1980.08.27 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Hugo Planning Commission August 27, 1980 Page 2 of 3 Mrs. Hill - cont. Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Peltier, that at the applicant's request, the application for Special Use Permit be tabled until Mrs. Hill requests to be placed on the agenda. Let the record show she has stated her intent to ask the City Council for an extension of the 90 day liquor license priority assigned to her. All aye. Motion Carried Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Houle, requesting the City Attorney to advise as to whether a parking lot adjacent to an On Sale liquor establishment, that the applicant is not the fee owner and is a separate parcel of land, will meet the requirements for the number of parking spaces in the CB zone. Mr. Johnson to respond in writing prior to the next meeting (9/10/80) and to provide Mrs. Hill with a copy of his response. All aye. Motion Carried. THOMAS CLARK - CHANGE IN PROPERTY LINES Because of an error in a 1966 survey, Mr. Clark will be required to take 14' from Parcel C and add to Parcel A. Otherwise, Mr. Day's driveway would not be located on his property. A Minor Subdivision was granted to Mr. Clark on April 7, 1980, but no deeds could be recorded. • Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Greger, to add Mr. Clark to the agenda for all purposes. All aye. Motion Carried. Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Lorch, that the Planning Commission forward the Certificate of Survey, and call the Council's attention to the original appli- cation and their subsequent action, taking note of the difference in the current survey versus the applicant's original request. We recommend the Council take note of an additional 14' to be added to Parcel A from Parcel C. We recommend they approve the change and direct the City Clerk to stamp the deeds. Let the record show that nothing has been recorded at Washington County at this point. All aye. Motion Carried. CARL SCHUNEMAN - DIVISION OF 50 ACRES Mr. Schuneman was present, and stated that there is a dedicated cartway f mile from Goodview that goes to his property. He would like to upgrade that cartway along with an additional 2 mile to the 4 section line. The cartway has never been vacated, and has not been maintained by the city. Mr. Clifford Axelson has verbally agreed to grant a 33' across his property to obtain the necessary footage. If the city agrees to the upgarding of the cartway, then a Land Division would be required (five 10 acres lots). If cartway is considered a new road, a Major Subdivision would be needed. Mr. Schuneman provided perc tests for the 5 parcels, and stated that drainage easements should also be required. A temporary cul-de-sac would be located