands identified on parcels 2 and ' shall <br />be permitted without first securing approval from the Dept. of Natural <br />Resources, Division of Waters. <br />10. The access identified on parcel 3 of the survey should be approved by <br />the DNR prior to final survey approval. <br />11. Any further subdivision of this property or adjacent properties owned <br />by Mr. Schuneman or subsequent owners shall be done by formal <br />platting. <br />12. Any easements required by the DNR or Rice Creek Watershed D:i.str.ict for <br />the wetlands area on site shall be granted by applicant to the <br />appropriate agency as requested. <br />1:':. The applicant shall dedicate to the city for roadway purposes <br />.identified right-of-way for 125th St. noted on sheet one, bottom of <br />page. <br />14. Applicant shall comply with all requests and recommendations of the <br />Rice Creek. Watershed District. <br />All aye, motion passed. <br />Re onig.l~!_...RF.gk..te�st:•_...__(Fred Mac:a1us Jr. } <br />Administrator informed the commission members that Mr. Fred Macalus has <br />made application to the City of Hugo for the rezoning of a 42 acre tract <br />of land from conservancy to agricultural. The property in question is <br />generally described as the east 638 f t . of the northeast quarter of the <br />northwest quarter of section 5, T31N, R21W, Washington County, Minnesota, <br />except the north 11373 ft. thereof and other easements. The property <br />abutts an agricultural zone to the north and to the south. The zones to <br />the east and west are both conservancy. It is our understanding that the <br />applicant ultimately intends to subdivide the property in question into <br />three tracts for development purposes. The question before the commission <br />at this hearing is whether or not an agricultural zone is appropriate in <br />this area. if a rezoning is approved by the city the subdivision of land <br />and other pertinent issues regarding development of this property would be <br />reviewed during the subdivision process. <br />Mr. Macalus was not present to comment on his behalf or answer questions <br />regarding this rezoning. Several area residents opposed the rezoning <br />stating that Foxhill Ave. would not support additional traffic and the <br />property in question could not adequately support additional septic <br />systems. Leo McEvoy stated that the surrounding area already has five <br />acre lots in a conservancy zone and the septic systems are too <br />concentrated. Chairman Senkler stated that the rezoning <br />