Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo Planning Commission. <br />January 12, 1977 <br />Page 2 of <br />T -lotion :rade by Gillen, seconded by T-cAllister, that we first ask <br />assistance from the planners that there is a need for this type of <br />zoning. Should it be so determined, matter to be p:rsued through <br />a Public Isearing. <br />Voting for: Ehret, Peltier, Peloquin, Greger, Gillen, and T-;cAllister. <br />i"otion carried. <br />Ehret made motior_, seconded by Peltier, to amend the motion that we <br />request the City Council for their origirlal intent on the request to <br />create a commercial -recreational zone and whether or not their intent <br />still stands today, and further if they would like this body to in- <br />vestir;ate the creation of such a zone. <br />Votin,�.; for: Ehret, Peltier, Peloquin, Greger, Gillen, and McAllister. <br />JIT" 3REVIG - REZCYING <br />P,Ir. 3revig has not been able to have arty pert tests done because of; <br />the weather. Mr. Gillen discussed the possibility of deleting the <br />request of Navin`; to take a pert test for the driveway. Gillen stated <br />it was not a normal request, and could incur additional costs. <br />',:r. 3revig has not been able to resolve the problem of the dike on his <br />property. Has turned matter over to an attorne�r. Peloqui.- stated <br />that the City Council would take care of the matter this sprii". <br />Chairman hret stated that 3revig's rezoning request does not meet <br />with current requirer^e.^ts of the zoning ordinance. Ehret told <br />Brevig that it might be a good idea to withdraw the applicatio>> until <br />the dike problem is settled. 3revig stated he was having trouble <br />locating a�,Iy information at City Ilall in- re:;;ands to _,vergreer_ ;rl. <br />T- cAllister volunteered to assist T• -r. Brevis; in locating information. <br />�4otio^ rade by Greer, seconded by Peloquin, to postpone the consi- <br />deration of the application until w-aI:e no changes to the <br />request rade at the meetin`T of October 27,�1�7 <br />Greger with,,- ew motion. <br />".7otior rade by Greger, seconded by Peltier, that we postpone request <br />until the second meeting in June (June 22, 1977). <br />Voting; for: 3hret, Peltier, Greger, Giller, and McAllister. <br />.Abstained: Peloqui^ <br />TJotioj,j Carried. <br />I- otion made by Gill.eri, seconded by ;.`cAllister, to ame rd to read we <br />delete any requirements for pert tests and soil borings for the <br />proposed driveway. <br />Voting for: Ehret, Peltier, Gillen, and r'cA).lister <br />lbsta.ined : Peloquin <br />:Totijig ':�:,ai est: Greger. <br />°o tion-. carried. <br />