1976.08.11 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commis sion Meeting August 11, 1976 Page 2 of 7 George Jun,,7blut - Preliminary Plat ',pproval Pan Spitzer mentioned that at the _last meeting Tir. Junblut and Tulevcloper Roy Stanley appeared with a s',etch pl a-, and the following changes ..,,ere recommended by the Planning Commission: 1) division of hot ;'r'10, a lot which does hot meet the City's minimus. lot size requirement, between the two adjacent prop- erties. 2) Appropriate handling of the entrance to the north -south street or. th ; south end of the proposed project. 3) ;Tiwening of the north street to 60 feet. Spitzer also mentioned the parkland dedication requirement, -stating that although the City usually takes a dim view of accepting parkland, and usually instead grants a ronetary consideration, in this particular case, Spitzer has discussed the matter with the City Council, and it is the general consensus of the Council that it would be more advantageous to the City to accept lend, and more specifically hot f16, which would become a City ozaned lake access, and all expenses for upgrading of such access would become the burde-^ of the City. Spitzer mentioned the matter of the nearness of the Sanitary Sewer. Jungblut explained he thought Spitzer was going; to check with the City engineer regarding the necessity of applying for the extension of the sewer to the Jungblut property. JunEblut's request is for on-site sewage systems. Jung' e_cplained no pert tests have been done yet. Jungblut asked if a variance could be granted for gravel streets. Spitzer ex- plai,ied that the City Ordinance calls for blacktopped streets u:iless the lots in question are .four acres or larger. Jungblut asked if the streets have to be built before any lots are sold - Spitzer said no, a bond could be posted instead. r 32' finished road surface would be required, with a si_rt-.* soot right of way. Jun blut said donating Lot #16 to the City, plus the blacktop requirement would make the costs excessive. Spitzer said the blacktopping would definitely be required, parkland dedication of Lot --','l" would most likely be required but the matter - of division of Lot 'lo could be argued. Developer Stanley and JunTblut would like to study the matter to see if still economically feasible wit. these require - ..encs. Totion made by Peltier, seconded by Peloquin, to table the matter of the Jungblut preliminary plat approval .for the proposed development on the northeast end of Bald Eagle Lake indefinitely. All aye. 1 -lotion carried. Dennis Durdic', - SpeeAal Use Permit =3urc ie'c apncared with Site Plan. explained at this time doesn't _know what they want to do with lighting. 'Burdick, said he has done over sign or ii_zance with "uilding Inspector ano ?placement of signs are in conformance wi.t Hugo's Ordinance. Schwab presented written recommendations -stated that since Htry. 61 no,- has restricted parking feels it is essential for owner to provide access directly from highway to a parking area for customers tirithin his property. Recommends improving the cu -:,,b cut already provided as a drive- way accessto a parking lct , whish could be located at the east end of his property. He also feels there should be a restricted zone of not less than twelve feet bac':: from the sidewalk. Schwab reminded Burdick that before any lighting; or additional advertising signs that do not exist now, could be installed, he would be required to submit to the Planning Commission detailed plans for such. He further recommended blacktop -Ding of the drive-