1976.07.28 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting July 28, 1976 Page 3 of 5 George Jungblut - Sketch Plan Mr. Jungblut appeared with developer Roy Stanley with a sketch plan for his proposed development on the northeast end of Bald Eagle Lake. Pro- posal shows twenty acres divided into 16 one acre, or larger homesites. The land is presently zoned Single Family Estates. Two new streets are proposed - Mr. Jungblut explained the Sanitary Sewer line is 1/4 mile away - he proposes on-site sewage systems - has not yet taken perc tests. Spitzer explained a 60' wide road would be required and most likely would have to be blacktopped. Peloquin felt it would be difficult to get City Council approval without public sewers. Spitzer said if he meets minimum lot size requirements and has acceptable perc tests, that it should be acceptable. Peloquin suggested to Jungblut that he check with the City Engineer regarding the availability of city sewer before he proceeds too *such further. Spitzer explained that there would be need for park land dedication and that usually the city preferred cash in lieu of -land but Greger pointed out that it isn't everyday that the City gets an opror- tunity to acquire lakeshore. Spitzer agreed - mentioned that the policy has been to ask for either 7% of the vp lue of the undeveloped land or 100 of the land. Spitzer suggested discussing the rossibility of accept- ing land instead of money with the City Council ^nd the W-shington County Planner. Peloquin made motion, seconded by Peltier, to accept the Jungblut sketch plan with the exception of the width of the north street, which must be widened to 601, =nd subject to dividing lot #10 among the two adjacent properties; careful consideration is to be given to the entrance of the north -south street on the south end. all aye. Motion carried. Secretary advised to forward one copy of sketch plan to City Engineer. Planning Commission to discuss matter with Washington County Flanning Consultant. applicant advised to reappear at the August 11th meeting. Burdick - Special Use Permit Upon the arrival of Dennis Burdick, Ehret made motion, seconded by Peltier, to rescind the previous Burdick motion. All aye. Motion carried. Chairman Spitzer read County Planning Consultant's recommendations regard- ing the Burdick Site Plan. Spitzer pointed out that the drawing contained no provisions for signs. Burdick advised to discuss matter of sign ord finance with Building Inspector. Burdick agreed to Schwab's recommendations except for requirement to park 12' from the sidewalk - said his plans were to park 12" from the sidewalk. The parking of cars in the front of the building was discussed.- Burdick informed he could not cross the sidewalk to park cp.rs in any place that isn't a driveway. Peltier said she thinks the cars are parked too close to the sidewalk. Thinks they should be at least three feet away from the sidewalk. Burdick told to reappear on August 11th and to provide a new plan that shows the driveway, distance from property lines, show approximately where front of Post Cffice is and width of street and also possibility of putting rock, or similiar decoration so teat distance between sidewalk and parked cars is clearly defined. Burdick should also show location of signs.