My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1978.05.10 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1978 PC Minutes
>
1978.05.10 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2015 4:36:02 PM
Creation date
2/27/2015 12:53:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
5/10/1978
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lugo Planning Conmission <br />Vay 10, 1973 <br />11 <br />Page 2. of 4 <br />IP?FORT''11TIOTT R`G^ RD!YG '•TIC T Y1,1 <br />T r. CTranFer was present, and stated that his property on 16r -+h Street <br />had ti•.o logal descriptions, but was recorded on one deed. The two <br />pieces of property are 4.4 ,1. and 4.2A in the Conservancy zone. The <br />land had been spli i, and recorded on Dece??ber 20, 1971, prior to Hugro's <br />adoption o`' the Zoning Ordinance. <br />'`otion = ade by "c.alister, seconded by Pcltier, to recommend approval. <br />of the obtaining o' separate deeds for Tract A & P as described by the <br />Corti 'Ji cate of Survey, and authorise tF?e Clity Clerk to sign. Land <br />was divided by survey prior to the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />:_11. aye. .ot-ion Carried. <br />!.I r . Granger also inquired if he could divide his lend behind the <br />plumbing shop and meet the SFU zoning requirements. The Planning <br />COMP?ission could see no problem with his request. <br />.'1ITH T--I'PR <br />c — PROPOSED OSED I,AND DIVISIM. <br />Po renresentative at the meeting. <br />_�T D DIVJSION <br />Nr. 131ac'lbi.rd, TPorth-1.ortheast realty, was present, and he is requesting <br />to divide 12. into 4 parcels. The division neets all. -requirements of <br />the citir's ordinance. <br />Totion rade by "Peltier, seconded by Peloquin, to recommend approval <br />of the land division as submitted. to divide 426. into four parcels. <br />'Lequested by '"r. Ray Feeser, land o rer. <br />VO'"IT?G FOR: Peloquin, Peltier, Gillen, `:;oeltge, .T•. cAllister, and Ehret <br />T*"otion Carried. <br />The P1 amino Commission requested that the following note be addressed <br />to the City Council: <br />The lanr_ing Commission feels that if a land division comes in that <br />:?leets all the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, that it should, <br />therefore, be possible for the City Clerk- to stamp that land division <br />wither the approval of the City Council. -Je respectfully ask for <br />clarification from the City Council, either yes or no, for the informa— <br />tion of the Planning Commission and the City Clerk. <br />C ^'??: "..E — T,AND PIS 11MING QCT <br />I Dale :ras present to further cl ori fy how the rioney is to be spent <br />that has been granted to Hugo via. a grant from T'etro Council. The <br />T°etro Council has required that the city submit a comprehensive plan <br />as if one had neve: been previously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.