My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1988.09.23 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1988 PC Minutes
>
1988.09.23 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2015 9:42:21 AM
Creation date
2/25/2015 11:17:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/23/1988
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P.C. Minutes - 9-23-88 <br />page 2 <br />would the properties adjacent to 125th St. be assessed when road <br />improvements are installed. Mr. Huber informed Ms. Scobie that the <br />homesites indicated on the plat are approximate and could be altered <br />slightly and that any property benefitting from road improvements on 125th <br />could be assessed. Mr. Jerry Mogren owner of the property directly west <br />of the development felt there should be type of easement to insure access <br />to his property. It was the general concensus that the proposed roads <br />running through the development would provide good access and no <br />additional easement or access should be required of Keystone Builders. <br />Administrator Huber stated that because the Bald Eagle Sportsmans Assoc. <br />is in close proximity to the proposed development all potential buyers <br />should be informed of the location of the gun club either by restrictive <br />covenants, deed, or however appropriate. Mr. Sondrall agreed that <br />potential buyers would be notified. <br />Motion made by Barnes, second by Sullivan to recommend approval of the <br />Dellwood Ridge Subdivision subject to the following conditions: <br />1. Preliminary plat be submitted to the city council within 90 days of <br />the commissions recommendation and that the revised plat incorporate <br />the recommendations of the RCWD and other governmental agencies. <br />2. The preliminary plat will not be submitted to the council until all <br />engineering, legal, and staff recommendations have been incorporated <br />into the plat. <br />3. All fees relating to the subidivision shall be paid by the applicant <br />inlcuding the cost of recording the documents with Washington County., <br />4. Developers secure any required road access permits from Washington <br />County for access to County State Aid Highway 10. <br />5. The developer pay fee in lieu of parkland dedication at the time of <br />final plat approval. <br />6. All improvements must be installed as per city design requirements and <br />the cost of all improvements be borne by the developer. <br />7. The interior roadway system become a part of the city system but must <br />be maintained by the devloper until all improvements are complete and <br />accepted by the city. <br />G. Stormwater holding ponds and ditches must be approved by the <br />appropriate watershed district and maintained by the property owner <br />with a method of maintenance to be reviewed by the city engineer. <br />9. The internal roadway system shall be of bituminous surfacing with the <br />installation of curb and gutter and approved stormwater drainage. <br />10. Street lighting shall be installed be NSP at the developers expense. <br />11. All interior street signs shall be paid for by the developers. <br />12. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the United States Postal <br />Service. <br />13. All lots abutting on 125th St. shall be subject to assessments <br />relating to the improvement of said roadway in the future. <br />14. The developer shall deposit with the city a certified check in an <br />amount to cover initial costs incurred by the city for engineering, <br />legal review and admininstration of this request. The developer shall <br />pay any cost incurred and the city shall reimburse the developer any <br />remaining funds to cover staff review ($10,000 recommended amount). <br />15. A copy of all road design documents shall be submitted to the city <br />engineer for review and a copy placed on file with the city clerk. <br />16. The developer shall reimburse the city for any costs incurred for <br />engineering inspection during the course of roadway construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.