1976.06.09 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Tune 9, 1976 Page 3 of 10 Planning Commission go take a look. It is not properly done. For the record, I would like to point out that the item of the fence declares that the fence should be constructed in an orderly manner on the property line. Please take a look at that fence. Near the north boundary line, itis almost ridiculous to call this a proper fence. Take a good look at it. James Smith: First of all, you may have a document from the City 13560 Homestead— Attorney; he has indicated to me that you cannot essen— tially hear on only part of the permit. I think this should be clarified. Regarding No. 22, I think this should be cleared up. Spitzer read excerpts of letter from City Attorney, dated May 18, 1976, as follows: "In view of the foregoing considerations of the actions of the Hugo City Council, it would appear that the 'dlite Bear Rod & Gun Club has consistently been directed to re—apply for a special use permit with the concern being directed at item No. 2 of the originally issued special use permit." Quoting another excerpt from the same letter, "In the City 6ouncil meeting; of May 3, 1976, there was a motion to delete the last six words of the just ouoted motion, as reflected in the Minutes, and the motion was adopted with Lease, Schletty and Smith voting in favor and Leroux against". Spitzer: After removing the last six words of the motion, it reads,"Lease made motion, Smith seconded to accept the opinion of the City Attorney and notify the White Bear Rod and Gun Club to apply for a new Special Use Per— mit to re—nog btiate item #2 only." Smith: I don't think this is the issue. It is null and void in it's entirety. He is saying the whole permit is null and void and has indicated to the Planning Commission that you should consider'dnly Item #2. Steve Toensing: Ivir. Schletty said the trees weren't planted far enough and 14020 Hyde not enough of them. The variance is requested now instead of before they were planted and I don't feel they should be granted this permit. Harold Bramstedtt Do I understand that the City Council and everyone 6343 145th St.N. is satisfied with compliance with the rest of the items of the permit? Spitzer: It is my understanding. Bramstedt: What about the 74 decibils? Six or seven times I have re— ported violations of this nature to the Hugo Police Department. They are allowed forty decibils. I have records of this — tape after tape, showing violation. I don't think anyone has checked on this. Has anyone checked? Spitzer: This was checked before the issuance of the original Special Use Permit. Schletty: I would like to clarify this matter. They originally said they wouldn't cut any trees. !.,.Then the tests were made, the terrain was the same as it was in the beginning. After that, they cut trees higher than 8f high off — some of the trees were 40 or 50' tall. The tests taken originally don't qualify any lonjzer by no means. This is the reason we