My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1978.06.14 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1978 PC Minutes
>
1978.06.14 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2015 4:36:21 PM
Creation date
2/27/2015 12:50:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
6/14/1978
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS <br />OF THE <br />HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />June 14, 1978 <br />The meeting was called to order by Chairman Larry Ehret at 8:02 PM. <br />PRESENT: Ehret, Peloquin, Peltier, Woeltge, and McAllister <br />ABSENT: Greger and Gillen <br />Motion made by Peltier, seconded by McAllister, to approve the minutes of May 24, 1978, <br />as presented. <br />All.aye. Motion Carried. <br />GREGER ARRIVED AT 8:03 PM, <br />DICK GENRICH - VARIANCE <br />Mr. Genrich is acting as the agent for the estate of William Schletty. Theyare <br />requesting approval of access by private driveway and variance from the -mi ur-road <br />frontage requirement _ - }-so as to obtain a building permit for the <br />50A site. There is a 30A parcel that fronts 130th Street with 400' frontage. The <br />land is zoned Conservancy. (GTLLEN ARRIVED AT 8:06 PM). The 66' easement would serve <br />a l0A and 50 or 55A parcel. The perc tests provided by Mr. Genrich were reviewed by <br />Dan Koehler, and it was his determination that they were unacceptable. Peltier <br />stated that there are two ditches on the property that have to be kept open, and one <br />may be a judicial ditch. Ehret said that if there was a judicial ditch on the pro- <br />perty, a permit would have to be obtained from Rice Creek Watershe. The private <br />ditch would just need a culvert. He suggested that Mr. Genrich get a better perc test <br />for the two parcels of land, and contact Rice Creek for the possibility of obtaining <br />a permit for the ditch. Other than that, the Planning Commission had no problem with <br />the granting a variance for the 66' easement as frontage. <br />Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Peloquin, to recommend approval of the variance <br />request as applied for by Mr. William Genri6h, for a 66' easement as frontage on <br />Goodview Avenue, subject to the following: <br />1. Proof of buildable lot sites. <br />2. Determination of location of any judicial ditches. <br />3. If a judicial ditch does exist, a valid permit from Rice Creek Watershed. <br />4. That the private easement is to serve the 50 or 55A lot and the 10A parcel lying <br />on the northwest corner of the easement. <br />VOTING FOR: Peloquin, Gillen, Greger, 1doeltge, McAllister, and Ehret <br />ABSTAINED: Peltier <br />Motion Carried. <br />Let the record show that the Planning Commission would like to again review the request <br />after the required material requested is provided. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.